Ecological Evaluation Technical Guidance - State of New Jersey

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC). 1995. Ecotoxicologyand Risk Assessment for Wetlands: Proceedings from the SETAC Pellston Workshop onEcotoxicology and Risk Assessment for Wetlands. eds. M.A. Lewis, F.L. Mayer, R.L.Powell, M.K. Nelson, S. J. Klaine, M.G. Henry, and G.W. Dickson. SETAC Press.Stahl, R.G., Bachman, R., Barton, A.L., Clark, J.R., deFur, P.L., Ells, S.J., Pittinger,C.A., Slimak, M.W., Wentsel, R.S. 2001. Risk Management: Ecological Risk-BasedDecision Making. Pensacola: SETAC Press. 1-192 pp.Suter, G.W., II. 1993. Ecological Risk Assessment. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.Suter, G.W., II, Efroymson, R.A., Sample, B.E., and Jones, D.S. 2000. Ecological RiskAssessment for Contaminated Sites. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.Tomasaewski, J., and Luthy, R.. 2008. Field Deployment of Polyethylene Devices toMeasure PCB Concentrations in Pore Water of Contaminated Sediment, EnvironmentalScience and Technology 42: 6086–91.USACE, New England District. 1995. The Highway Methodology WorkbookSupplement, Wetland Functions and Values, A Descriptive Approach. NEDEP-360-1-30a.USEPA. n.d. Measurement and Monitoring Technologies for the 21st Century: Samplingfor Contaminants in Sediments and Sediment Porewater. Technology InnovationProgram. http://clu-in.org/programs/21m2/sediment.USEPA. 1980. Dioxins. Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH.EPA 600/2-80-197.USEPA. 1985a. Sediment Sampling Quality Assurance User’s Guide. EPA/600-4-85-048. PB85-233542. Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory. Las Vegas, NV.USEPA. 1985b. Guidelines for Deriving Numerical National Water Quality Criteria forthe Protection of Aquatic Organisms and Their Uses. PB85-227049. Office of Researchand Development Environmental Research Laboratories. Duluth, MN, Narragansett, RI,and Corvallis, OR.http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/standards/criteria/aqlife/upload/85guidelines.pdfUSEPA. 1987. Interim Procedures for Estimating Risks Associated with Exposures toMixtures of Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and –Dibenzofurans (CDDs and CDFs).Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, DC. EPA/625/3-87/012.http://www.epa.gov/raf/publications/interim-procedures-cdds-cdfs.htmUSEPA. 1988. Review of Ecological Risk Assessment Methods. EPA/230-10-88-041.Office of Planning and Evaluation, Washington, DC.USEPA. 1989a. Evaluation of the Apparent Effects Threshold (AET) Approach forAssessing Sediment Quality. SAB-EETFC-89-027. Office of the Administrator, ScienceAdvisory Board Washington DC.USEPA. 1989b. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Volume 1, Human HealthEvaluation Manual – Part A.http://www.epa.gov/oswer/riskassessment/ragsa/pdf/rags-vol1-pta_complete.pdfEcological Evaluation Technical Guidance Document 93Version 1.2 8/29/12
USEPA. 1989c. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Volume II, EnvironmentalEvaluation Manual, Interim Final. EPA/540/1-89/001. USEPA, Office of Solid Wasteand Emergency Response, Washington, DC.USEPA. 1990a. Macroinvertebrate Field and Laboratory Methods for Evaluating theBiological Integrity of Surface Waters. EPA/600/4-90/030.http://www.epa.gov/bioiweb1/pdf/EPA-600-4-90-030MacroinvertebrateFieldandLaboratoryMethodsforEvalutingtheBiologicalIntegrityofSurfaceWaters.pdfUSEPA. 1990b. Biological Criteria: National Program for Surface Waters. EPA/440-5-90-004. Office of Water Regulations and Standards, Washington, DC.http://www.epa.gov/bioiweb1/html/biolcont.htmlUSEPA. 1990c. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program, EcologicalIndicators. EPA/600/3-90/060. USEPA, Office of Research and Development,Washington, DC.USEPA. 1991. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS) Part B, Calculation ofRisk-Based Preliminary Remediation Goals, Chapter 3.http://www.epa.gov/oswer/riskassessment/ragsb/USEPA. 1992a. Framework for Ecological Risk Assessment. EPA/630/R-92/001. RiskAssessment Forum., Washington DC.http://www.epa.gov/raf/publications/pdfs/FRMWRK_ERA.PDFUSEPA. 1992b. Evaluation of Terrestrial Indicators for Use in Ecological Assessmentsat Hazardous Waste Sites. EPA/600/R-92/183.USEPA. 1992c. Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment (Part A), PB92-963356. [online]. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, USEPA, Washington,DC. http://www.epa.gov/oswer/riskassessment/datause/parta.htmUSEPA. 1993a. Wildlife Exposure Factors Handbook. EPA/600/R-93/187a. Office ofResearch and Development, Washington, DC. http://www.epa.gov/ncea/pdfs/toc2-37.pdfUSEPA. 