13.07.2015 Views

Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant

Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant

Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>the</strong>y should be regarded as arrangements <strong>of</strong> a different kind, such aslicences. The Commissi<strong>on</strong> provisi<strong>on</strong>ally recommends, <strong>the</strong>refore, thatit should be made clear by statute that <strong>the</strong> universal rule is that atenancy does not exist unless <strong>the</strong> occupier <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong> in questi<strong>on</strong> isobliged to pay rent or some o<strong>the</strong>r form <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> in return for<strong>the</strong> right to occupy. The legislati<strong>on</strong> should, however, specify anexcepti<strong>on</strong> to this rule to facilitate <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tinued creati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> mortgagesby demise or sub-demise, but no o<strong>the</strong>r excepti<strong>on</strong>s are c<strong>on</strong>templated.1.24 A point made in <strong>the</strong> previous paragraph raises <strong>the</strong> issue <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> status <strong>of</strong> so-called tenancies “at will” <strong>and</strong> “at sufferance”. Atenancy at will has l<strong>on</strong>g been recognised by <strong>the</strong> courts, but <strong>the</strong>y havehad c<strong>on</strong>siderable difficulty in determining its positi<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong> law <strong>of</strong>l<strong>and</strong>lord <strong>and</strong> tenant. 101 In essence it involves occupati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> for anindefinite period, with ei<strong>the</strong>r party entitled to end <strong>the</strong> arrangement atany time. 102 In its traditi<strong>on</strong>al form <strong>the</strong> relati<strong>on</strong>ship <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong>lord <strong>and</strong>tenant is said to exist, 103 yet it has <strong>of</strong>ten been stated that <strong>the</strong> “tenant”has no estate or interest in <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong>. 104 Again in its traditi<strong>on</strong>al form <strong>the</strong>occupati<strong>on</strong> by <strong>the</strong> tenant is rent free, 105 which is difficult to rec<strong>on</strong>cilewith <strong>the</strong> requirements <strong>of</strong> Deasy’s Act. 106 Not surprisingly it was heldthat such a tenant had no protecti<strong>on</strong> under <strong>the</strong> Rent Restricti<strong>on</strong> Acts. 107Given <strong>the</strong> Commissi<strong>on</strong>’s preliminary c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s with respect to both101102103104105106107See Wylie Irish <strong>L<strong>and</strong>lord</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Tenant</strong> <strong>Law</strong> (2 nd ed Butterworths 1998)paragraph 4.21 <strong>and</strong> following.Ward v Ryan (1875) IR 10 CL 17.See Bellew v Bellew [1982] IR 447, 460 (per O’Higgins CJ). Note that <strong>the</strong>majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Supreme Court in that case (Griffin <strong>and</strong> Hederman JJ) heldthat <strong>the</strong> occupier was a licensee.Wright v Tracey (1874) IR 8 CL 478, 489 (per Fitzgerald J); Brew vC<strong>on</strong>ole (1875) IR 9 CL 151, 156 (per Dowse B).Payment <strong>of</strong> rent tends to lead <strong>the</strong> court to c<strong>on</strong>clude that <strong>the</strong> tenancy is aperiodic tenancy, <strong>the</strong> category (weekly, m<strong>on</strong>thly, etc) depending <strong>on</strong> how<strong>the</strong> rent is calculated: see Fahy v O’D<strong>on</strong>nell (1870) IR 4 CL 332 (perKeogh J).Paragraph 1.22 above.Delany (Blanchardstown Mills Ltd) v J<strong>on</strong>es [1938] IR 826; Irish Sailors’<strong>and</strong> Soldiers’ L<strong>and</strong> Trust v D<strong>on</strong>nelly [1944] IR 464. See fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>on</strong> caselawinvolving <strong>the</strong> Irish Sailors’ <strong>and</strong> Soldiers’ L<strong>and</strong> Trust, Wylie op cit atparagraph 4.23.23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!