Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Preservation & Development and Operating Costs forMultifamily <strong>Housing</strong>Background Data<strong>Ohio</strong> has a large and aging portfolio of subsidized housing properties across the state;there are approximately 179,000 affordable housing units in 2,700 affordable housingcommunities. Affordable housing is necessary because many <strong>Ohio</strong>an households face ahousing burden; these households either do not have access to appropriate housing or paytoo much for the housing occupied.Multifamily housing projects are required to maintain affordability for a specific timeperiod according to the financing program. Today there are nearly 88,000 affordableunits in projects where the owner, over the next five years, will have the option to exitthe program(s) as well as the affordability requirements. In addition, these projects incuroperating costs once developed; these costs are increasing, specifically real estate taxes,utilities, and insurance. Because of stagnant or slow growing household incomes in muchof <strong>Ohio</strong>, multifamily projects are unable to mitigate rising costs through rent increases. Theinability to increase rents, even marginally, further restricts the capital available to maintainprojects appropriately, which impacts the ability to provide an attractive product. As aresult, potential residents are not attracted to poorly maintained projects, so the cash flowof projects is further reduced because of unoccupied units, creating a downward cycle.The state has been a leader in recognizing the need to preserve affordable rental housing.Currently affordable housing communities are being preserved using a number of programsand collaborative efforts. The Low-Income <strong>Housing</strong> Tax Credit (LIHTC) program is animportant funding source for preserving communities; since 2001, 80 affordable housingprojects have been preserved. Over the last decade, preservation has also been addressedwith set-asides and special provisions in the Qualified Allocation <strong>Plan</strong> (QAP).SynopsisAffordable <strong>Housing</strong> PreservationWhile <strong>Ohio</strong> has made significant progress in preserving affordable housing, the overallneed is largely unmet owing to the size of the portfolio in <strong>Ohio</strong>. Preservation is importantbecause it can be more cost effective and energy efficient than building new and creatingadditional community assets. Sufficient resources do not exist to rehabilitate, recapitalize,and preserve all of the units that may be available.The impact of expiring projects is significant. It is magnified by <strong>Ohio</strong>’s changingdemographics, slow population growth and an increased older population. These changeswill require developers and funders of affordable housing to carefully consider wherehousing should be preserved and for which populations. Current policies and programspartially address this need.Development and Operating Costs for Multifamily <strong>Housing</strong>Each year, approximately $50 million is invested by <strong>OHFA</strong> in the development andconstruction of new units of affordable housing. Approximately, $22 million is from taxcredits and $27 million from gap financing sources and other funders. These new unitsonly meet a modest percentage of the identified need. According to The Millennial <strong>Housing</strong>Commission (MHC), nationally “the gap between the available rental supply of unitsaffordable to the poorest households and the demand for them stood at 1.8 million in1999.” 7 To make a substantial impact on the gap between extremely low-income householdsand the supply of affordable units available to them MHC determined that it would take7The Millennial <strong>Housing</strong> Commission. (2002) Meeting Our Nation’s <strong>Housing</strong> Challenges. Retrieved January 14, 2009, from http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/mhc/MHCReport.pdf14
annual production of more than 250,000 units for more than 20 years to close the gap.These national figures are reflective of the affordable housing gaps in <strong>Ohio</strong> as well.Few programs exist to meet the operating costs of affordable housing. Apartmentcommunities encounter the following costs and challenges:• Taxes: The use of the income approach to property valuation results in most taxcredit properties being over-valued. This results in higher payments of property taxes.At present there is no policy, program, or state law that helps to address this issue.However, tax abatements and other agreements are available for relief.• Utilities: Utility cost increases are reflected in a reduction in the net rent an ownerreceives as a result of the utility allowance most housing programs require. Otherthan encouraging the resident to reduce usage, the owner has few options to reducethe impact of rising utility allowances. The IRS has issued a revised utility allowanceregulation that should ensure more accurate allowances.• Insurance: Costs are covered by property revenues; increasing costs have negativelyimpacted many property budgets.