Figure 7. Realized gain of the UCIRA-1 and CIRA-2.is 6 ps better than the commercial CIRA-2 [2, 3]. TheCIRA-2 has a standard feed with two coaxial cables thatextend to the feed point; whereas the UCIRA-1 has atwinline feed that we expected would be less efficient andmore lossy at high frequencies. The CIRA-2 is similar to theUCIRA but it has an F/D of 0.4 instead of 0.3. Thus, weconclude that the twinline feed works much better than weexpected.The normalized impulse response, hN(t), mentionedabove describes an antenna’s performance in bothtransmission and reception. This quantity is the normalizedimpulse response in reception and the normalized stepresponse in transmission. In this format, we have thereception and transmission equations as [16]V rec() t inc()= hN() tE t50 Ω 377 ΩE rad () t 1()/= h ()srcN tdV t dt377 Ω 2π cr 50 Ωwhere Vrec(t) is the received voltage into a 50 Ω load oroscilloscope, and Vsrc(t) is the source voltage as measuredinto a 50 Ω load or oscilloscope. Furthermore, Einc(t) isthe incident electric field, Erad(t) is the radiated electricfield, r is the distance away from the antenna, c is the speedof light in free space, and “ D ” is the convolution operator.Note that the above expressions refer by default to thedominant polarization on boresight, but they are easilyextended to multiple angles and polarizations. Note alsothat hN(t) has units of meters per second.In Figure 7 we show the realized gain (effective gain)of the antenna. The CIRA-2 data is included in the figure forcomparison. We see that the effective gains for the twoantennas are about the same up to 10 GHz. The losses dueto the twisted twinline are almost negligible. In Figure 8 weshow the theoretical gain for the UCIRA based on work byFigure 8. Theoretical gain of UCIRA-1 for defocusparameters of f o= 0°, 1.5°, and 10° (top to bottom).Scott Tyo [4, 5]. The three lines correspond to defocusparameters φ O = 0°, 1.5°, and 10°. The defocusingparameters will be discussed later. Since the UCIRA-1 hasa parabolic reflector, it corresponds to the top line, φ O = 0°.The measured gain for the UCIRA-1 is considerably lowerthan the theoretical value. This is due in part to the dispersionof the reflector, since the reflector is made from 12 panelsand therefore is not a true paraboloid of revolution. It isinteresting to note the reduction in the gain when a hyperbolicreflector is used to increase the beamwidth as can be seen inFigure 8.In addition to the copol gain on boresight shownabove we also measured the crosspol gain on boresight. Theaverage crosspol rejection is approximately 20 dB. Theantenna pattern measurements in the H and E planes showedsome sidelobes as is characteristic of the narrow beamwidthof an IRA, although it has been shown that the side lobes arereduced when the feed arms are located at the more optimal±30° from vertical [13].4. UCIRA-2 DesignThe design of the UCIRA required considerableresearch into materials suitable for use in a LEO spaceenvironment. The harsh space environment includes longduration vacuum, particle radiation, solar radiation (UV),temperature extremes, rapid thermal cycling, atomic oxygen,and micrometeoroid impact. We gained considerableinformation on materials and deployable device designfrom [17]. In the past we have used aluminum and stainlesssteel for most of the mechanical parts, carbon composite orfiberglass rods for the stays, Ni/Cu plated rip-stop nylon forthe feed arms and reflector, and polypyrrole treated polyesterfor the load resistors. Although we used some of the sameor similar materials on the UCIRA-2, there were a numberof improvements based on our research and thermal testing.The Ni/Cu plated nylon fabric used on the UCIRA-1was replaced with a different rip-stop nylon (94EN) that isNi/Ag plated that does not loose conductivity when creased.42The<strong>Radio</strong> <strong>Science</strong> <strong>Bulletin</strong> No <strong>313</strong> (<strong>June</strong>, <strong>2005</strong>)
Figure 9. UCIRA-2 in stowed configuration.We have some concern about the use of nylon in space;however, it appears to work better than expected so we usedthis material for the UCIRA-2. We also continued to use thepolypyrrole treated polyester for the load resistors as wehave done in the past. This material has a surface resistanceof approximately 200 Ω /sq so it is easy to obtain the correctload resistance.For the ribs or stays that support the reflector we usedgraphite reinforced composite rods. The hinges in the staysare aluminum with stainless steel torsion springs.The UCIRA-2 is shown in Figure 9 in the stowedconfiguration and in the fully deployed configuration inFigure 10. The UCIRA-2 has a hyperboloidal reflector tobroaden the beamwidth and has dual polarization capability.The hyperboloidal shape should increase the beamwidth byabout 20° [4, 5]. The diameter of the reflector is 1.22 m (48inches) and the F/D is 0.3 as with the UCIRA-1 and 1B. Thefeed arms have the outer edge inline with the rim of the dish(non-floppy) and are evenly spaced around the reflector tofacilitate the dual-polarized feed. The antenna weighsapproximately 2.6 kg (5.75 lb.). Most of the mass is in thedeployment mechanism. This mass could be reducedsomewhat by additional mechanical analysis and reducingthe thickness of parts where possible.Figure 10. UCIRA-2 in deployed