Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant
Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant
Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER 7TENANT’S OBLIGATIONS7.01 The ensuing chapters 1 deal with <strong>the</strong> main obligati<strong>on</strong>sentered into by tenants when <strong>the</strong>y take a tenancy. These relate to rent,service charges, repairs <strong>and</strong> insurance. O<strong>the</strong>r obligati<strong>on</strong>s are, <strong>of</strong>course, likely to be entered into, such as covenants against orrestricting alienati<strong>on</strong> (such as assignment <strong>and</strong> subletting), user <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>premises <strong>and</strong> making improvements or alterati<strong>on</strong>s. 2 Those matters arecovered by provisi<strong>on</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>tained in <strong>the</strong> <strong>L<strong>and</strong>lord</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Tenant</strong>(Amendment) Act 1980 3 <strong>and</strong> were c<strong>on</strong>sidered in <strong>the</strong> Commissi<strong>on</strong>’s<str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>sultati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Paper</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> Business Tenancies 4 published in March 2003.They <strong>the</strong>refore fall outside <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> this <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>sultati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Paper</str<strong>on</strong>g>.7.02 The Commissi<strong>on</strong> does, <strong>of</strong> course, recognise that inparticular cases provisi<strong>on</strong>s imposing o<strong>the</strong>r obligati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> tenants maybe included in leases. 5 However, it takes <strong>the</strong> view that it is notappropriate to attempt to legislate for every c<strong>on</strong>ceivable possibility<strong>and</strong> that some scope for c<strong>on</strong>tractual arrangements should be left. Ithas noted that <strong>the</strong> Residential Tenancies Bill 2003 c<strong>on</strong>tains somefur<strong>the</strong>r examples which it would impose <strong>on</strong> tenants, such as anobligati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> tenant not to behave within <strong>the</strong> dwelling, or to allowo<strong>the</strong>r occupiers or visitors to <strong>the</strong> dwelling, to behave within it in away which is “anti-social”. 6 The Commissi<strong>on</strong> inclines to <strong>the</strong> view123456Chapters 8-11.See <strong>the</strong> precedents in Divisi<strong>on</strong> L <strong>of</strong> Laffoy’s Irish C<strong>on</strong>veyancingPrecedents (Looseleaf Butterworths).Part V. Note also <strong>the</strong> provisi<strong>on</strong>s in secti<strong>on</strong> 16(j)–(l) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ResidentialTenancies Bill 2003.Paragraph 4.44.See again <strong>the</strong> precedents in Divisi<strong>on</strong> L <strong>of</strong> Laffoy’s Irish C<strong>on</strong>veyancingPrecedents (Looseleaf Butterworths).Secti<strong>on</strong> 16(h). What amounts to such behaviour is defined in secti<strong>on</strong> 17.Note also secti<strong>on</strong> 16(m) which would require <strong>the</strong> tenant to notify <strong>the</strong>l<strong>and</strong>lord <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> identity <strong>of</strong> each pers<strong>on</strong> (o<strong>the</strong>r than a multiple tenant)residing in <strong>the</strong> dwelling.109