13.07.2015 Views

Ecological Evaluation Technical Guidance - State of New Jersey

Ecological Evaluation Technical Guidance - State of New Jersey

Ecological Evaluation Technical Guidance - State of New Jersey

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

elatively sedentary organisms that inhabit or depend upon the sedimentenvironment for their various life functions. They are sensitive to both longtermand short-term changes in sediment and water quality and are frequentlyused as environmental indicators <strong>of</strong> biological integrity because they arefound in most aquatic habitats, are <strong>of</strong> a size permitting ease <strong>of</strong> collection, canbe used to describe water-quality conditions or health <strong>of</strong> ecosystemcomponents, and can identify causes <strong>of</strong> impaired conditions (USEPA, 1990a).Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys are advantageous in that they integrate theinteractions <strong>of</strong> multiple contaminants and multiple routes <strong>of</strong> exposure, and canrespond to a broad array <strong>of</strong> potential pollutants. Some limitations are that theydo not identify the contaminant responsible for the observed toxicity,population impacts are not readily translated into contaminant remediationgoals, and results are <strong>of</strong>ten confounded by variables not related to contaminanttoxicity (predation, seasonal differences, physicochemical sedimentcharacteristics, food availability).The utility <strong>of</strong> benthic macroinvertebrate surveys may diminish whenconducted in urban streams and rivers that are known to contain diffuseanthropogenic pollutants and/or multiple industrial point discharges. Underthese conditions, survey results <strong>of</strong>ten indicate the presence <strong>of</strong> pollutiontolerant organisms with little to no difference in diversity when compared tothe results from a reference area location, and <strong>of</strong>fer limited useful informationregarding impacts that can be attributed directly to the site under investigation.Under these circumstances, the investigator may decide to rely more heavilyon other lines <strong>of</strong> evidence such as sediment toxicity tests and receptor tissueconcentrations.A full description <strong>of</strong> how to conduct a benthic macroinvertebrate survey isbeyond the scope <strong>of</strong> this document; however, some <strong>of</strong> the more commonlyused references are provided in Section 11.0 (USEPA, 1999b; USEPA, 1990a;USEPA, 1998b; and Long and Chapman, 1985).6.2.2.3 Sediment Pore Water SamplingBulk sediment chemistry data are derived from measuring only the solid phase<strong>of</strong> a sediment sample via standard analytical methods. Typically, bulksediment chemistry data are compared to conservatively based screeningcriteria to evaluate potential risk to benthic infauna. This type <strong>of</strong> comparisonis generally conducted during the screening phase <strong>of</strong> an investigation and it isacknowledged that site-specific bioavailability is not being measured at thisstage.In addition to direct exposure to contaminants associated with the sedimentsolid phase (e.g. mineral or organic phases), benthic organisms are exposed tothe sediment pore water, which is the water located in the interstitial spacebetween the sediment solid-phase particles. It is widely recognized thatcontaminant pore water concentrations more accurately predict toxicity andobserved community level effects than do whole sediment concentrations fornonionic compounds (Di Toro et al., 1991, 2005a; Di Toro, 2008; Hansen et<strong>Ecological</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Guidance</strong> Document 58Version 1.2 8/29/12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!