13.07.2015 Views

Ecological Evaluation Technical Guidance - State of New Jersey

Ecological Evaluation Technical Guidance - State of New Jersey

Ecological Evaluation Technical Guidance - State of New Jersey

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Sample SelectionAfter completing the toxicity test phase <strong>of</strong> the bioaccumulation study,investigators should determine whether the tissue samples should besubmitted for COPEC analysis. When choosing test tissue samples to submitfor analysis, it is important to select only tissue from those soil or sedimentsamples that showed no significant reduction in organism survival, ascompared to the laboratory control or reference sample. If survival issignificantly reduced, bioaccumulation is not the primary concern. If asignificant percentage <strong>of</strong> the organisms exposed to a soil or sediment sampledid not survive the test period, it is highly likely that the tissue COPEC burdenaccumulated by the surviving organisms would not be representative andcould be misleading. It is also important to include only those test organismsthat survived the entire test period for tissue analysis. All dead organismsshould be recorded and discarded. Inclusion <strong>of</strong> dead organisms in tissueanalysis would not be representative and could bias the study.Tissue Mass RequirementsDepending on the list <strong>of</strong> COPECs, the analytical tissue mass requirement maybe quite high (50 to 70 grams per sample for a full suite <strong>of</strong> organic andinorganic analytes).Marine/estuarine bioaccumulation studies with oligochaete worms (e.g.,Nereis virens or Neanthes arenacoedentata) or bivalves (e.g., clams, musselsor oysters) can easily be designed to yield sufficient tissue mass because thetest organisms are relatively large. This allows analysis <strong>of</strong> tissue samplesfrom individual test replicates, allowing robust statistical comparison <strong>of</strong> eachsediment sample. However, freshwater bioaccumulation studies are typicallyperformed with much smaller polychaete worms (e.g., Lumbriculusvariegatus) or bivalves (e.g., fingernail clams, Corbicula fluminea).Individual L. variegatus weigh approximately 0.015 grams, requiringthousands <strong>of</strong> worms to make up a 50-gram tissue mass requirement. Becauseit is not feasible to set up multiple replicate samples with thousands <strong>of</strong> worms,it is best to limit use <strong>of</strong> L. variegatus to sediment samples with COPEC listswith a small analytical tissue mass requirement.Some bioaccumulation studies with soil organisms (e.g., earthworms orplants) can easily be designed to yield sufficient tissue mass because the testorganisms can be relatively large. Testing can be initiated with worm speciesthat are large enough to yield sufficient tissue at test termination. Plantbioaccumulation studies can be performed using species that will growsufficiently by test termination to yield the desired tissue mass. This allowsanalysis <strong>of</strong> tissue samples from individual test replicates, allowing robuststatistical comparison <strong>of</strong> each soil sample. The portion <strong>of</strong> plant to be assayedneeds to be determined on a case by case basis. For example, if data are to beused for dietary exposure modeling, Arrow arum fruit is a preferred food <strong>of</strong>wood ducks, and all portions <strong>of</strong> aquatic plants (e.g., roots, basal portions,stems, leaves) and basal portions <strong>of</strong> Phragmites can be consumed by<strong>Ecological</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Guidance</strong> Document 44Version 1.2 8/29/12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!