Ecological Evaluation Technical Guidance - State of New Jersey

More documents

Recommendations

Info

USEPA 1994c. Revision B, Method 1613B. Tetra- through Octa-Chlorinated Dioxins andFurans by Isotope Dilution HRGC/HRMS. EPA 821-B-94-005. Washington, DC.http://water.epa.gov/scitech/methods/cwa/organics/dioxins/index.cfmUSEPA. 1995a. Determination of Background Concentrations of Inorganics in Solidsand Sediments at Hazardous Waster Sites. EPA/540/S-96/500. R.P. Breckenridge andA.B. Crockett, National Engineering Forum Issue. Office of Research and Development,Washington, DC. http://www.epa.gov/swertio1/tsp/download/bckgrnd.pdfUSEPA. 1995b. Updates: Water Quality Criteria Documents for the Protection ofAquatic Life in Ambient Water (EPA-820-B-96-001)http://yosemite.epa.gov/water/owrccatalog.nsf/0/0b272603b228926785256d83004fd9ee?OpenDocumentUSEPA. 1995c. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP),Laboratory Methods Manual, Estuaries, Volume 1 – Biological and Chemical Analyses.EPA/620/R-95/008.http://www.epa.gov/emap/html/pubs/docs/groupdocs/estuary/field/lab_man.pdfUSEPA. 1996. Calculation and Evaluation of Sediment Effect Concentrations for theAmphipod Hyalella Azteca and the Midge Chironomus Riparius. EPA 905-R96-008.Great Lakes National Program Office, Washington, DC.USEPA. 1997a. Interim Final, Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund:Process for Designing and Conducting Ecological Risk Assessments. Office of SolidWaste and Emergency Response. EPA 540/R-97/006. Office of Solid Waste andEmergency Response, Washington DC.http://www.epa.gov/oswer/riskassessment/ecorisk/ecorisk.htmUSEPA. 1997b. Field and laboratory methods for macroinvertebrate and habitatassessment of low gradient nontidal streams. Mid-Atlantic Coastal Streams Workgroup,Environmental Services Division, Region 3, Wheeling, WV.http://www.epa.gov/bioindicators/pdf/MACS-FieldandLabMethods.pdfUSEPA. 1997c. Method 1629: Acid Volatile Sulfide and Simultaneously ExtractedMetals in Sediment. Office of Water, Washington DC.USEPA. 1998a. Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment. EPA/630/R-95/002F. RiskAssessment Forum, Washington DC. http://74.6.238.254/search/srpcache?ei=UTF-8&p=Guidelines+for+Ecological+Risk+Assessment%2C+Final&fr=yfp-t-701&u=http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=Guidelines+for+Ecological+Risk+Assessment%2c+Final&d=4795752060553092&mkt=en-US&setlang=en-US&w=f98058a0,523d1f96&icp=1&.intl=us&sig=janoBumwtF_Fq5l7nVNpgw--USEPA. 1998b. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program-Surface Waters:Field Operations and Methods for Measuring the Ecological Condition of WadeableStreams. EPA 620-R-94-004F.http://www.epa.gov/emap/html/pubs/docs/groupdocs/surfwatr/field/Sec05.PDFUSEPA. 1998c. Evaluation of Dredged Material Proposed for Discharge in Waters ofthe U.S. – Testing Manual. Inland Testing Manual. USEPA Office of Water and USArmy Corps of Engineers. EPA-823-B-98-004.Ecological Evaluation Technical Guidance Document 95Version 1.2 8/29/12
http://www.epa.gov/owow/oceans/regulatory/dumpdredged/pdf/itm_feb1998.pdfUSEPA. 1999a. Issuance of Final Guidance: Ecological Risk Assessment and RiskManagement Principals for Superfund Sites. USEPA, Washington DC. OSWERDirective 9285.7-28 P. http://www.epa.gov/oswer/riskassessment/pdf/final10-7.pdfUSEPA. 1999b. Barbour, M.T., Gerritsen, J., Snyder, B.D., and Stribling, J.B. 1999.Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton,Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, Second Edition. EPA 841-B-99-002. USEPA;Office of Water; Washington, DC.http://www.epa.gov/owow/monitoring/rbp/wp61pdf/rbp_main.pdfUSEPA. 1999c. Method 1668A/B Chlorinated Biphenyl Congeners in Water, Soil,Sediment, Biosolids, and Tissue by high-resolution gas chromatography/high resolutionmass spectrometry (HRGC/HRMS). EPA-821-R-08-020. Office of Water, Office ofScience and Technology. Washington, DC.http://water.epa.gov/scitech/methods/cwa/bioindicators/upload/2009_01_07_methods_method_1668.pdfUSEPA. 2000a. Methods for Measuring the Toxicity and Bioaccumulation of SedimentassociatedContaminants with Freshwater Invertebrates. Second Edition, March 2000.EPA 600/R-99/064. USEPA Office of Research and Development, Duluth, MN.http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/tmdl/records/region_5/2008/ref2759.pdfUSEPA. 2000b. Guidance for Assessing Chemical Contaminant Data for Use in FishAdvisories. EPA-823-B-00-007. USEPA, Office of Water, Washington, DC.http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/fishshellfish/techguidance/risk/upload/2009_04_23_fish_advice_volume1_v1cover.pdfUSEPA. 