Appendix F – Sediment Pore Water Sampling TechniquesThe following briefly describes some <strong>of</strong> the more recent tools and methods used for thecollection <strong>of</strong> sediment pore water samples. A detailed discussion <strong>of</strong> each method is beyondthe scope <strong>of</strong> this guidance. Rather, this section is intended to simply introduce thesemethods and provide references for their use and interpretation <strong>of</strong> data generated.Ultimately, the use <strong>of</strong> these methods should result in a more accurate measure <strong>of</strong> sitespecificcontaminant bioavailability or toxicity to sediment dwelling organisms.Diffusion Samplers:Diffusion-based samplers consist <strong>of</strong> a semipermeable membrane or dialysis tube filled withdistilled water, purified fish oil (triolein) or a gel, which rely on a solute gradient toestablish equilibrium between the pore water and the sampler. Diffusion samplers are <strong>of</strong>tenused in situ for measuring metals, phosphates, and sulfides. Some <strong>of</strong> the more commonsamplers for in situ diffusion include the following:• Peepers: A sampling device, also referred to as a dialysis cell, which consists <strong>of</strong> a rigidstructure that can hold volumes <strong>of</strong> distilled or deionized water separated from theenvironment by a porous membrane. Holes within the rigid structure allow pore waterand associated contaminants to pass through the membrane, allowing the cell to passivelyequilibrate with the surrounding pore water. These samplers are capable <strong>of</strong> monitoringmost compounds (inorganic and organic) present in dissolved phases (ITRC, 2005).• Semi-Permeable Membrane Devices (SPMD): SPMDs are fat- or lipid-filled membranesthat attempt to mimic uptake into benthos or fish in terms <strong>of</strong> HOC (hydrophobic organicchemical) absorption to lipids in aquatic organisms (Zimmerman, et al., 2000). SPMDsconsist <strong>of</strong> a high molecular weight lipid (typically triolein) that is placed into apolyethylene membrane tube. The device may be placed in a perforated stainless steeldeployment device to provide protection when placed in sediment (USEPA, n.d.).• Diffusive gradient in thin films (DGT): DGTs are another type <strong>of</strong> diffusion sampler, andrefers to two similar tools for collecting metals from sediment pore water (Davison et al.,2000). DGTs differ from other diffusive samplers in that they are typically casings filledwith gels that are specific to the target compound (e.g. a Chelex or acrylamide gel formetals, ferrous-oxide gel for phosphorus). The unique advantage <strong>of</strong> DGTs over otherdiffusive samplers is that after retrieval, the gel can be cut into segments for multipleanalyses.Equilibrium Samplers:Equilibrium samplers are used to measure the pore water concentrations <strong>of</strong> freely dissolvedhydrophobic organic compounds (e.g., PCBs, PAHs). These types <strong>of</strong> samplers can bedeployed in situ (e.g., directly into the sediment) where they accumulate contaminants fromthe pore water, while others are used to extract small quantities <strong>of</strong> contaminants fromextracted pore water.• Solid Phase Microextraction Devices (SPME): This technique, used to establish PAHpore water concentrations, involves using thin silica fibers coated with an organicpolymer. The fibers can be exposed to sediment pore water in situ or in a laboratorysetting. The freely dissolved hydrophobic organic contamination is sorbed onto theSMPE fiber, which is then injected into a GS/MS for analysis. The direct pore water<strong>Ecological</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Guidance</strong> Document 117Version 1.2 8/29/12
esults are then evaluated using USEPA’s hydrocarbon narcosis model (USEPA, 2003).It has been documented that the ability <strong>of</strong> the SPME method to predict toxicity correlatewell with toxicity observed with standard sediment toxicity tests. This technique wasmore reliable at predicting PAH impacts than were those found through the use <strong>of</strong> bulkPAH concentrations and Equilibrium Partitioning (EqP) to estimate pore waterconcentrations (Moles et al., 2006; Hawthorne et al., 2007). The method recentlybecame standardized (USEPA SW-846 Method 8272/ASTM provisional standardD7363-07) and incorporated into USEPA’s document titled Evaluating <strong>Ecological</strong> Riskto Invertebrate Receptors from PAHs in Sediments at Hazardous Waste Sites (2009d).http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=214715• Polyethylene (PE) and polyoxymethylene (POM) samplers: These samplers are similarto SPMEs in their ability to sorb organic compounds from sediments. A principaladvantage <strong>of</strong> using these samplers is their ability to come into equilibrium faster thanSPMEs. Recent work has shown that uptake <strong>of</strong> PAH and PCBs by PE and POMsamplers correlate with benthic organism uptake (Tomasaewski and Luthy, 