13.07.2015 Views

Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant

Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant

Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

seems to be inc<strong>on</strong>sistent with <strong>the</strong> comm<strong>on</strong> law in several respects.For example, under <strong>the</strong> comm<strong>on</strong> law a holding over by a tenant willresult automatically in a periodic tenancy arising, if <strong>the</strong> facts warrantit. 64 There is no questi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong>lord having an opti<strong>on</strong> in thisregard, as under secti<strong>on</strong> 5, apparently to foist <strong>the</strong> periodic tenancy <strong>on</strong><strong>the</strong> tenant. Under <strong>the</strong> comm<strong>on</strong> law <strong>the</strong> periodic tenancy arises from<strong>the</strong> deemed implied agreement <strong>of</strong> both parties, probably <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> basis<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> doctrine <strong>of</strong> estoppel. 65 Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore at comm<strong>on</strong> law <strong>the</strong>periodic tenancy arises immediately up<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> overholding <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rcircumstances occurring which give rise to <strong>the</strong> estoppel, 66 whereassecti<strong>on</strong> 5 refers to <strong>the</strong> somewhat arbitrary fixed date <strong>of</strong> <strong>on</strong>e m<strong>on</strong>thafter a dem<strong>and</strong> for possessi<strong>on</strong> by <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong>lord. Secti<strong>on</strong> 5 c<strong>on</strong>fers <strong>on</strong><strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong>lord <strong>the</strong> opti<strong>on</strong> to treat <strong>the</strong> tenant as holding under a tenancyfrom year to year, yet at comm<strong>on</strong> law <strong>the</strong> courts recognise that <strong>the</strong>circumstances <strong>of</strong> a particular case may justify a finding that someo<strong>the</strong>r kind <strong>of</strong> periodic tenancy has arisen. 67 Given <strong>the</strong>se doubts <strong>and</strong>difficulties it is not surprising that secti<strong>on</strong> 5 has very rarely beeninvoked in <strong>the</strong> numerous cases where it has been argued that aperiodic tenancy has arisen by implicati<strong>on</strong>. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, in moremodern times <strong>the</strong>re has <strong>of</strong>ten been no need to invoke it because <strong>the</strong>tenant has had statutory protecti<strong>on</strong> which arose up<strong>on</strong> expirati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>tenancy. 68 For all <strong>the</strong>se reas<strong>on</strong>s <strong>the</strong> Commissi<strong>on</strong> has c<strong>on</strong>siderabledoubts about <strong>the</strong> usefulness <strong>of</strong> secti<strong>on</strong> 5. The Commissi<strong>on</strong>6465666768See Earl <strong>of</strong> Meath v Megan [1897] 2 IR 477, 479 (per FitzGibb<strong>on</strong> LJ); also<strong>the</strong> discussi<strong>on</strong> by <strong>the</strong> Supreme Court in Irish Shell & BP Ltd v Costello Ltd[1984] IR 511.Per Gann<strong>on</strong> J in Eam<strong>on</strong>n Andrews Producti<strong>on</strong>s Ltd v Gaiety Theatre(Dublin) Ltd [1976-7] ILRM 119, 123. See also Dublin Corporati<strong>on</strong> vD<strong>on</strong>nelly High Court 29 April 1969, at 9 (per McLoughlin J).Nix<strong>on</strong> v Darby (1868) IR 2 CL 467; Doyle v Maguire (1884) 14 LR Ir 24.Phoenix Picture Palace Ltd v Capital & Allied Theatres Ltd [1951] Ir JurRep 55 (weekly tenancy); Esso Teoranta v W<strong>on</strong>g [1975] IR 416 (m<strong>on</strong>thlytenancy).Eg, under <strong>the</strong> old Rent Restricti<strong>on</strong> Acts <strong>the</strong> tenant became a “statutorytenant”: see Healy <strong>and</strong> Provisi<strong>on</strong>al Bank <strong>of</strong> Irel<strong>and</strong> v Armstr<strong>on</strong>g [1949] IrJur Rep 18; McCombe v Sheehan [1954] IR 183. As regards protecti<strong>on</strong>under <strong>the</strong> Housing (Private Rented Dwellings) Act 1982, see secti<strong>on</strong> 9 <strong>of</strong>that Act. Note also <strong>the</strong> protecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> tenants holding over pending finaldeterminati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> an applicati<strong>on</strong> for a new tenancy or reversi<strong>on</strong>ary leaseunder secti<strong>on</strong>s 28 <strong>and</strong> 40 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>L<strong>and</strong>lord</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Tenant</strong> (Amendment) Act1980.45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!