12.07.2015 Views

Winter 2008 - Vol. 3 No. 3 - National Association of Extension 4-H ...

Winter 2008 - Vol. 3 No. 3 - National Association of Extension 4-H ...

Winter 2008 - Vol. 3 No. 3 - National Association of Extension 4-H ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The non-family-related activities that some <strong>of</strong> the dropouts participated in were dance clubs ororganized sports clubs where they would practice the same routine for one, two, or three hourseach day. At least for the dropouts in this category, these other after-school activities tookprecedence over the ASP. These structured monotonous activities were simply more “fun” and“interesting” than the unstructured, monotonous activities <strong>of</strong>fered at the ASP. Again, it may bebeneficial for program implementers to <strong>of</strong>fer a narrow set <strong>of</strong> gender- and age-specific activitieswith clearly stated purposes and goals. This may decrease the number <strong>of</strong> students in aparticular ASP, but help increase retention and engagement rates at the ASP. Tied closely tothis issue is the fourth highest reason for non-participation: program length. When studentsare bored and uninterested, program length becomes a problem. When students are engagedand excited to be present, program length is less <strong>of</strong> a problem.Eighteen percent <strong>of</strong> the dropouts in this study cited family-related after-school activities as abarrier to participation. Some students routinely watched their siblings after school, performedbasic household chores, and/or spent time with a parent in a different household after school.For program implementers, these family-related after-school activities may be harder obstaclesto overcome. However, when program implementers have some knowledge about anadolescent’s commitments outside <strong>of</strong> the program, it should help them design programs thatwork around an adolescent’s schedule. For example, some ASPs use “drop in” programs andactivities with flexible schedules as recruitment and retention strategies for older youth whomay have more demands on their time.Finally, from this research, there is no indication that students were unwilling to participate inthe academically-oriented activities at the ASP. Even the students who claimed that theacademically-oriented components <strong>of</strong> the ASP were “boring,” cited a few other reasons such asinvolvement in “other after-school activities” as the main barrier to participation. However, thisstudy did find that some dropouts felt that there was a lack <strong>of</strong> quality academic help. Theresults imply that it is imperative that tutors, program staff, and helpers be knowledgeable inthe student’s coursework, especially in the particularly difficult areas <strong>of</strong> math, reading, andlanguage arts. It may be beneficial to do one <strong>of</strong> two things: either conduct an assessment <strong>of</strong>the student’s math, reading, history, language arts (and other subjects) skills and find outwhere the majority <strong>of</strong> the students are struggling, or access their student records in order todetermine the areas that need improvement. Perhaps this manner <strong>of</strong> addressing academicconcerns will help program implementers in the hiring process and help give students the toolsthey need to improve their academic skills and further their academic success.Recommendations for Future StudiesFuture studies may want to take into consideration the challenges recognized in this study asthey seek to develop after-school programming that suits the unpredictable needs <strong>of</strong> studentsand their families.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!