<strong>OHFA</strong> should provide funding, training and technical assistance to municipalities andcounties to help them develop or improve their data collection systems and strategies toaddress vacant properties and neighborhood revitalization. Potential first steps include:A) Conduct a needs assessment of the state’s first and second tier municipalities andcounties to determine needs and associated costs; andB) Provide or facilitate workshops for local governments on basic data collection methods,definitions and team approaches with other government offices to share data.5) Incentivize the formation of broad coalitions and collaborations to addressvacant housing.Provide seed funding and/or other incentives as an incentive for the formation of urbancollaborations and development of community-based, data-driven strategies that supportneighborhood stabilization and market recovery. The <strong>Ohio</strong> Vacant Properties Initiative(OVPI) final report recommends that <strong>OHFA</strong> invest in initiatives that take advantage ofand work in partnership with county wide or regional information systems, especiallyUniversity partnerships. The work of the National Vacant Properties Campaign in <strong>Ohio</strong>cities (including Toledo, Cleveland, Dayton, and now Youngstown) show the importanceof having a clear information system that quantifies and tracks both vacant housingstructures as well as its effects on crime, tax revenues, and neighborhood instability. Inturn this information aids the development of coalitions and their comprehensive plansfrom a broad range of stakeholders; and allows for the development of strategies basedupon data and the involvement of a variety of stakeholders beyond traditional housing andsocial service organizations. A diverse coalition of stakeholders is a potentially powerful toolin developing comprehensive vacant property strategies. Such stakeholders might includelocal government, Community Development Corporations (CDCs) and Community <strong>Housing</strong>Development Organizations (CHDOs), neighborhood and civic associations, hospitals,schools, universities and other major anchor institutions, large and small businesses andcorporations, realtors, homebuilders, financial institutions, police, city planners, socialservice agencies, engineers (to address infrastructure issues), university extension services(to address reuse of vacant land) and environmental specialists.6) Provide consistent funding streams for rehab and demolition of vacant housing.Low- to Moderate-Income <strong>Housing</strong> Trust FundWe recommend the State of <strong>Ohio</strong> remove the cap on the <strong>Housing</strong> Trust Fund which limitsthe amount used for housing to $50 million. This will allow efforts started by federal, State,and local resources to continue into the future. In addition, it is recommended that the <strong>Ohio</strong>Revised Code be modified to allow up to 5 percent of the <strong>Housing</strong> Trust Fund to be usedfor demolition only of vacant and blighted structures. Land that becomes vacant as a resultof <strong>Housing</strong> Trust Fund dollars must remain vacant or be used in a manner that benefitslow- and moderate-income (LMI) households for a period of at least five years (e.g. parks,community and recreational buildings and safety services that benefit a LMI neighborhoods).7) Take quick action to slow the rate and impact of foreclosures and preventhomes from becoming vacant.The State needs to look at how to slow the rate of foreclosures, one of the major causesof vacant housing. Both state and local agencies are investing in foreclosure preventioncounseling, some of which now have success rates as high as 50 percent. Unfortunately,while success is high, the number of foreclosure defendants entering the counseling systemis low.30
The State should consider temporary emergency legislation (3 to 24 months) that mandatesa stay of proceedings on occupied property and a court-ordered referral to one of thefunded counseling programs. By doing this, state and local court systems would be takingmaximum advantage of state and local foreclosure prevention programs.One strategy to prevent vacant housing and more people from becoming displaced due toforeclosure is to provide more protections to tenants. Renters face serious consequencesas a result of foreclosure, including immediate eviction, displacement and high transitioncosts, including new security deposits, increased new rent, moving and storage costs, andproperty costs.A recent Policy Matters <strong>Ohio</strong> report entitled “Collateral