13.07.2015 Views

Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant

Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant

Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12.11 There is <strong>on</strong>e fur<strong>the</strong>r, somewhat obscure, provisi<strong>on</strong> to bementi<strong>on</strong>ed <strong>and</strong> that is secti<strong>on</strong> 65 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> C<strong>on</strong>veyancing Act 1881. 38This is a provisi<strong>on</strong> which could be invoked very rarely because itapplies <strong>on</strong>ly to leases where <strong>the</strong> original term was not less than 300years, <strong>of</strong> which not less than 200 years remain outst<strong>and</strong>ing.Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore no rent must be payable or at most <strong>on</strong>ly a peppercornrent “or o<strong>the</strong>r rent having no m<strong>on</strong>ey value”. Alternatively, if asubstantial rent was originally reserved, it must have been releasedsubsequently, have become statute-barred or o<strong>the</strong>rwise ceased to bepayable. Nor can it apply if <strong>the</strong> lease c<strong>on</strong>tained a re-entry clause forbreach <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>. It is highly unlikely that many such leases existnowadays 39 <strong>and</strong> it is difficult to see why <strong>on</strong>e would be created. 40There was a short-lived practice <strong>of</strong> using it to avoid stamp duty in <strong>the</strong>1980s, but this was killed <strong>of</strong>f by <strong>the</strong> anti-avoidance provisi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong>secti<strong>on</strong> 96(2) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Finance Act 1986. 41 It has been argued that <strong>the</strong>secti<strong>on</strong> may be used to make covenants run with <strong>the</strong> enlarged freeholdinterest, which would not o<strong>the</strong>rwise run because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> restricti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> rule in Tulk v Moxhay, 42 but <strong>the</strong> Commissi<strong>on</strong> has alreadypublished separate recommendati<strong>on</strong>s to deal with this subject. 43 Inview <strong>of</strong> this <strong>the</strong> Commissi<strong>on</strong> inclines to <strong>the</strong> view that secti<strong>on</strong> 65 hasoutlived its usefulness. It will, however, revisit <strong>the</strong> subject when itreviews <strong>the</strong> ground rents legislati<strong>on</strong>. The Commissi<strong>on</strong> provisi<strong>on</strong>allyrecommends that secti<strong>on</strong> 65 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> C<strong>on</strong>veyancing Act 1881 should berepealed without replacement.383940414243It was amended slightly by secti<strong>on</strong> 11 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> C<strong>on</strong>veyancing Act 1882. SeeWylie op cit paragraphs 26.12-3.The secti<strong>on</strong> was menti<strong>on</strong>ed in <strong>the</strong> judgment <strong>of</strong> Kenny J in <strong>the</strong> unreportedcase <strong>of</strong> Atkins v Atkins High Court 30 March 1976.Note, however, that <strong>the</strong>re is a precedent (F.2.15) for using it in Laffoy’sIrish C<strong>on</strong>veyancing Precedents (Looseleaf Butterworths).See now secti<strong>on</strong> 35 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Stamp Duties C<strong>on</strong>solidati<strong>on</strong> Act 1999.Wylie Irish L<strong>and</strong> <strong>Law</strong> (3 rd ed Butterworths 1997) paragraphs 4.085-86;Taylor “Enlargement <strong>of</strong> Leasehold to Freehold” (1958) 22 C<strong>on</strong>v 101.Report <strong>on</strong> L<strong>and</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>and</strong> C<strong>on</strong>veyancing <strong>Law</strong>: (7) Positive Covenants overFreehold L<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Proposals (LRC 70–2003).154

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!