16.2 - Severe Accident Analysis (RRC-B) - EDF Hinkley Point

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SUB-CHAPTER : 16.2PRE-CONSTRUCTION SAFETY REPORTCHAPTER 16: RISK REDUCTION AND SEVEREACCIDENT ANALYSESPAGE : 283 / 295Document ID.No.UKEPR-0002-162 Issue 042.3.3.4.4. 5 cm (20 cm²) SB(LOCA) in the Cold Leg with Re-flood[Ref]J Eyink. Pressure and Temperature Loads for EPR with Steel Liner resulting fromHydrogen Combustion. NGPS4/2003/en/0020. Framatome ANP. (E)2.3.3.5. Temperature Loads2.3.3.5.1. Temperature Loads Due to Recombination[Ref]J Eyink, M Movahed, K-G Petzold. Thermal loads on the EPR containment wall due tohydrogen removal. KWU NA-T/2000/E018 Revision A. Siemens. (E)2.3.3.5.2. Temperature Loads Due to Combustion2.3.3.5.2.1. 5 cm (20 cm²) SB(LOCA) in the Cold Leg and Fast Secondary Cool-down[Ref]J Eyink, M Movahed. Thermal loads due to accidental ignition (SBLOCA).KWU NA-T/2000/E010 Revision A. Siemens. (E)2.3.3.5.2.2. 5 cm (20 cm²) SB(LOCA) in the Cold Leg with Partial Cool-down (Ex-VesselHydrogen)[Ref]J Eyink, M Movahed. Hydrogen risk from ex-vessel release. SNP NA T/2000/E035Revision A. Siemens. (E)2.3.3.5.2.3. 5 cm (20 cm²) SB(LOCA) in the Cold Leg with Partial Cool-down and DelayedDepressurisation[Ref]J Eyink, K-G Petzold. Thermal loads due to accidental ignition (SBLOCA/D).KWU NA-T/2000/E017 Revision A. Siemens. (E)2.3.4. Conclusions from the Verification Process[Ref]M Fischer, J Eyink. R&D for severe accidents. NGES2/2002/en/0007 Revision E(TR03/131). Framatome ANP. (E)SECTION 16.2.2.3 - TABLE 2[Ref] J Eyink. The EPR Hydrogen Mitigation Concept. NGPS4/2003/en/0192 (Table 4.7.1.1,page 66). Framatome ANP. (E)SECTION 16.2.2.3 – FIGURE 1[Ref]J Eyink. Pressure and Temperature Loads for EPR with Steel Liner resulting fromHydrogen Combustion. NGPS4/2003/en/0020. Framatome ANP. (E)
SUB-CHAPTER : 16.2PRE-CONSTRUCTION SAFETY REPORTCHAPTER 16: RISK REDUCTION AND SEVEREACCIDENT ANALYSESPAGE : 284 / 295Document ID.No.UKEPR-0002-162 Issue 04SECTION 16.2.2.3 - FIGURES 2 TO 7[Ref]J Eyink. The EPR Hydrogen Mitigation Concept. NGPS4/2003/en/0192.Framatome ANP. (E)SECTION 16.2.2.3 - FIGURES 8 AND 9[Ref]J Eyink, M Movahed. Effect of Spray Activation on the Reactivity of the Hydrogen-Air-Steam Mixture. NEGS2/2002/en/0018 Revision B. Framatome ANP. (E)SECTION 16.2.2.3 – FIGURE 10[Ref]J Eyink. Pressure and Temperature Loads for EPR with Steel Liner resulting fromHydrogen Combustion. NGPS4/2003/en/0020 Revision D. Framatome ANP.February 2004. (E)SECTION 16.2.2.3 – FIGURE 11[Ref]J Eyink. Hydrogen Control: Status of the Justification of Tools and Methods with regardto GPR and IRSN Concerns. NGPS4/2003/en/0132. Framatome ANP. (E)SECTION 16.2.2.3 – FIGURE 12[Ref]J Eyink. The EPR Hydrogen Mitigation Concept. NGPS4/2003/en/0192.Framatome ANP. (E)SECTION 16.2.2.3 - FIGURE 13[Ref]J Eyink. Pressure and Temperature Loads for EPR with Steel Liner resulting fromHydrogen Combustion. NGPS4/2003/en/0020 Revision D. Framatome ANP.February 2004. (E)2.4. ASSESSMENT OF MELT STABILISATION2.4.1. Basic strategy[Ref]M Fischer, M Klicheva. Functional principle of the core melt stabilization system of theEPR including a description of the relevant phenomena, the related experimentalbackground, and the impact of remaining uncertainties.NEPA-G/2010/en/1022 Revision C. AREVA NP. June 2010. (E)
Page 1 and 2:
Title: PCSR - Sub-chapter 16.2 - Se
Page 3 and 4:
Title: PCSR - Sub-chapter 16.2 - Se
Page 5 and 6:
SUB-CHAPTER : 16.2PRE-CONSTRUCTION
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
14SUB-CHAPTER : 16.2PRE-CONSTRUCTIO
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236: SUB-CHAPTER : 16.2PRE-CONSTRUCTION
Page 285: SUB-CHAPTER : 16.2PRE-CONSTRUCTION
show all

16.2 - Severe Accident Analysis (RRC-B) - EDF Hinkley Point

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?