Damage: Renters in the ForeclosureCrisis,” shows the impact the foreclosure crisis has on renters in Cuyahoga County andelsewhere in the state. The study found that nearly 4,000 foreclosure filings were rentalproperties and foreclosures of rental units have increased at a higher rate than owneroccupiedproperties.According to COHHIO, renters need protections that would allow them to stay in their unitsfor a period of time following the foreclosure of their unit, making it easier for them torelocate or enter into new arrangements with the new owner. Tenants also need at least 30days written notice before a sheriff sale and the ability to continue their tenancy upon saleto a new owner. Legislation has been introduced in the House and Senate to provide greaterprotections to tenants in the event of foreclosure actions.8) Continue with efforts to address Foreclosure Prevention in an effort to minimizethe increase of vacant housing.Recommend the State of <strong>Ohio</strong> restart the Foreclosure Prevention Task Force in order toevaluate the progress of recommendations made; evaluate new possibilities in light ofchanges to legislation, changes to markets, efforts undertaken by local governments, andto address unforeseen issues that arise throughout these market conditions. While vacanthousing has always been a factor in the market, it has never been to the degree currentlyseen. These conditions will not be mitigated over a short period, and conditions will changewith the market. Therefore, the Task Force should remain as long as this condition continuesto place a significant burden on <strong>Ohio</strong>.31
- Page 3 and 4: OHFA Annual PlanThe Ohio Housing Fi
- Page 5: Mission StatementsThe OHFA Annual P
- Page 8 and 9: The State’s Housing NeedsAffordab
- Page 10 and 11: Subject Matter Expert (SME) Workgro
- Page 12 and 13: 3. Financial LiteracyOHFA and other
- Page 14 and 15: Affordable Housing Preservation & D
- Page 16 and 17: federal subsidies. To achieve this
- Page 18 and 19: Accessible HousingBackground DataOh
- Page 20 and 21: 3) Create dedicated funding streams
- Page 22 and 23: • Recommend that Ohio support the
- Page 24 and 25: Rural and Appalachian RegionsBackgr
- Page 26 and 27: 6. Annual Set-Asides and Incentives
- Page 28 and 29: • Several cities in Ohio current
- Page 32 and 33: Permanent Supportive Housing Produc
- Page 34 and 35: 3. The State should assist local Co
- Page 45 and 46: PrioritizationThe challenge of prio
- Page 47 and 48: Agency RecommendationsThe Annual Pl
- Page 49 and 50: APPENDIXWorkgroup 1: Affordable Hom
- Page 51 and 52: Executive SummaryHousing Need Descr
- Page 53 and 54: efficiency and resource conservatio
- Page 55 and 56: 554. Home Buyer Education in OHFA F
- Page 57 and 58: Estimated Units in Need of Some For
- Page 59 and 60: Ohio County Foreclosure Filings (19
- Page 61 and 62: Operating Costs - Met and Unmet Nee
- Page 63 and 64: Workgroup #2:Affordable Housing Pre
- Page 65 and 66: Secondary Recommendations• Explor
- Page 67 and 68: Executive SummaryOhio’s supply of
- Page 69 and 70: Met Housing Needs (“Resource Inve
- Page 71 and 72: Ohio Deptof MentalRetardation andDe
- Page 73 and 74: Unmet Housing NeedsData OverviewThe
- Page 75 and 76: ody, and will be built within the C
- Page 77 and 78: • OHFA will continue to maintain
- Page 79 and 80: Best Practices, Policies and Progra
- Page 81 and 82:
addition, 60,111 one-person househo
- Page 83 and 84:
Across Ohio, people with very low i
- Page 85 and 86:
• Responsible for Rent - The pers
- Page 87 and 88:
Seattle, St. Louis, and Washington,
- Page 89 and 90:
Primary Recommendations• Create a
- Page 91 and 92:
Unmet Housing Needs:• Due to the
- Page 93 and 94:
• The cost of construction often
- Page 95 and 96:
Recommendations for Annual Plan Adv
- Page 97 and 98:
capacity to quantify vacant propert
- Page 99 and 100:
distributed on or about January 15,
- Page 101 and 102:
Action is needed at the State level
- Page 103 and 104:
a “user-friendly” data system,
- Page 105 and 106:
5) Incentivize the formation of bro
- Page 107 and 108:
Workgroup #8:Permanent Supportive H
- Page 109 and 110:
3. Assist local Continuums of Care
- Page 111 and 112:
Program and Resource InventoryNonpr
- Page 113 and 114:
Table 2PopulationsPersons whoexperi
- Page 115 and 116:
Examples: A national model for succ
- Page 117 and 118:
oles, so they create a contract bet
- Page 119 and 120:
Workgroup #8:Appendix ANameProgramD
- Page 121 and 122:
or remedyingneglect, abuse,or the e
- Page 123 and 124:
ased healthcare, and earlyintervent
- Page 125 and 126:
“Bob” of Stark County, OhioPubl