Credible DataChanging systems to serve people in permanent, supportive housing versus emergencysettings requires the collection and dissemination of credible data to show that supportivehousing achieves better results, solves problems more consistently and costs no morethan current practices.Example: A prime example is Stark County’s use of a single individual within theircommunity to show the cost of doing nothing (Appendix B & C). This community trackedthe cost of serving one high user within their system through emergency rooms, jail,shelters and other emergency services. This example was able to focus on the costeffectivenessof permanent, supportive housing as well as the better outcomes of housingstability and employment.Columbus and Franklin County’s “Rebuilding Lives Updated Strategy, 2008” using credibledata and research documented the reduction in shelter use and the increase in tenantincome due to permanent supportive housing. In addition, seventy percent of PSHtenants successfully retained housing for five years. 12Networks of AlliesSuccess in permanent, supportive housing also requires the creation of networks thatreach across dimensions of money, cause, power, vision and issue. This includes coalitionsof housing and service agencies, courts, mental health systems and other mainstreamsystems.Example: This has been established in many Continuum of Care groups across <strong>Ohio</strong> andis being established statewide in <strong>Ohio</strong> through the Governor’s Interagency Council onHomelessness and Affordable <strong>Housing</strong>. Reaching across the table to make systems workfor people is much easier when various state agencies and providers are meeting andtalking regularly.Permanent Supportive <strong>Housing</strong> Emerging PracticesAs permanent, supportive housing production increases, many development andmanagement practices have emerged as successful across various supportive housingprojects and communities. These include:Focusing on Tenant EducationOver time, most service agencies have focused first on the recovery needs of personswith disabilities. <strong>Housing</strong> success, however, is usually much more closely related totenant education. Maintaining housing is first about paying your rent, caring for yourapartment and getting along with your neighbors and not every new tenant understandsthe importance and “how to” of these important tenant roles. For this reason, Community<strong>Housing</strong> Network in Columbus provides training on the requirements of the lease on theday of occupancy as well as 24 hours later to insure that all of the responsibilities andrepercussions are understood. They are also quick to hold case conferences if someonebreaks any of these rules to try to maintain tenancy through tenant education anddevelopment of eviction prevention plans.Separate <strong>Housing</strong> and Service RolesProviding permanent, supportive housing means the delivery of a myriad of services inaddition to housing. Many times, the roles of landlord and service provider contradictas it is the responsibility of the landlord to insure that the lease terms are met, whilethe service provider is focusing on the best outcome for the tenant. National ChurchResidences understands this dynamic and the fact that it creates conflict between the12Community Shelter Board, Rebuilding Live : New Strategies for a New Era (2008); page 44116
oles, so they create a contract between housing management staff and case managersto insure that they understand their distinct roles. They also meet regularly to understandeach others goals including budgets and outcome goals so they can come up withsolutions that address the needs of both and serve the client first. Other agencies addressthis same issue by focusing on housing or services and working together to provideboth through memorandums of agreement. Cleveland’s <strong>Housing</strong> First initiative has alsoinvested significantly in this critical area by engaging the services of successful New Yorkproviders, resulting in an operations manual that addresses the healthy tension betweenoperations and services.Jobs FirstAll successful permanent, supportive housing projects including those in Columbus,Dayton and Portland, Oregon show an increase in housing stability and a decreasein reliance on emergency rooms, detox programs, jails and respite care. However,employment has been less successful in permanent supportive housing nationwide oftendue to the fact that many tenants receive disability assistance and are not expectedto work. However, a new Jobs First program design is emerging and has been usedvery successfully by The Other Place and Goodwill in Dayton resulting in a 60 percentemployment rate at their 100 unit project, River Commons. Jobs First is a service modelthat seeks to engage tenants in employment from the moment they sign up for housing.It requires a dedicated Employment Manager working with tenants to make referrals tojobs and help coach them through difficult situations.Actions State Policy Makers Should Take To Address The GapsBased upon the research and experiences of the work group members, the following areactions recommended to address the gaps in developing more permanent supportivehousing in <strong>Ohio</strong>:1. Better coordinate existing state resources with Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)to capture more FHLB money in <strong>Ohio</strong> for PSH development.Rationale: The FHLB of Cincinnati has invested in PSH extensively in <strong>Ohio</strong>. Unfortunately,the percentage of their funds for special needs housing (of which PSH is one type) isdisproportionately going to projects in two other states in their footprint. Based uponpopulation census, <strong>Ohio</strong> represents 53 percent of FHLB of Cincinnati’s footprint but is onlycapturing approximately 36.5 percent of FHLB of Cincinnati resources. 132. Facilitate an easier, coordinated process for access to multiple state resourcesthat fosters partnership with local organizations for PSH development andoperations.Rationale: Providers and local community leaders must apply to multiple state agenciesto access limited PSH resources. These applications are commonly on differing applicationdeadlines, requiring differing supporting materials. Monitoring and compliance follows suitwith one PSH provider in Columbus reporting three separate monitoring visits by threeagencies in one month to review the same project. ODOD and ODMH have a workablemodel for shared investment. This concept should be examined further for application andextension.3. Assist local Continuums of Care that have underutilized federal HUD McKinneyVento funds available for PSH.Rationale: In 2007 alone, approximately $4 million of federal McKinney-Vento fundswere left unapplied for and therefore lost to the state of <strong>Ohio</strong> due to local capacity andinadequate numbers of new PSH projects.11713Corporation for Supportive <strong>Housing</strong>, <strong>Ohio</strong> office analysis completed on FHLB of Cincinnati’s 2005-2008 awards. Contact CSH at614.228.6263.