2008).Centrifugation:Centrifugation is another method used for the collection <strong>of</strong> pore water samples. Thismethod involves placing bulk sediments in a large-capacity centrifuge (e.g., a bucket-stylecentrifuge with one liter capacity per sample) and centrifuging them at low speed (e.g.,7,400 x gravitational force) for 15 to 30 minutes (ASTM, 2000; Environment Canada,1994). In some cases, subsequent high-speed centrifugation (e.g., 10,000 x gravitationalforce) may be necessary or desirable, particularly if the selected test species have lowtolerance to suspended particles. Centrifugation requires the collection <strong>of</strong> a large volume<strong>of</strong> sediment to extract a sufficient amount <strong>of</strong> pore water suitable for analysis, <strong>of</strong>tencontributing to elevated method detection limits (MDLs).Additional Pore Water Sampling Devices:One additional pore water sampling device that is unique in that it measures threeparameters is the US Navy’s Trident probe. The Trident probe is a flexible, multi-sensor,water-sampling probe for screening and mapping groundwater plumes at the surface waterinterface. The probe has the ability to measure conductivity, temperature, and pore water,and is well-suited for spatially identifying where groundwater is discharging to surfacewater. Once the groundwater and surface water discharge is located, pore water samplescan be collected to chemically characterize the contamination.http://meso.spawar.navy.mil/Capabilities/Trident/index.html<strong>Ecological</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Guidance</strong> Document 118Version 1.2 8/29/12
- Page 1 and 2:
Ecological EvaluationTechnical Guid
- Page 3 and 4:
6.2.1.3 Biological Sampling of Fish
- Page 5 and 6:
Acronyms and AbbreviationsADDAETAFA
- Page 7 and 8:
Executive SummaryThis document prov
- Page 9 and 10:
environmentally sensitive areas pur
- Page 11 and 12:
Figure 3-1: Flow diagram to describ
- Page 13 and 14:
assessment may also include evaluat
- Page 15 and 16:
“Hazard quotient” or “HQ” m
- Page 17 and 18:
“Site investigation” means the
- Page 19 and 20:
parameters as specified in ERAGS (i
- Page 21 and 22:
document otherwise). The investigat
- Page 23 and 24:
5.3.2.1 Potential Contaminant Migra
- Page 25 and 26:
71 0Sampling pointsSampling transec
- Page 27 and 28:
5.3.4 Background ConsiderationsIt i
- Page 29 and 30:
III. GroundwaterAnalytical data fro
- Page 31 and 32:
5.5 Ecological Evaluation ReportThe
- Page 33 and 34:
Step 1 - Preliminary Screening Leve
- Page 35 and 36:
specific measurements of receptor h
- Page 37 and 38:
Figure 6-2: Ecological Conceptual S
- Page 39 and 40:
ingested, air inhaled, or material
- Page 41 and 42:
Fugacity, which is described as the
- Page 43 and 44:
environment. As noted in ERAGS, the
- Page 45 and 46:
Sample SelectionAfter completing th
- Page 47 and 48:
While there are many laboratories t
- Page 49 and 50:
ioavailability, and by doing so, of
- Page 51 and 52:
For the purposes of surface water,
- Page 53 and 54:
higher trophic level receptors. Lip
- Page 55 and 56:
Details regarding surface water tox
- Page 57 and 58:
e present at intervals greater than
- Page 59 and 60:
elatively sedentary organisms that
- Page 61 and 62:
COPECs. The following references ar
- Page 63 and 64:
tests (USEPA, 2002e). After collect
- Page 65 and 66:
multiple reference area soils repre
- Page 67 and 68: In ERAs, tissue residue analyses ar
- Page 69 and 70: Objectives of the ERA: including a
- Page 71 and 72: evaluation might necessitate the co
- Page 73 and 74: N.J.A.C. 7:26E-4.8(c)1. The ERA may
- Page 75 and 76: sediment (i.e., that fraction that
- Page 77 and 78: Twelve dioxin-like PCB congeners ha
- Page 79 and 80: indicates burial of potential dioxi
- Page 81 and 82: of evidence for evaluating risk unt
- Page 83 and 84: 7.2.1 Apparent Effects Threshold Ap
- Page 85 and 86: when site conditions are most simil
- Page 87 and 88: destroying 10 acres of the mature f
- Page 89 and 90: ASTM (American Society for Testing
- Page 91 and 92: Establishing Sediment Quality Crite
- Page 93 and 94: N.J.A.C. (New Jersey Administrative
- Page 95 and 96: USEPA. 1989c. Risk Assessment Guida
- Page 97 and 98: http://www.epa.gov/owow/oceans/regu
- Page 99 and 100: USEPA 2006a. Data Quality Assessmen
- Page 101 and 102: Appendix A - Habitat Survey FormsEc
- Page 103 and 104: Ecological Evaluation Technical Gui
- Page 105 and 106: Appendix B - Sampling Procedures fo
- Page 107 and 108: Appendix C - Surface Water Toxicity
- Page 109 and 110: Short-term chronic studies, endpoin
- Page 111 and 112: Appendix D - Sediment Toxicity Test
- Page 113 and 114: Toxicity Test DesignSediment toxici
- Page 115 and 116: Appendix E - Sediment Pore Water an
- Page 117: The seven-day daphnid survival and
- Page 121 and 122: Surber or Square-foot BottomThis sa
- Page 123 and 124: Appendix H - Soil Toxicity TestingS
- Page 125 and 126: another sample may still have a sub
- Page 127 and 128: conservative approach from an ecolo
- Page 129: Data PresentationTabular presentati