While programs such as the Low Income <strong>Housing</strong> Tax Credit (LIHTC) program have workedto increase the number of accessible housing units, affordability continues to be a concern.Frequently, individuals with disabilities receive Supplemental Security Income as their onlysource of income. At $637 a month, or approximately 18 percent of the median incomein <strong>Ohio</strong>, SSI recipients are priced out of most of the Low Income <strong>Housing</strong> Tax Creditapartments, most of which are targeted to those earning 50 to 60 percent of the medianincome.In addition, there is little information about the location of accessible units available amongexisting housing stock. Many developers of affordable housing do not include informationabout accessibility in their property lists. For this reason, in some communities, accessibleunits remain vacant. This reinforces the misperception that all who need affordable andaccessible housing units are being accommodated.Other Anecdotal DataIn FY 2008, the <strong>Ohio</strong> Legal Rights Service (OLRS) assisted over 5,300 people withdisabilities. At least half of those were people with intellectual, developmental, physicaland other disabilities. Additionally the OLRS served 300 people with community integrationissues, some of which were related to physical accessibility issues or denial of reasonableaccommodation and modifications. 4According to the OLRS, there is an inadequate supply of safe, affordable and accessiblehousing for individuals with disabilities. Because of this, many are placed in nursing homeseven though that level of care is often inappropriate. Others live with aging parents or inhousing with physical barriers. Although they may have a roof over their heads, this doesnot mean that their housing needs are met. 5Nonprofit organizations and local government programs have waiting lists for their homemodification services that enable people with disabilities to remain in their homes. TheAbility Center of Greater Toledo has mailed out approximately 400 applications for homemodifications since Jan. 1, 2008. There is currently a 12-16 month wait before they caneffectively serve those who have requested assistance. This level of need is a reflection ofminimal public relations efforts - they do not advertise on a regular basis. 6Best Practices, Policies and ProgramsMass AccessThe Mass Accessible <strong>Housing</strong> Registry is a free program that helps people with disabilitiesfind rental housing in Massachusetts, primarily accessible and barrier-free housing. Thedatabase tracks accessible and affordable apartments throughout the state, maintaininginformation about their availability. Massachusetts state law requires that owners andmanagers list all available, accessible units with Mass Access.The program was started in 1995. Mass Access catalogs every accessible or adaptable unitin the state and tracks its availability. The system distributes current vacancy informationto disability agencies and people with disabilities. On a daily basis, this information is sentstatewide.Toledo, <strong>Ohio</strong> Visitability OrdinanceThe goal of this ordinance is to set and implement visitability-building standards for one,two and three family dwelling units, which have received a subsidy from a Governmental4N/A: <strong>Ohio</strong>ans with Disabilities and the Consolidated <strong>Plan</strong> - Comments for <strong>Ohio</strong>’s Consolidated <strong>Plan</strong> for Fiscal Year 2009, Submittedby the <strong>Ohio</strong> Legal Rights Service5See note 4 above6Ash Lemons, Director, <strong>Housing</strong> Resource Center, The Ability Center of Greater Toledo74
ody, and will be built within the City of Toledo. Under this ordinance the construction ofthe dwelling must contain specific criteria in order to meet the newly established visitabilityrequirements. All new one, two and three family dwelling units, which have received asubsidy to build from a Governmental body or agency, must comply with the requirementsbelow in addition to the requirements provided in the adopted residential code:(a) No step entrance: Provide at least one no step entrance. The required no step entranceshall be accessed via a visitable route. (b) Doors/Openings: All doors and openings shallhave a minimum net clear width of 32”. (c) Hallways/Corridors: All hallways and corridorson the main floor shall be at least 36” in width. (d) Bathroom/Half Bath: Provide a bathroomor half bath on the main floor with clear floor space of 30” x 48”. (e) Bathroom/Half BathWalls: All walls in the required bathroom/half bath shall have reinforcing/backing in thewalls to allow for future installation of grab bars. (f) Wall Electrical Outlets: Wall electricaloutlets on the main floor shall be mounted at least 15 inches above the finished floor. (g)Light Switches, Thermostats and other Controls: Light switches, thermostats and othercontrol devices on the main floor shall be mounted no higher than 48” above finished floor.This ordinance was passed September 20, 2005.Visitabilty Ordinance - State of TexasIf a person is awarded state or federal funds by the Texas Department of <strong>Housing</strong> andCommunity Affairs to construct single family affordable housing for individuals and familiesof low and very low income, the affordable housing identified on the person’s fundingapplication must be constructed so that it is visitable. This law took effect on September 1,1999.Universal Design Ordinance - City of San Antonio, TexasIf a person receives financial assistance from city, state or federal funds administered by theCity of San Antonio for the construction of single family homes, duplexes or triplexes, thatperson shall construct the units in accordance with the tenets of visitability. This ordinancewas passed on April 18, 2002.International Code Council (ICC)/American National Standards Institute (ANSI)Code Language on VisitabilityThe ICC/ANSI A117.1 standard will soon include design criteria for visitability features thatcould be adopted by municipalities or via state/local ordinance for implementation acrossthe country. 