13.07.2015 Views

Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant

Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant

Consultation Paper on the General Law of the Landlord and Tenant

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

within <strong>the</strong> purview <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>L<strong>and</strong>lord</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Tenant</strong> Project <strong>and</strong> c<strong>on</strong>sidersthat <strong>the</strong>y should be reviewed in <strong>the</strong>ir respective c<strong>on</strong>texts, as part <strong>of</strong> ageneral review <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> law <strong>and</strong> c<strong>on</strong>veyancing law. 53 However, it doeswish to draw attenti<strong>on</strong> to related provisi<strong>on</strong>s, which are <strong>the</strong> Leases Acts1849 <strong>and</strong> 1850. 54 These short Acts purport to save leases which fail tocomply with statutory requirements such as those menti<strong>on</strong>ed above,by giving <strong>the</strong> lessee <strong>the</strong> opti<strong>on</strong> to treat <strong>the</strong> invalid lease as a c<strong>on</strong>tractto grant a valid <strong>on</strong>e. The provisi<strong>on</strong>s are hedged with limitati<strong>on</strong>s 55 <strong>and</strong>restricti<strong>on</strong>s 56 <strong>and</strong> are <strong>of</strong> uncertain scope. Thus it has been held by <strong>the</strong>English courts that <strong>the</strong>y apply <strong>on</strong>ly where <strong>the</strong> invalidity relates tosome minor or technical flaw in <strong>the</strong> exercise <strong>of</strong> statutory leasingpowers. 57 Arguably this casts doubts <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> policy behind <strong>the</strong> Acts; itis somewhat odd to have statutory provisi<strong>on</strong>s which seem toundermine o<strong>the</strong>r statutory requirements. 58 In any event, <strong>the</strong>Commissi<strong>on</strong> takes <strong>the</strong> view that <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>sequences <strong>of</strong> failure tocomply with a particular set <strong>of</strong> statutory requirements for <strong>the</strong> exercise<strong>of</strong> leasing (or, indeed, any o<strong>the</strong>r kind <strong>of</strong>) powers should be spelt out in<strong>the</strong> statute c<strong>on</strong>ferring those powers. If that were d<strong>on</strong>e <strong>the</strong>re would beno need for provisi<strong>on</strong>s like <strong>the</strong> Leases Acts 1849 <strong>and</strong> 1850. On thatbasis <strong>the</strong> Commissi<strong>on</strong> has reached <strong>the</strong> provisi<strong>on</strong>al c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong> that <strong>the</strong>Leases Acts 1849 <strong>and</strong> 1850 should be repealed without replacement.535455565758This will occur in any event as part <strong>of</strong> a review <strong>of</strong> pre-1922 propertystatutes currently being undertaken: see paragraph 2.09 footnote 28 above.See Wylie op cit paragraph 5.47.For some unclear reas<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> Acts do not apply to leases <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> held <strong>on</strong>charitable, ecclesiastical or public trusts.The Acts can be invoked <strong>on</strong>ly if <strong>the</strong> invalid lease was made in good faith<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> lessee has taken possessi<strong>on</strong> under it: see M<strong>of</strong>fett v Lord Gough(1878) 1 LR Ir 331.Kisch v Hawes Bros [1935] Ch 102; Ir<strong>on</strong> Trades Employers InsuranceAssociati<strong>on</strong> Ltd v Uni<strong>on</strong> L<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> House Investors Ltd [1937] Ch 313;Davies v Hall [1954] 1 WLR 855; Paws<strong>on</strong> v Revell [1958] 2 QB 360.The Irish courts are not usually sympa<strong>the</strong>tic to a failure to comply withsuch statutory requirements: see, eg, Hughes v Fanagan (1891) 31 LR Ir111 (Settled L<strong>and</strong> Acts) <strong>and</strong> ICC Bank plc v Verling [1995] 1 ILRM 123(lease <strong>of</strong> mortgaged l<strong>and</strong>).43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!