13.07.2015 Views

Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant

Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant

Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(e)(f)<strong>Tenant</strong> to be liable for increases in premiums relating tohazardous activities <strong>on</strong>ly if resp<strong>on</strong>sible for thoseactivities; 24<strong>Tenant</strong> to be under an obligati<strong>on</strong> not to do or permitanything to be d<strong>on</strong>e <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> demised premises which mightcause <strong>the</strong> insurance policy to become void or voidable, orwhich results in an increase in premiums; 25(g) Building’s insurance to be in joint names <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> parties, orto be expressed for <strong>the</strong> benefit <strong>of</strong> both, so as to avoid <strong>the</strong>tenant being faced with a subrogati<strong>on</strong> claim by <strong>the</strong>l<strong>and</strong>lord’s insurer, unless <strong>the</strong> insurer agrees to waivesubrogati<strong>on</strong> rights. 26The Commissi<strong>on</strong> provisi<strong>on</strong>ally recommends that a set <strong>of</strong> statutory“default” provisi<strong>on</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>cerning insurance cover, al<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> linesindicated, would be appropriate for all tenancies.242526This may be important in a multi-let development, where <strong>the</strong> hazardousactivities are carried <strong>on</strong> by o<strong>the</strong>r tenants in <strong>the</strong> development: ibidparagraph 16.15.Ibid paragraph 16.16. See also paragraph 11.08 above.It is not clear that <strong>the</strong> Irish courts will be as willing as <strong>the</strong> English courtshave been to assume that insurance arranged by <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong>lord is for <strong>the</strong>benefit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tenant as well: see Mark Rowl<strong>and</strong>s Ltd v Berni Inns Ltd[1985] 3 All ER 473; Lambert v Keymood Ltd [1997] 1 EGLR 70. CfAndrews v Patriotic Assurance Co <strong>of</strong> Irel<strong>and</strong> (No 2) (1886) 18 LR Ir 355,369 (per Palles CB).146

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!