13.07.2015 Views

Ecological Evaluation Technical Guidance - State of New Jersey

Ecological Evaluation Technical Guidance - State of New Jersey

Ecological Evaluation Technical Guidance - State of New Jersey

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

al., 1996; USEPA 1994a, 2003). The equilibrium partitioning (EqP) model,widely used for many years, measures bioavailability by calculating a porewater concentration. It is assumed that equilibrium exists between thecontaminants sorbed to the bulk sediment (organic carbon) and the sedimentpore water as expressed in following equation:C W = C S / f OC K OCSediment pore water concentrations (C W ) are derived through a calculationwhereby the bulk sediment concentration (C S ) is divided by the fraction <strong>of</strong>organic carbon (f OC ) times the organic carbon partition coefficient (K OC ).Toxicity in sediments can be estimated by comparing the derived pore waterconcentration to effects concentrations previously measured in water-onlyexposures (e.g. USEPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria).While the use <strong>of</strong> EqP is considered to provide a more accurate measure <strong>of</strong>bioavailability (toxicity) than simply screening bulk sediment data againstscreening values, more recent advancements in pore water sampling havemade it possible to measure site-specific bioavailability at an even greateraccuracy. Many <strong>of</strong> these methods have the advantage <strong>of</strong> directly measuringpore water, and thus reduce the inherent uncertainty associated withcalculating a pore water concentration via a model. Details regardingsediment pore water sampling techniques can be found in Appendix F.Groundwater to Surface Water Discharges:Contaminated groundwater that discharges to surface water also has thepotential to impact the pore water present in the interstitial space <strong>of</strong> sediment.Historically, measuring chemicals in groundwater that discharges to surfacewater was evaluated via groundwater monitoring wells positioned along theshoreline, through mass-balance equations designed to model dischargeconcentrations, or through the analysis <strong>of</strong> grab surface water samples.However, these methods do not accurately characterize the pore watercontaminant levels in the sediment in the biotic zone where the majority <strong>of</strong> thebenthic organisms reside.More recently, methods have been developed to sample tidal and subaqueousgroundwater discharges to a water body (Chadwick and Hawkins, 2008;Chadwick et al., 2003; Duncan et al., 2007a, b). These tools include intertidalseep sampling, piezometers, and diver-deployed diffusion samplers. Thereferences provide a detailed description <strong>of</strong> the tools and measures applicableto measuring COPECs in groundwater and pore water. Additionally, theUSEPA has released a document stressing the importance <strong>of</strong> evaluating thisecologically significant zone: Evaluating Ground-Water/Surface-WaterTransition Zones in <strong>Ecological</strong> Risk Assessments (USEPA, July 2008).Diffusion bags have also been used for the collection <strong>of</strong> pore water fromsediments when the groundwater to surface water pathway is <strong>of</strong> concern. Thediffusion bags are deployed and are allowed to equilibrate over time. Thebags are then collected and the water within the bags is analyzed for the<strong>Ecological</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Guidance</strong> Document 59Version 1.2 8/29/12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!