configurationFigure 11. The conversion of a paraboloidal reflector toa hyperboloidal reflector.Now we will describe the modification required tobroaden the beamwidth of the UCIRA, we defocus theaperture by converting the paraboloidal reflector into ahyperboloid. In doing so, we must maintain the samereflector diameter and focal length. We specify an angle,φ O , which is the angle at which the extreme ray at the edgeof the reflector deviates from the focal direction (y), asshown in Figure 11. When φ O = 0, the hyperboloid revertsback to the paraboloid.It is unclear how the parameter φ O affects thebeamwidth. At extremely high frequencies, the beamwidthis 2φO , which is the optical limit. In practice, of course, thisis never achieved. As proof of this, a focused paraboloidwith φ O = 0 does not have a beamwidth of 0° at anyfrequency. At lower frequencies, a reasonable guess is thatthe beamwidth will broaden the beamwidth by an extra2φ O beyond the beamwidth of the focused (paraboloidal)case. J. Scott Tyo has investigated this in somewhat moredetail in [4, 5]We revisited several issues concerning the mechanicaldeployment system used on the UCIRA-1 and made severalchanges. First we found that the manual release pin on theUCIRA-1 was much too difficult to pull. An automatic pinpuller capable of holding the cam in place during launch andthen releasing the cam on command was out of the question.Therefore, we replaced the release pin with an EjectorRelease Mechanism (ERM) from TiNi Aerospace, Inc.Release is accomplished on command (9 VDC at 5 A for20 ms), by retracting five detent balls that hold a coupler tothe actuator, thereby ejecting the coupler and releasing thecam to which it is attached.Next, we replaced the gas spring used in the UCIRA-1 with 9 stainless steel conventional springs arranged in acircle around the ERM. The gas spring had the advantage ofsmall size and nearly constant force over the length of thestroke. However, we learned that gas springs cannot be usedbelow -40°C because they tend to lose the high pressurenitrogen charge at such low temperatures. The 9 conventionalsprings have a total force of 2.67 kN (600 lb.) in thecompressed or launch configuration and 1.33 kN (300 lb.)The<strong>Radio</strong> <strong>Science</strong> <strong>Bulletin</strong> No <strong>313</strong> (<strong>June</strong>, <strong>2005</strong>) 43
- Page 1 and 2: Radio Science BulletinISSN 1024-453
- Page 3 and 4: EditorialJune in December?Yes, this
- Page 5 and 6: URSI Accounts 2004In 2004, a year p
- Page 7 and 8: EURO EUROA2) Routine Meetings 7,315
- Page 9 and 10: URSI AWARDS 2005The URSI Board of O
- Page 11 and 12: Guest Editors’ RemarksOn February
- Page 13 and 14: UWB and the corresponding signal pa
- Page 15 and 16: Radar / CommunicationsBand TypeElec
- Page 17 and 18: of the spectrum is required to comp
- Page 19 and 20: Bandwidths f l / GHz f h / GHz B F
- Page 21 and 22: Figure 3a. A time-domain representa
- Page 23 and 24: Bandwidths f l / f c f h / f c B F
- Page 25 and 26: Bandwidth f l / f c f h / f c B F C
- Page 27 and 28: Quantitative Comparison BetweenMatr
- Page 29 and 30: Next, construct the ‘filtered’
- Page 31 and 32: whereH[ P ] [ U][ ][ V] ,N= Σ (27)
- Page 33 and 34: CPU Time [sec]250200150100MPMSS1SS2
- Page 35 and 36: -10-20MPMSS1SS2-30-40RMSE [dB]-50-6
- Page 37 and 38: RMSE [dB]-45-50-55-60-65-70MPMSS1SS
- Page 39 and 40: An Ultra-Compact Impulse-Radiating
- Page 41: Figure 3. UCIRA-1 splitter/balun.th
- Page 45 and 46: activated first in the deployment s
- Page 47 and 48: Figure 20. Theoretical gain ofUCIRA
- Page 49 and 50: Triennial Reports CommissionsCOMMIS
- Page 51: y the Special Section Editors, and
- Page 55 and 56: 3.2 Activities of URSI-Commission C
- Page 57 and 58: It already has been decided that th
- Page 59 and 60: SCOR (Scientific Committee on Ocean
- Page 61 and 62: COMMISSION GThis triennium report w
- Page 63 and 64: GNSS-LEO occultation is a very impo
- Page 65 and 66: CPEA Contacts: Shoichiro Fukao, Pro
- Page 67 and 68: The group wishes to continue as an
- Page 69 and 70: total of 109 oral papers (24 thereo
- Page 71 and 72: surface, to compensate for the rema
- Page 73 and 74: XXVIIIth General AssemblyNEWLY ELEC
- Page 75 and 76: Décide1. d’accepter l’invitati
- Page 77 and 78: satellite observation, bottomside s
- Page 79 and 80: ETTC ‘05EUROPEAN TEST AND TELEMET
- Page 81 and 82: IRI 2005 WORKSHOPNEW SATELLITE AND
- Page 83 and 84: financial and logistics issues conn
- Page 85 and 86: CONFERENCE ANNOUNCEMENTS36 TH COSPA
- Page 87 and 88: December 2006APMC 2006 - 2006 Asia-
- Page 89 and 90: The Journal of Atmospheric and Sola
- Page 91 and 92: SCIENTIFIC COMMISSIONSCommission A
- Page 93 and 94:
Commission E : Electromagnetic Nois
- Page 95 and 96:
Commission J : Radio AstronomyChair
- Page 97 and 98:
URSI MEMBER COMMITTEESAUSTRALIA Pre
- Page 99 and 100:
ALPHABETICAL INDEX AND CO-ORDINATES
- Page 101 and 102:
BRUSSAARD, Prof. dr.ir. G., Radicom
- Page 103 and 104:
FEICK, Dr. R., Depto. de Electronic
- Page 105 and 106:
SAUDI ARABIA, Tel. +966 1-4883555/4
- Page 107 and 108:
E-mail loulee@nspo.gov.tw (94)LEE,
- Page 109 and 110:
O’DROMA, Dr. M., Dept. of Electri
- Page 111 and 112:
+30 2310 998161, Fax +30 2310 99806
- Page 113 and 114:
TURSKI, Prof. A., ul. Krochmalna 3
- Page 115 and 116:
Information for authorsContentThe R