12.07.2015 Views

Institution of Local Self Governance and its Linkages with Tourism

Institution of Local Self Governance and its Linkages with Tourism

Institution of Local Self Governance and its Linkages with Tourism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

such powers <strong>and</strong> authority as may be necessary to function as un<strong>its</strong><strong>of</strong> self-government". This constitutional directive tended to inspire theUnion Government <strong>and</strong> State ·Governments, to adopt measures fordevelopment <strong>of</strong> the panchayats in the country.During the 1950s severa l states made legislations to democratize thestructure <strong>and</strong> devolve more powers <strong>and</strong> functions to the panchayats.The Five-year plans included in their programme measures tostrengthen loca l self-government to play a role in local developmentprocesses <strong>and</strong> to make them more responsive to people's needs <strong>and</strong>expectations. In spite <strong>of</strong> efforts taken by the planning process,fo rmation <strong>of</strong> panchayats <strong>and</strong> devolving appropriate powers <strong>and</strong>fu nctions to them were left to the respective state governments.Some states like West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh, <strong>and</strong> Kerala putappropriate measures to strengthen the local bodies, while manystates did not show their willing ness fo r decentralization process.Various committees were also set up by the Union Government tomake suggestions <strong>and</strong> recommendations on revita lizing thePanchayat Raj <strong>Institution</strong>s. One such committee was Ashoka MehtaCommittee whose ma in recommendations were fo r more genuine<strong>and</strong> effective devolution <strong>of</strong> powers to the Panchayats. The mostsignificant recommendation <strong>of</strong> the committee was for the creation <strong>of</strong>a two-tiered system <strong>of</strong> Panchayati raj namely, Zilla Parishad <strong>and</strong>M<strong>and</strong>ai Panchayat (which is a cluster <strong>of</strong> villages <strong>and</strong> is smaller thanthe present block panchayats). The committee felt that the ZillaParishad <strong>and</strong> not the Panchayat Samiti should be made the primary_. unit in the Panchayati Raj system as the Zilla Parishad enjoys greaterresou rces <strong>and</strong> leadership to play a substantial development role.For an effective coordination between development <strong>and</strong> urb<strong>and</strong>evelopment the committee suggested that the Municipal bodiesshould be given more representation in Zilla Parishad <strong>and</strong> M<strong>and</strong>aiPanchayat. As regards taxation, the committee recommended thePanchayati Raj <strong>Institution</strong>s to have compulsory powers <strong>of</strong> taxation tomo bilize the necessary resources on their own thereby reducing theirdependence on devolution <strong>of</strong> funds from the State Government. A16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!