7 The inclusion of visitability criteria in A117.1 is the culmination of the effortsof an International Code Council (ICC) working group (originally convened in 2006) chargedwith developing model code guidelines for housing not covered by the Fair <strong>Housing</strong> Act,i.e., for new one- to three- family dwellings, which would be suitable for adoption by localjurisdictions, whether a given jurisdiction intended to apply it to all new houses or withina narrower scope. The working group includes disability advocates as well as membersfrom federal agencies like the US Access Board and HUD. The technical criteria for visitable(“Type C”) units are summarized below. 87The section on Visitability (Type C Units) will be included in Chapter 10 of the A117.1 standard, but Type C units will not be scopedin the International Building Code, meaning, they will not be required by the code. The intent of providing the Type C criteria inA117.1 was to provide a standardized set of guidelines that could be adopted by a jurisdiction, if they were pursuing Visitabilityinitiatives on the local or state levels.8Criteria for Type C or Visitable Units75At least one accessible entrance into the home from a public street or sidewalk, a dwelling unit driveway, or a garage.An accessible circulation path shall connect an entrance with a toilet room or bathroom, with one habitable space with an area70 square feet minimum and with a food preparation area (if one is provided on the entrance level of the home).The toilet room/bathroom should have basic clearance at the water closet and reinforcements in the walls for the futureinstallation of grab bars.Doors with sufficient clear width shall be provided throughout the entrance level of the home.Lighting controls and receptacle outlets shall be mounted within accessible reach ranges.Clearances between all opposing base cabinets, counter tops, appliances or walls within food preparation areas (if provided onthe entrance level) shall be 40 inches minimum.
- Page 3 and 4:
OHFA Annual PlanThe Ohio Housing Fi
- Page 5:
Mission StatementsThe OHFA Annual P
- Page 8 and 9:
The State’s Housing NeedsAffordab
- Page 10 and 11:
Subject Matter Expert (SME) Workgro
- Page 12 and 13:
3. Financial LiteracyOHFA and other
- Page 14 and 15:
Affordable Housing Preservation & D
- Page 16 and 17:
federal subsidies. To achieve this
- Page 18 and 19:
Accessible HousingBackground DataOh
- Page 20 and 21:
3) Create dedicated funding streams
- Page 22 and 23:
• Recommend that Ohio support the
- Page 24 and 25: Rural and Appalachian RegionsBackgr
- Page 26 and 27: 6. Annual Set-Asides and Incentives
- Page 28 and 29: • Several cities in Ohio current
- Page 30 and 31: OHFA should provide funding, traini
- Page 32 and 33: Permanent Supportive Housing Produc
- Page 34 and 35: 3. The State should assist local Co
- Page 45 and 46: PrioritizationThe challenge of prio
- Page 47 and 48: Agency RecommendationsThe Annual Pl
- Page 49 and 50: APPENDIXWorkgroup 1: Affordable Hom
- Page 51 and 52: Executive SummaryHousing Need Descr
- Page 53 and 54: efficiency and resource conservatio
- Page 55 and 56: 554. Home Buyer Education in OHFA F
- Page 57 and 58: Estimated Units in Need of Some For
- Page 59 and 60: Ohio County Foreclosure Filings (19
- Page 61 and 62: Operating Costs - Met and Unmet Nee
- Page 63 and 64: Workgroup #2:Affordable Housing Pre
- Page 65 and 66: Secondary Recommendations• Explor
- Page 67 and 68: Executive SummaryOhio’s supply of
- Page 69 and 70: Met Housing Needs (“Resource Inve
- Page 71 and 72: Ohio Deptof MentalRetardation andDe
- Page 73: Unmet Housing NeedsData OverviewThe
- Page 77 and 78: • OHFA will continue to maintain
- Page 79 and 80: Best Practices, Policies and Progra
- Page 81 and 82: addition, 60,111 one-person househo
- Page 83 and 84: Across Ohio, people with very low i
- Page 85 and 86: • Responsible for Rent - The pers
- Page 87 and 88: Seattle, St. Louis, and Washington,
- Page 89 and 90: Primary Recommendations• Create a
- Page 91 and 92: Unmet Housing Needs:• Due to the
- Page 93 and 94: • The cost of construction often
- Page 95 and 96: Recommendations for Annual Plan Adv
- Page 97 and 98: capacity to quantify vacant propert
- Page 99 and 100: distributed on or about January 15,
- Page 101 and 102: Action is needed at the State level
- Page 103 and 104: a “user-friendly” data system,
- Page 105 and 106: 5) Incentivize the formation of bro
- Page 107 and 108: Workgroup #8:Permanent Supportive H
- Page 109 and 110: 3. Assist local Continuums of Care
- Page 111 and 112: Program and Resource InventoryNonpr
- Page 113 and 114: Table 2PopulationsPersons whoexperi
- Page 115 and 116: Examples: A national model for succ
- Page 117 and 118: oles, so they create a contract bet
- Page 119 and 120: Workgroup #8:Appendix ANameProgramD
- Page 121 and 122: or remedyingneglect, abuse,or the e
- Page 123 and 124: ased healthcare, and earlyintervent
- Page 125 and 126:
“Bob” of Stark County, OhioPubl