13.07.2015 Views

Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant

Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant

Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

secti<strong>on</strong> 10 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> C<strong>on</strong>veyancing Act 1881, which remains in forcehere. What appears to have been overlooked by <strong>the</strong> WestminsterParliament is that <strong>the</strong>re had already been enacted for Irel<strong>and</strong> astatutory provisi<strong>on</strong> to displace <strong>the</strong> comm<strong>on</strong> law, namely secti<strong>on</strong> 12 <strong>of</strong>Deasy’s Act.3.04 Secti<strong>on</strong> 12 <strong>of</strong> Deasy’s Act is a very comprehensiveprovisi<strong>on</strong>. 13 Indeed, secti<strong>on</strong> 12 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Act is so comprehensive that itwould seem to render redundant <strong>the</strong> provisi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> secti<strong>on</strong> 11 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Act. Secti<strong>on</strong> 11 relates to a particular category <strong>of</strong> obligati<strong>on</strong>frequently imposed <strong>on</strong> a tenant, namely those c<strong>on</strong>cerning assignmentor subletting. Secti<strong>on</strong> 12, however, seems to cover every category <strong>of</strong>obligati<strong>on</strong> entered into by a tenant. In essence it provides that,following an assignment by <strong>the</strong> tenant, <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong>lord, <strong>and</strong> anysuccessors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong>lord, can enforce <strong>the</strong> obligati<strong>on</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>tained in<strong>the</strong> tenancy against <strong>the</strong> assignee, <strong>and</strong> any successors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> assignee.The secti<strong>on</strong> does not c<strong>on</strong>tain any qualificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> obligati<strong>on</strong>s soenforceable, such as existed at comm<strong>on</strong> law or, later, under secti<strong>on</strong> 10<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> C<strong>on</strong>veyancing Act 1881, 14 <strong>and</strong> instead refers simply to “<strong>the</strong>agreements c<strong>on</strong>tained or implied in such lease or c<strong>on</strong>tract”. There is1314was held to have <strong>the</strong> same meaning as “touch <strong>and</strong> c<strong>on</strong>cern <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong>”: seeDavis v Town Properties Investment Co Ltd [1903] 1 Ch 797; BreamsProperty Investment Co Ltd v Stroulger [1948] 2 KB 1. It was carriedforward in Engl<strong>and</strong> in secti<strong>on</strong> 141 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>of</strong> Property Act 1925, butwas dropped from secti<strong>on</strong> 3 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>L<strong>and</strong>lord</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Tenant</strong> (Covenants) Act1995.See Wylie op cit paragraphs 21.22-23. Secti<strong>on</strong> 12 <strong>of</strong> Deasy’s Act states:Every l<strong>and</strong>lord <strong>of</strong> any l<strong>and</strong>s holden under any lease or o<strong>the</strong>r c<strong>on</strong>tract <strong>of</strong>tenancy shall have <strong>the</strong> same acti<strong>on</strong> or remedy against <strong>the</strong> tenant, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>assignee <strong>of</strong> his estate or interest, or <strong>the</strong>ir respective heirs, executors, oradministrators, in respect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> agreements c<strong>on</strong>tained or implied in suchlease or c<strong>on</strong>tract, as <strong>the</strong> original l<strong>and</strong>lord might have had against <strong>the</strong>original tenant, or his heir or pers<strong>on</strong>al representative respectively; <strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong> heir or pers<strong>on</strong>al representative <strong>of</strong> such l<strong>and</strong>lord <strong>on</strong> whom his estateor interest under any such lease or c<strong>on</strong>tract shall devolve or should havedevolved shall have <strong>the</strong> like acti<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> remedy against <strong>the</strong> tenant, <strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong> assignee <strong>of</strong> his estate or interest, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir respective heirs orpers<strong>on</strong>al representatives, for any damage d<strong>on</strong>e to <strong>the</strong> said estate orinterest <strong>of</strong> such l<strong>and</strong>lord by reas<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> breach <strong>of</strong> any agreementc<strong>on</strong>tained or implied in <strong>the</strong> lease or o<strong>the</strong>r c<strong>on</strong>tract <strong>of</strong> tenancy in <strong>the</strong>lifetime <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong>lord, as such l<strong>and</strong>lord himself might have had.”See paragraph 3.03 above.55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!