- Page 3 and 4:
OHFA Annual PlanThe Ohio Housing Fi
- Page 5:
Mission StatementsThe OHFA Annual P
- Page 8 and 9:
The State’s Housing NeedsAffordab
- Page 10 and 11:
Subject Matter Expert (SME) Workgro
- Page 12 and 13:
3. Financial LiteracyOHFA and other
- Page 14 and 15:
Affordable Housing Preservation & D
- Page 16 and 17:
federal subsidies. To achieve this
- Page 18 and 19:
Accessible HousingBackground DataOh
- Page 20 and 21:
3) Create dedicated funding streams
- Page 22 and 23:
• Recommend that Ohio support the
- Page 24 and 25:
Rural and Appalachian RegionsBackgr
- Page 26 and 27:
6. Annual Set-Asides and Incentives
- Page 28 and 29:
• Several cities in Ohio current
- Page 30 and 31:
OHFA should provide funding, traini
- Page 32 and 33:
Permanent Supportive Housing Produc
- Page 34 and 35:
3. The State should assist local Co
- Page 45 and 46:
PrioritizationThe challenge of prio
- Page 47 and 48:
Agency RecommendationsThe Annual Pl
- Page 49 and 50:
APPENDIXWorkgroup 1: Affordable Hom
- Page 51 and 52:
Executive SummaryHousing Need Descr
- Page 53 and 54:
efficiency and resource conservatio
- Page 55 and 56:
554. Home Buyer Education in OHFA F
- Page 57 and 58:
Estimated Units in Need of Some For
- Page 59 and 60:
Ohio County Foreclosure Filings (19
- Page 61 and 62:
Operating Costs - Met and Unmet Nee
- Page 63 and 64:
Workgroup #2:Affordable Housing Pre
- Page 65 and 66: Secondary Recommendations• Explor
- Page 67 and 68: Executive SummaryOhio’s supply of
- Page 69 and 70: Met Housing Needs (“Resource Inve
- Page 71 and 72: Ohio Deptof MentalRetardation andDe
- Page 73 and 74: Unmet Housing NeedsData OverviewThe
- Page 75 and 76: ody, and will be built within the C
- Page 77 and 78: • OHFA will continue to maintain
- Page 79 and 80: Best Practices, Policies and Progra
- Page 81 and 82: addition, 60,111 one-person househo
- Page 83 and 84: Across Ohio, people with very low i
- Page 85 and 86: • Responsible for Rent - The pers
- Page 87 and 88: Seattle, St. Louis, and Washington,
- Page 89 and 90: Primary Recommendations• Create a
- Page 91 and 92: Unmet Housing Needs:• Due to the
- Page 93 and 94: • The cost of construction often
- Page 95 and 96: Recommendations for Annual Plan Adv
- Page 97 and 98: capacity to quantify vacant propert
- Page 99 and 100: distributed on or about January 15,
- Page 101 and 102: Action is needed at the State level
- Page 103 and 104: a “user-friendly” data system,
- Page 105 and 106: 5) Incentivize the formation of bro
- Page 107 and 108: Workgroup #8:Permanent Supportive H
- Page 109 and 110: 3. Assist local Continuums of Care
- Page 111 and 112: Program and Resource InventoryNonpr
- Page 113 and 114: Table 2PopulationsPersons whoexperi
- Page 115: Examples: A national model for succ
- Page 119 and 120: Workgroup #8:Appendix ANameProgramD
- Page 121 and 122: or remedyingneglect, abuse,or the e
- Page 123 and 124: ased healthcare, and earlyintervent
- Page 125 and 126: “Bob” of Stark County, OhioPubl