Ecological Evaluation Technical Guidance - State of New Jersey

More documents

Recommendations

Info

USEPA. 2002c. Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents andReceiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition, October 2002. USEPAOffice of Water, Washington, DC. EPA-821-R-02-013.http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/methods/wet/upload/2007_07_10_methods_wet_disk3_ctf.pdfUSEPA. 2002d. Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents andReceiving Waters to Marine and Estuarine Organisms. Third Edition, October 2002.USEPA Office of Water, Washington, DC. EPA-821-R-02-014.http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/methods/wet/upload/2007_07_10_methods_wet_disk1_ctm.pdfUSEPA. 2002e. A Guidance Manual to Support the Assessment of ContaminatedSediments in Freshwater Ecosystems. Volume III – Interpretation of the Results ofSediment Quality Investigations. December 2002. USEPA Great Lakes NationalProgram Office, Chicago, IL. EPA-905-B02-001-C.http://www.cerc.usgs.gov/pubs/sedtox/VolumeIII.pdfUSEPA. 2002f. Methods for Evaluating Wetland Condition: Using Vegetation ToAssess Environmental Conditions in Wetlands. EPA-822-R-02-020. Office of Water,USEPA, Washington, DC.USEPA. 2002g. Guidance on Environmental Data Verification and Data Validation.Office of Environmental Information, Washington, DC. EPA QA /G-8. EPA/240/R-02/004. http://www.epa.gov/quality/qs-docs/g8-final.pdfUSEPA. 2003. Procedures for the Derivation of Equilibrium Partitioning SedimentBenchmarks (ESBs) for the Protection of Benthic Organisms: PAH Mixtures. USEPA,Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC. EPA-600-R-02-013.http://www.epa.gov/nheerl/publications/files/PAHESB.pdfUSEPA. 2004. Data Quality Assessment: A Reviewer’s Guide. EPA QA/G-9R. EPA-240-B-06-002. Office of Environmental Information, Washington, DC.http://www.epa.gov/quality/qs-docs/g9r-final.pdfUSEPA. 2005a. Guidance for Developing Ecological Soil Screening Levels (Eco-SSL).OSWER Directive 9285.7-55. Including Attachments 4-2 through 4-5. November 2003.Revised February 2005. http://www.epa.gov/ecotox/ecossl/.USEPA. 2005b. Procedures for the Derivation of Equilibrium Partitioning SedimentBenchmarks (ESBs) for the Protection of Benthic Organisms: Metal Mixtures (cadmium,copper, lead, nickel, silver, zinc). EPA/600/R-02/011. Office of Research andDevelopment, Washington, DC.USEPA. 2005c. Uniform Federal Policy for Quality Assurance Project Plans.Evaluating, Assessing, and Documenting Environmental Data Collection and UsePrograms. Part 1: UFP-QAPP Manual. Final Version 1. March 2005.Intergovernmental Data Quality Task Force (USEPA, US Department of Defense, USDepartment of Energy). EPA 505-B-04-900A.http://www.epa.gov/fedfac/pdf/ufp_qapp_v1_0305.pdfEcological Evaluation Technical Guidance Document 97Version 1.2 8/29/12
USEPA 2006a. Data Quality Assessment: Statistical Methods for Practitioners.USEPA QA/G-9S. http://www.epa.gov/quality/qs-docs/g9s-final.pdfUSEPA. 2006b. Guidance on Systematic Planning Using the Data Quality ObjectivesProcess, USEPA QA/G-4, 2006, EPA-240-B-06-001, Office of EnvironmentalInformation., Washington, DC. http://www.epa.gov/quality/qs-docs/g4-final.pdfUSEPA. 2006c. Data Quality Assessment: Statistical Methods for Practitioners. EPAQA/G-9S. EPA-240-B-06-003. Office of Environmental Information., Washington, DC.http://www.epa.gov/quality/qs-docs/g9s-final.pdfUSEPA. 2008a. Evaluating Ground-Water/Surface-Water Transition Zones inEcological Risk Assessments. Eco Update/Ground Water Forum Issue Paper. Office ofSolid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, DC. EPA-540-R-06-072.http://epa.gov/osa/raf/tefframework/pdfs/tefs-draft-052808.pdfUSEPA. 2008b. Framework for Application of the Toxicity Equivalence Methodologyfor Polychlorinated Dioxins, Furans, and Biphenyls in Ecological Risk Assessment.Office of Science Advisor, Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, DC. EPA-100-R-08-004. http://epa.gov/osa/raf/tefframework/pdfs/tefs-draft-052808.pdfUSEPA. 2008c. Ecological Risk Assessment Step 3. USEPA Region V, Chicago, IL.http://www.epa.gov/R5Super/ecology/html/erasteps/erastep3.html#csmUSEPA. 2009a. ProUCL Version 4.00.04 Technical Guide. Office of Research andDevelopment, Washington, DC.http://www.epa.gov/esd/tsc/ProUCL_v4.00.04/ProUCL_v4.00.04_tech_guide.pdfUSEPA. 2009b. ProUCL software. Version 4.00.04. USEPA Technical Support Center.http://www.epa.gov/esd/tsc/TSC_form.htmUSEPA. 