13.07.2015 Views

Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant

Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant

Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

overholding. 47 The Commissi<strong>on</strong> provisi<strong>on</strong>ally recommends thatsecti<strong>on</strong> 66 <strong>of</strong> Deasy’s Act ought to be extended to cover all cases <strong>of</strong>recovery <strong>of</strong> possessi<strong>on</strong> by <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong>lord <strong>the</strong>reby making it clear inevery instance that rent is recoverable up to <strong>the</strong> date possessi<strong>on</strong> isactually recovered.8.15 It may be appropriate to note in passing that secti<strong>on</strong> 46 <strong>of</strong>Deasy’s Act gives statutory recogniti<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> comm<strong>on</strong> law right <strong>of</strong> al<strong>and</strong>owner to recover “reas<strong>on</strong>able satisfacti<strong>on</strong>” (ie compensati<strong>on</strong>)where ano<strong>the</strong>r pers<strong>on</strong> is permitted to occupy <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong>, without anyagreement for payment <strong>of</strong> rent or o<strong>the</strong>r compensati<strong>on</strong>. This right <strong>of</strong>acti<strong>on</strong> for “use <strong>and</strong> occupati<strong>on</strong>” 48 should not be c<strong>on</strong>fused with <strong>the</strong>right to recover mesne pr<strong>of</strong>its or mesne rates against a trespasser. 49 Inessence <strong>the</strong> latter c<strong>on</strong>stitute damages awarded for <strong>the</strong> tort <strong>of</strong> trespass.Deasy’s Act appears to c<strong>on</strong>fuse <strong>the</strong> two distinct acti<strong>on</strong>s becausesecti<strong>on</strong> 77 provides for recovery <strong>of</strong> “rent or mesne pr<strong>of</strong>its” to <strong>the</strong> day<strong>of</strong> trial <strong>of</strong> an acti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> ejectment, yet, as pointed out earlier, secti<strong>on</strong> 66provides that “rent” is recoverable until <strong>the</strong> recovery <strong>of</strong> possessi<strong>on</strong>under any court order made at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trial <strong>of</strong> an acti<strong>on</strong> forejectment <strong>of</strong> n<strong>on</strong>-payment <strong>of</strong> rent. The Commissi<strong>on</strong> provisi<strong>on</strong>allyrecommends that <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>fusi<strong>on</strong> between an acti<strong>on</strong> for use <strong>and</strong>occupati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> an acti<strong>on</strong> for mesne pr<strong>of</strong>its or rates in Deasy’sAct should be cleared up.F Set-<strong>of</strong>f8.16 The issue <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> extent to which a tenant can set-<strong>of</strong>f againstor make deducti<strong>on</strong>s from a claim for rent by <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong>lord is governedby <strong>the</strong> somewhat ambiguous provisi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> secti<strong>on</strong> 48 <strong>of</strong> Deasy’s Act.One point <strong>of</strong> doubt is that <strong>the</strong> secti<strong>on</strong> refers to “[a]ll claims <strong>and</strong>dem<strong>and</strong>s” by <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong>lord in respect <strong>of</strong> rent but this has beeninterpreted as referring <strong>on</strong>ly to proceedings to recover rent qua rent,for example, in an acti<strong>on</strong> to recover rent brought under secti<strong>on</strong> 45. 5047484950See fur<strong>the</strong>r paragraph 15.07 below.Which can be applied to a wide range <strong>of</strong> occupiers, eg, a purchaser who isallowed into possessi<strong>on</strong> under a c<strong>on</strong>tract for sale which is later aborted: seeMarkey v Coote (1876) IR 10 CL 149. See Wylie op cit paragraph 12.13.See Wylie op cit paragraph 27.17.See paragraph 8.13 above. Secti<strong>on</strong> 48 <strong>of</strong> Deasy’s Act states:119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!