13.07.2015 Views

Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant

Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant

Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

for a lease or tenancy, like all o<strong>the</strong>r c<strong>on</strong>tracts for <strong>the</strong> sale or o<strong>the</strong>rdispositi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> an interest in l<strong>and</strong> are governed by secti<strong>on</strong> 2 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Statute <strong>of</strong> Frauds (Irel<strong>and</strong>) 1695. 5 The actual grant <strong>of</strong> a lease ortenancy is governed by secti<strong>on</strong> 4 <strong>of</strong> Deasy’s Act. 6 It is true that <strong>the</strong>rewas some doubt <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> point shortly after <strong>the</strong> enactment <strong>of</strong> Deasy’sAct, largely because secti<strong>on</strong> 3 ra<strong>the</strong>r c<strong>on</strong>fused matters by founding <strong>the</strong>relati<strong>on</strong>ship <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong>lord <strong>and</strong> tenant <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> express or implied“c<strong>on</strong>tract” <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> parties. Secti<strong>on</strong> 3 <strong>the</strong>n went <strong>on</strong> to state that <strong>the</strong>relati<strong>on</strong>ship would be deemed to subsist in all cases in which <strong>the</strong>rewas “an agreement” by <strong>on</strong>e party to hold l<strong>and</strong> from or under ano<strong>the</strong>rin c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> any rent. 7 However, <strong>the</strong> essential point is thatwhile Deasy’s Act repealed 8 secti<strong>on</strong> 1 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1695 Statute, which dealtwith grants <strong>of</strong> leases or tenancies, 9 it did not repeal secti<strong>on</strong> 2.Suggesti<strong>on</strong>s 10 that <strong>the</strong>re was some sort <strong>of</strong> implied repeal wereeventually rejected as unsound 11 <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re have since been numerousIrish cases accepting <strong>the</strong> propositi<strong>on</strong> that c<strong>on</strong>tracts for leases ortenancies remain governed by <strong>the</strong> 1695 Statute. 122.04 The reference above to <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>fusi<strong>on</strong> caused by <strong>the</strong> wording<strong>of</strong> secti<strong>on</strong> 3 <strong>of</strong> Deasy’s Act 13 raises a more general issue to which <strong>the</strong>5678910111213See generally Farrell Irish <strong>Law</strong> <strong>of</strong> Specific Performance (Butterworths1994) Chapter 5; Wylie Irish C<strong>on</strong>veyancing <strong>Law</strong> (2 nd ed Butterworths1996) Chapter 6.See Wylie Irish <strong>L<strong>and</strong>lord</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Tenant</strong> <strong>Law</strong> (2 nd ed Butterworths 1998)paragraph 5.26 <strong>and</strong> following.The operati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> secti<strong>on</strong> 3 was c<strong>on</strong>sidered in detail in Chapter 1 above.Secti<strong>on</strong> 104 <strong>and</strong> Schedule (B).Requiring <strong>the</strong>m to be in writing if for a term exceeding 3 years. Suchgrants are now governed by secti<strong>on</strong> 4 <strong>of</strong> Deasy’s Act: see paragraph 2.10below.See <strong>the</strong> judgment <strong>of</strong> M<strong>on</strong>ahan CJ in Bayley v C<strong>on</strong>yngham (1863) 15 ICLR406 (especially at 413).Note <strong>the</strong> trenchant reas<strong>on</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> Christian J in Bayley v C<strong>on</strong>yngham whichseems unassailable op cit at 416-417.Eg Leslie v Crommelin (1867) IR 2 Eq 134; Waldr<strong>on</strong> v Jacob (1870) IR 5Eq 131; R<strong>on</strong>ayne v Sherrard (1877) IR 11 CL 146; McCausl<strong>and</strong> v Murphy(1881) 9 LR Ir 9; Hughes v Fanagan (1891) 30 LR Ir 111.The c<strong>on</strong>fusi<strong>on</strong> was compounded by <strong>the</strong> wording <strong>of</strong> secti<strong>on</strong> 4 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Act,which was clearly intended to deal with <strong>the</strong> actual grant <strong>of</strong> a lease ortenancy: see paragraph 2.03 (<strong>and</strong> footnote 9) above. Secti<strong>on</strong> 4 refers to34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!