2009c. Estimation of Biota Sediment Accumulation Factor (BSAF) FromPaired Observations of Chemical Concentrations in Biota and Sediment. USEPA, Officeof Research and Development, Duluth, MN. EPA/600/R-06/047, February 2009.http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=205446#DownloadUSEPA. 2009d. Burgess, R.M. Evaluating Ecological Risk to Invertebrate Receptorsfrom PAHs in Sediments at Hazardous Waste Sites. USEPA, Ecological Risk AssessmentSupport Center, Cincinnati, OH. EPA-600-R-06-162F. October 2009.http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=214715#DownloadUSEPA. 2011. Ecological Soil Screening Level (Eco-SSL). USEPA. February 10, 2011.http://www.epa.gov/ecotox/ecossl/USEPA/USACE (United States Environmental Protection Agency and United StatesArmy Corps of Engineers). 1991. Evaluation of Dredged Material Proposed for OceanDisposal, Testing Manual. USEPA Office of Water, Washington, DC. EPA 503/8-91/001.USEPA/USACE (United States Environmental Protection Agency and United StatesArmy Corps of Engineers). 1998. Evaluation of Dredged Material Proposed forDischarge in Waters of the U.S. - Testing Manual (Inland Testing Manual). USEPAOffice of Water, Washington, DC. EPA-823-B-98-004.Ecological Evaluation Technical Guidance Document 98Version 1.2 8/29/12
Page 1 and 2:
Ecological EvaluationTechnical Guid
Page 3 and 4:
6.2.1.3 Biological Sampling of Fish
Page 5 and 6:
Acronyms and AbbreviationsADDAETAFA
Page 7 and 8:
Executive SummaryThis document prov
Page 9 and 10:
environmentally sensitive areas pur
Page 11 and 12:
Figure 3-1: Flow diagram to describ
Page 13 and 14:
assessment may also include evaluat
Page 15 and 16:
“Hazard quotient” or “HQ” m
Page 17 and 18:
“Site investigation” means the
Page 19 and 20:
parameters as specified in ERAGS (i
Page 21 and 22:
document otherwise). The investigat
Page 23 and 24:
5.3.2.1 Potential Contaminant Migra
Page 25 and 26:
71 0Sampling pointsSampling transec
Page 27 and 28:
5.3.4 Background ConsiderationsIt i
Page 29 and 30:
III. GroundwaterAnalytical data fro
Page 31 and 32:
5.5 Ecological Evaluation ReportThe
Page 33 and 34:
Step 1 - Preliminary Screening Leve
Page 35 and 36:
specific measurements of receptor h
Page 37 and 38:
Figure 6-2: Ecological Conceptual S
Page 39 and 40:
ingested, air inhaled, or material
Page 41 and 42:
Fugacity, which is described as the
Page 43 and 44:
environment. As noted in ERAGS, the
Page 45 and 46:
Sample SelectionAfter completing th
Page 47 and 48: While there are many laboratories t
Page 49 and 50: ioavailability, and by doing so, of
Page 51 and 52: For the purposes of surface water,
Page 53 and 54: higher trophic level receptors. Lip
Page 55 and 56: Details regarding surface water tox
Page 57 and 58: e present at intervals greater than
Page 59 and 60: elatively sedentary organisms that
Page 61 and 62: COPECs. The following references ar
Page 63 and 64: tests (USEPA, 2002e). After collect
Page 65 and 66: multiple reference area soils repre
Page 67 and 68: In ERAs, tissue residue analyses ar
Page 69 and 70: Objectives of the ERA: including a
Page 71 and 72: evaluation might necessitate the co
Page 73 and 74: N.J.A.C. 7:26E-4.8(c)1. The ERA may
Page 75 and 76: sediment (i.e., that fraction that
Page 77 and 78: Twelve dioxin-like PCB congeners ha
Page 79 and 80: indicates burial of potential dioxi
Page 81 and 82: of evidence for evaluating risk unt
Page 83 and 84: 7.2.1 Apparent Effects Threshold Ap
Page 85 and 86: when site conditions are most simil
Page 87 and 88: destroying 10 acres of the mature f
Page 89 and 90: ASTM (American Society for Testing
Page 91 and 92: Establishing Sediment Quality Crite
Page 93 and 94: N.J.A.C. (New Jersey Administrative
Page 95 and 96: USEPA. 1989c. Risk Assessment Guida
Page 97: http://www.epa.gov/owow/oceans/regu
Page 101 and 102: Appendix A - Habitat Survey FormsEc
Page 103 and 104: Ecological Evaluation Technical Gui
Page 105 and 106: Appendix B - Sampling Procedures fo
Page 107 and 108: Appendix C - Surface Water Toxicity
Page 109 and 110: Short-term chronic studies, endpoin
Page 111 and 112: Appendix D - Sediment Toxicity Test
Page 113 and 114: Toxicity Test DesignSediment toxici
Page 115 and 116: Appendix E - Sediment Pore Water an
Page 117 and 118: The seven-day daphnid survival and
Page 119 and 120: esults are then evaluated using USE
Page 121 and 122: Surber or Square-foot BottomThis sa
Page 123 and 124: Appendix H - Soil Toxicity TestingS
Page 125 and 126: another sample may still have a sub
Page 127 and 128: conservative approach from an ecolo
Page 129: Data PresentationTabular presentati
show all

Ecological Evaluation Technical Guidance - State of New Jersey

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?