• Compliance: Compliance fees of multiple programs can increase a property’s costs;there is not a specific program available to reduce these costs confronted by properties.HUD subsidy programs help to pay many of the operating costs of affordable apartmentcommunities; however some subsidies are not available to all properties. More importantly,even those properties with a dedicated subsidy for operating costs find that the costs arerising faster than the subsidy payments, leaving a significant gap between what is collectedthrough rents and subsidies and what must be paid to operate the property. The programsand resources that exist to increase the energy efficiency of apartment homes usuallyrequire an investment from the owner. Cash constrained properties find it difficult to raisethe capital necessary to fund energy efficiency measures.RecommendationsThere is significant interest and need for the preservation and development of affordablehousing in <strong>Ohio</strong>. It is also recognized that development and operating costs are twounique, intertwined problems that create additional challenges. Primary and secondaryrecommendations were developed to address these affordable housing needs.Primary1) Expand the use of multifamily bonds. As a state-wide entity, <strong>OHFA</strong> can issuemultifamily bonds for projects anywhere in <strong>Ohio</strong>. The <strong>Agency</strong> is also responsible forallocating 4 percent tax credits to federally subsidized projects. These two responsibilitiesplace <strong>OHFA</strong> in a unique position to impact preservation projects. <strong>OHFA</strong> should review thecosts associated with issuing bonds and make adjustments as appropriate to ensure <strong>OHFA</strong> isan attractive issuer of multifamily debt. Explore the viability of <strong>OHFA</strong> financing or providingcredit enhancement.2) End mandatory extended use. Reinstate the qualified contract process to ensureproperties can transition to the best use.3) <strong>OHFA</strong> will direct significant tax credit allocations for the preservation ofaffordable housing. <strong>OHFA</strong> will enhance established priorities that recognize thatpreservation projects significantly outnumber the resources available and therefore, willdevelop a sound and reasonable criterion that strives to achieve the highest number oflong-term sustainable preservation units. Revise policies to ensure that multiple fundingresources, (ie. HOME, HDAP, AHT, etc.) are efficiently utilized in projects with tax credits and15
- Page 3 and 4: OHFA Annual PlanThe Ohio Housing Fi
- Page 5: Mission StatementsThe OHFA Annual P
- Page 8 and 9: The State’s Housing NeedsAffordab
- Page 10 and 11: Subject Matter Expert (SME) Workgro
- Page 12 and 13: 3. Financial LiteracyOHFA and other
- Page 16 and 17: federal subsidies. To achieve this
- Page 18 and 19: Accessible HousingBackground DataOh
- Page 20 and 21: 3) Create dedicated funding streams
- Page 22 and 23: • Recommend that Ohio support the
- Page 24 and 25: Rural and Appalachian RegionsBackgr
- Page 26 and 27: 6. Annual Set-Asides and Incentives
- Page 28 and 29: • Several cities in Ohio current
- Page 30 and 31: OHFA should provide funding, traini
- Page 32 and 33: Permanent Supportive Housing Produc
- Page 34 and 35: 3. The State should assist local Co
- Page 45 and 46: PrioritizationThe challenge of prio
- Page 47 and 48: Agency RecommendationsThe Annual Pl
- Page 49 and 50: APPENDIXWorkgroup 1: Affordable Hom
- Page 51 and 52: Executive SummaryHousing Need Descr
- Page 53 and 54: efficiency and resource conservatio
- Page 55 and 56: 554. Home Buyer Education in OHFA F
- Page 57 and 58: Estimated Units in Need of Some For
- Page 59 and 60: Ohio County Foreclosure Filings (19
- Page 61 and 62: Operating Costs - Met and Unmet Nee
- Page 63 and 64: Workgroup #2:Affordable Housing Pre
- Page 65 and 66:
Secondary Recommendations• Explor
- Page 67 and 68:
Executive SummaryOhio’s supply of
- Page 69 and 70:
Met Housing Needs (“Resource Inve
- Page 71 and 72:
Ohio Deptof MentalRetardation andDe
- Page 73 and 74:
Unmet Housing NeedsData OverviewThe
- Page 75 and 76:
ody, and will be built within the C
- Page 77 and 78:
• OHFA will continue to maintain
- Page 79 and 80:
Best Practices, Policies and Progra
- Page 81 and 82:
addition, 60,111 one-person househo
- Page 83 and 84:
Across Ohio, people with very low i
- Page 85 and 86:
• Responsible for Rent - The pers
- Page 87 and 88:
Seattle, St. Louis, and Washington,
- Page 89 and 90:
Primary Recommendations• Create a
- Page 91 and 92:
Unmet Housing Needs:• Due to the
- Page 93 and 94:
• The cost of construction often
- Page 95 and 96:
Recommendations for Annual Plan Adv
- Page 97 and 98:
capacity to quantify vacant propert
- Page 99 and 100:
distributed on or about January 15,
- Page 101 and 102:
Action is needed at the State level
- Page 103 and 104:
a “user-friendly” data system,
- Page 105 and 106:
5) Incentivize the formation of bro
- Page 107 and 108:
Workgroup #8:Permanent Supportive H
- Page 109 and 110:
3. Assist local Continuums of Care
- Page 111 and 112:
Program and Resource InventoryNonpr
- Page 113 and 114:
Table 2PopulationsPersons whoexperi
- Page 115 and 116:
Examples: A national model for succ
- Page 117 and 118:
oles, so they create a contract bet
- Page 119 and 120:
Workgroup #8:Appendix ANameProgramD
- Page 121 and 122:
or remedyingneglect, abuse,or the e
- Page 123 and 124:
ased healthcare, and earlyintervent
- Page 125 and 126:
“Bob” of Stark County, OhioPubl