2000c. Bioaccumulation Testing and Interpretation for the Purpose of SedimentQuality Assessment, Status and Needs. EPA 823-R-00-001. USEPA, Office of Water,Washington, DC. http://water.epa.gov/polwaste/sediments/cs/upload/bioaccum.pdfUSEPA. 2001. Methods for Collection, Storage and Manipulation of Sediments forChemical and Toxicological Analyses: Technical Manual. USEPA Office of Water,Washington, DC. EPA-823-B-01-002.http://www.clu-in.org/download/contaminantfocus/sediments/methods-for-collectionepa-manual.pdfUSEPA. 2002a. Guidance for Comparing Background and Chemical Concentrations inSoil for CERCLA Sites. September 2002. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,Washington, DC. EPA-540R-01-003.http://www.epa.gov/oswer/riskassessment/pdf/background.pdfUSEPA. 2002b. Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents and ReceivingWaters to Freshwater and Marine Organisms. Fifth Edition, October 2002. USEPAOffice of Water, Washington, DC. EPA-821-R-02-012.http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/methods/wet/disk2/atx.pdfEcological Evaluation Technical Guidance Document 96Version 1.2 8/29/12
Page 1 and 2:
Ecological EvaluationTechnical Guid
Page 3 and 4:
6.2.1.3 Biological Sampling of Fish
Page 5 and 6:
Acronyms and AbbreviationsADDAETAFA
Page 7 and 8:
Executive SummaryThis document prov
Page 9 and 10:
environmentally sensitive areas pur
Page 11 and 12:
Figure 3-1: Flow diagram to describ
Page 13 and 14:
assessment may also include evaluat
Page 15 and 16:
“Hazard quotient” or “HQ” m
Page 17 and 18:
“Site investigation” means the
Page 19 and 20:
parameters as specified in ERAGS (i
Page 21 and 22:
document otherwise). The investigat
Page 23 and 24:
5.3.2.1 Potential Contaminant Migra
Page 25 and 26:
71 0Sampling pointsSampling transec
Page 27 and 28:
5.3.4 Background ConsiderationsIt i
Page 29 and 30:
III. GroundwaterAnalytical data fro
Page 31 and 32:
5.5 Ecological Evaluation ReportThe
Page 33 and 34:
Step 1 - Preliminary Screening Leve
Page 35 and 36:
specific measurements of receptor h
Page 37 and 38:
Figure 6-2: Ecological Conceptual S
Page 39 and 40:
ingested, air inhaled, or material
Page 41 and 42:
Fugacity, which is described as the
Page 43 and 44:
environment. As noted in ERAGS, the
Page 45 and 46: Sample SelectionAfter completing th
Page 47 and 48: While there are many laboratories t
Page 49 and 50: ioavailability, and by doing so, of
Page 51 and 52: For the purposes of surface water,
Page 53 and 54: higher trophic level receptors. Lip
Page 55 and 56: Details regarding surface water tox
Page 57 and 58: e present at intervals greater than
Page 59 and 60: elatively sedentary organisms that
Page 61 and 62: COPECs. The following references ar
Page 63 and 64: tests (USEPA, 2002e). After collect
Page 65 and 66: multiple reference area soils repre
Page 67 and 68: In ERAs, tissue residue analyses ar
Page 69 and 70: Objectives of the ERA: including a
Page 71 and 72: evaluation might necessitate the co
Page 73 and 74: N.J.A.C. 7:26E-4.8(c)1. The ERA may
Page 75 and 76: sediment (i.e., that fraction that
Page 77 and 78: Twelve dioxin-like PCB congeners ha
Page 79 and 80: indicates burial of potential dioxi
Page 81 and 82: of evidence for evaluating risk unt
Page 83 and 84: 7.2.1 Apparent Effects Threshold Ap
Page 85 and 86: when site conditions are most simil
Page 87 and 88: destroying 10 acres of the mature f
Page 89 and 90: ASTM (American Society for Testing
Page 91 and 92: Establishing Sediment Quality Crite
Page 93 and 94: N.J.A.C. (New Jersey Administrative
Page 95: USEPA. 1989c. Risk Assessment Guida
Page 99 and 100: USEPA 2006a. Data Quality Assessmen
Page 101 and 102: Appendix A - Habitat Survey FormsEc
Page 103 and 104: Ecological Evaluation Technical Gui
Page 105 and 106: Appendix B - Sampling Procedures fo
Page 107 and 108: Appendix C - Surface Water Toxicity
Page 109 and 110: Short-term chronic studies, endpoin
Page 111 and 112: Appendix D - Sediment Toxicity Test
Page 113 and 114: Toxicity Test DesignSediment toxici
Page 115 and 116: Appendix E - Sediment Pore Water an
Page 117 and 118: The seven-day daphnid survival and
Page 119 and 120: esults are then evaluated using USE
Page 121 and 122: Surber or Square-foot BottomThis sa
Page 123 and 124: Appendix H - Soil Toxicity TestingS
Page 125 and 126: another sample may still have a sub
Page 127 and 128: conservative approach from an ecolo
Page 129: Data PresentationTabular presentati
show all

Ecological Evaluation Technical Guidance - State of New Jersey

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?