13.07.2015 Views

Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant

Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant

Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

preliminary c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong> that any re-enactment or replacement <strong>of</strong>secti<strong>on</strong> 3 <strong>of</strong> Deasy’s Act should be a provisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> universalapplicati<strong>on</strong>, that is, applying to all tenancies, <strong>and</strong> should say soexplicitly.1.18 In a recent English case, in <strong>the</strong> House <strong>of</strong> Lords 70 it wasstated that a lease simply describes <strong>the</strong> relati<strong>on</strong>ship between twoparties <strong>and</strong>, somewhat surprisingly, is not c<strong>on</strong>cerned with <strong>the</strong> questi<strong>on</strong>whe<strong>the</strong>r an estate or proprietary interest binding third parties has beencreated. 71 Thus it was held that a body, which itself had <strong>on</strong>ly a licenceto use property, had created a tenancy in favour <strong>of</strong> a pers<strong>on</strong> it had letinto temporary occupati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> property. Yet because <strong>the</strong>grantor did not itself have an estate or interest in <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong> (it had alicence <strong>on</strong>ly), it was recognised that <strong>the</strong> “tenant” in occupati<strong>on</strong> hadn<strong>on</strong>e – nemo dat quod n<strong>on</strong> habet. 72 Never<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong> tenant was heldentitled to claim statutory rights attaching to tenants <strong>and</strong> not to o<strong>the</strong>roccupiers <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong>. 73 The Commissi<strong>on</strong> has c<strong>on</strong>siderable doubts about<strong>the</strong> reas<strong>on</strong>ing in this case 74 <strong>and</strong> even more doubts about policyc<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>s relating to <strong>the</strong> applicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> statutory rights. 75 It alsoseems to raise <strong>the</strong> prospect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> courts recognising ano<strong>the</strong>r type <strong>of</strong>dual system <strong>of</strong> tenancies, namely those which create an estate orinterest in <strong>the</strong> tenant <strong>and</strong> those which do not, but which c<strong>on</strong>fer someattributes <strong>of</strong> a tenancy <strong>of</strong> an uncertain scope. Again <strong>the</strong> Commissi<strong>on</strong>regards this as a recipe for uncertainty <strong>and</strong> c<strong>on</strong>fusi<strong>on</strong>. 76 TheCommissi<strong>on</strong> has reached <strong>the</strong> preliminary c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong> that Irish law70717273747576Brut<strong>on</strong> v L<strong>on</strong>d<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> Quadrant Housing Trust [2000] 1 AC 406.See especially <strong>the</strong> speech <strong>of</strong> Lord H<strong>of</strong>fmann.A pers<strong>on</strong> cannot give to some<strong>on</strong>e else what that pers<strong>on</strong> does not hold.Implied repairing obligati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> l<strong>and</strong>lords under secti<strong>on</strong> 11 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> English<strong>L<strong>and</strong>lord</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Tenant</strong> Act 1985.For discussi<strong>on</strong>, which also c<strong>on</strong>tains some criticism, see Rook [1999] C<strong>on</strong>v517; Morgan [1999] C<strong>on</strong>v 493; Routley (2000) 63 MLR 424. See alsoEvans <strong>and</strong> Smith The <strong>Law</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>L<strong>and</strong>lord</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Tenant</strong> (6 th ed Butterworths2002) at 10.In particular it seems clear that <strong>the</strong> result was <strong>the</strong> reverse <strong>of</strong> what all <strong>the</strong>parties involved intended or c<strong>on</strong>templated: see fur<strong>the</strong>r paragraph 1.29below.The Commissi<strong>on</strong> is not, <strong>the</strong>refore, in favour <strong>of</strong> a provisi<strong>on</strong> such as thatc<strong>on</strong>tained in secti<strong>on</strong> 35 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> British Columbia <strong>L<strong>and</strong>lord</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Tenant</strong> Act,RSBC 1979 (c 207): see paragraph 1.10 footnote 34 above.18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!