1993b. Interim Report on Data and Methods for Assessment of 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin Risks to Aquatic Life and Associated Wildlife. Office ofResearch and Development, Washington, DC. EPA/600/R-93/005.http://www.epa.gov/raf/publications/pdfs/DIOXIN_RISKS_AQUATIC_LIFE_AND_WILDLIFE_1993.PDFUSEPA. 1994a. Catalogue of Standard Toxicity Tests for Ecological Risk Assessment,ECO Update 2(2). Publication 9345.0-051. Washington, DC. Office of Solid Waste andEmergency Response. www.epa.gov/oswer/riskassessment/ecoup/pdf/v2no2.pdf.USEPA. 1994b. Method 8290: Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs) andpolychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) by high-resolution gas chromatography/highresolution mass spectrometry (HRGC/HRMS) in Test Methods for Evaluating SolidWaste, Physical/Chemical Methods, SW846," third edition, Final Update IV, January2008 (as amended and supplemented). Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,Washington, DC. http://www.epa.gov/SW-846Ecological Evaluation Technical Guidance Document 94Version 1.2 8/29/12
Page 1 and 2:
Ecological EvaluationTechnical Guid
Page 3 and 4:
6.2.1.3 Biological Sampling of Fish
Page 5 and 6:
Acronyms and AbbreviationsADDAETAFA
Page 7 and 8:
Executive SummaryThis document prov
Page 9 and 10:
environmentally sensitive areas pur
Page 11 and 12:
Figure 3-1: Flow diagram to describ
Page 13 and 14:
assessment may also include evaluat
Page 15 and 16:
“Hazard quotient” or “HQ” m
Page 17 and 18:
“Site investigation” means the
Page 19 and 20:
parameters as specified in ERAGS (i
Page 21 and 22:
document otherwise). The investigat
Page 23 and 24:
5.3.2.1 Potential Contaminant Migra
Page 25 and 26:
71 0Sampling pointsSampling transec
Page 27 and 28:
5.3.4 Background ConsiderationsIt i
Page 29 and 30:
III. GroundwaterAnalytical data fro
Page 31 and 32:
5.5 Ecological Evaluation ReportThe
Page 33 and 34:
Step 1 - Preliminary Screening Leve
Page 35 and 36:
specific measurements of receptor h
Page 37 and 38:
Figure 6-2: Ecological Conceptual S
Page 39 and 40:
ingested, air inhaled, or material
Page 41 and 42:
Fugacity, which is described as the
Page 43 and 44: environment. As noted in ERAGS, the
Page 45 and 46: Sample SelectionAfter completing th
Page 47 and 48: While there are many laboratories t
Page 49 and 50: ioavailability, and by doing so, of
Page 51 and 52: For the purposes of surface water,
Page 53 and 54: higher trophic level receptors. Lip
Page 55 and 56: Details regarding surface water tox
Page 57 and 58: e present at intervals greater than
Page 59 and 60: elatively sedentary organisms that
Page 61 and 62: COPECs. The following references ar
Page 63 and 64: tests (USEPA, 2002e). After collect
Page 65 and 66: multiple reference area soils repre
Page 67 and 68: In ERAs, tissue residue analyses ar
Page 69 and 70: Objectives of the ERA: including a
Page 71 and 72: evaluation might necessitate the co
Page 73 and 74: N.J.A.C. 7:26E-4.8(c)1. The ERA may
Page 75 and 76: sediment (i.e., that fraction that
Page 77 and 78: Twelve dioxin-like PCB congeners ha
Page 79 and 80: indicates burial of potential dioxi
Page 81 and 82: of evidence for evaluating risk unt
Page 83 and 84: 7.2.1 Apparent Effects Threshold Ap
Page 85 and 86: when site conditions are most simil
Page 87 and 88: destroying 10 acres of the mature f
Page 89 and 90: ASTM (American Society for Testing
Page 91 and 92: Establishing Sediment Quality Crite
Page 93: N.J.A.C. (New Jersey Administrative
Page 97 and 98: http://www.epa.gov/owow/oceans/regu
Page 99 and 100: USEPA 2006a. Data Quality Assessmen
Page 101 and 102: Appendix A - Habitat Survey FormsEc
Page 103 and 104: Ecological Evaluation Technical Gui
Page 105 and 106: Appendix B - Sampling Procedures fo
Page 107 and 108: Appendix C - Surface Water Toxicity
Page 109 and 110: Short-term chronic studies, endpoin
Page 111 and 112: Appendix D - Sediment Toxicity Test
Page 113 and 114: Toxicity Test DesignSediment toxici
Page 115 and 116: Appendix E - Sediment Pore Water an
Page 117 and 118: The seven-day daphnid survival and
Page 119 and 120: esults are then evaluated using USE
Page 121 and 122: Surber or Square-foot BottomThis sa
Page 123 and 124: Appendix H - Soil Toxicity TestingS
Page 125 and 126: another sample may still have a sub
Page 127 and 128: conservative approach from an ecolo
Page 129: Data PresentationTabular presentati
show all

Ecological Evaluation Technical Guidance - State of New Jersey

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?