Certain Electric Power Tools, Battery Cartridges, and ... - USITC

plunge router would not be covered by Dr. Sorensen's secondary meaningsurvey. (Oral Argument, Tr. 3766). It was not covered by the survey andbears no resemblance to the D-handle router which was so covered.413. Respondent Jepson/ ( c ) D-handle router, Model No. 7112, isquite similar in design to the Makita router.(Compare CPX 19 with CPX20). The color scheme is different and the cap is somewhat different, butthere is a striking resemblance between these products when placed side byside. I find that the Jepson/( c ) model would infringe the claimeddesign mark of complainants.414. Respondent Alltrade's router, Model No. 1990-B-12 is identical tothe( c ) model and, therefore, would infringe the claimed design mark.(See RXP 247).415. The Chicago Electric Power Tool Model No. 344, imported and soldby respondent Central Purchasing d/b/a Harbor Freight is also identical tothe ( c model in design. (Compare CPX 18 to CPX 19). Therefore, italso would infringe the claimed design mark.416. The D-handle router of respondent New Golden Star, Model No. GS360, also appears to be identical in design to the Jepson model. (a, CPX88, Supplemental Ex. 2 to 'the Complaint). It too would infringe theclaimed design mark.I1 c *11. 7 114417. The 7 1/4" circular saw of respondents Jepson/ ( c 1, Model No.8218, is nearly identical in design and color to the Makita saw. There isa slight difference in the size and shape of the front grip, or ribbon ofthe handle, and in the adjustment knobs. (Compare CPX 33 with CPX 32). Ifind the Jepson/ ( C ) saw would infringe the design, color, and123