PAH homologs listed in the equilibrium benchmark guidance (USEPA, 2003).Pore water concentrations generated from this method are then evaluated usingUSEPA’s hydrocarbon narcosis model (USEPA, 2003). The Tier 2 SPMEanalysis is especially useful when evaluating PAH-contaminated sediments inindustrialized and urban settings where the presence <strong>of</strong> black soot (soot carbon),which is known to influence PAH bioavailability, is potentially present. Thismethod was demonstrated by Hawthorne, et al. (2007) to be significantly betterthan conventional sediment chemistry tests, as well as EqP, for predicting impactto survival as determined by sediment toxicity tests using a sensitive sedimentdwellingspecies (Hyalella azteca). If Tier 2 results indicate the potential for risk,then the assessment may proceed to Tier 3 in which sediment toxicity testing isconducted in the ERA stage <strong>of</strong> the investigation (6.2.2.5).While the USEPA tiered approach discussed above is in the form <strong>of</strong> a “whitepaper,” it represents a logical, step-wise approach that the investigator may usewhen assessing ecological risk to benthic invertebrates from PAH-contaminatedsediments.As noted above, PAHs are present as diffuse anthropogenic pollutants in manywater bodies and concentrations in the low part per million (ppm) range can beexpected in urban watersheds. As such, it is imperative that background areasamples be collected when evaluating PAHs to establish an accurate range <strong>of</strong>PAH background contaminant levels (Section 5.3.4). This information will aid indetermining if the PAHs are related to a site discharge, and may potentiallyinfluence the development <strong>of</strong> an RMD.6.4.7 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (Aroclor vs. Congener)Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) are two-ringed structures with a variety <strong>of</strong>chlorination, produced originally under the trade name “Aroclor.” Aroclors aremixtures <strong>of</strong> 209 possible congeners and were produced with a range <strong>of</strong>chlorination (e.g. Aroclor 1016 was 16% chlorine by weight, whereas Aroclor1260 was 60% chlorine by weight). PCBs may also be divided into 10 homologclasses ranging from monochlorobiphenyl to decachlorobiphenyl. Depending onthe application, a variety <strong>of</strong> Aroclor mixtures (typical mixtures were Aroclor1016, 1242, 1248, 1254, and 1260) were used and their chemical signatures arestill found within environmental media (Ashley et al., 2003 and Imamoglu andChristensen, 2002). Because <strong>of</strong> physical, chemical, and biological processes, thelower molecular weight (and less chlorinated) PCBs within the mixture are lessfrequently found compared to relatively more stable (refractory) higher molecularweight congeners (Ashley et al., 2003 and Bernhard, et al., 2001). For example,depending on when the mixture was released into the environment, some <strong>of</strong> the209 PCB congeners present in an original Aroclor mixture may have degradedand it is not uncommon for the mono, di, and tri-substituted PCBs to be lessprevalent in environmental and biological media than the more chlorinatedcongeners (Ashley et al., 2003). The weathering <strong>of</strong> the original Aroclor mixturesand congeners presents some challenges to ecological risk assessors attempting todetermine how best to assess potential risks posed by exposure to these chemicals(de Solla, et al., 2010).<strong>Ecological</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Guidance</strong> Document 75Version 1.2 8/29/12
Twelve dioxin-like PCB congeners have been identified by the World HealthOrganization (WHO) and assigned Toxic Equivalency Factors (TEF) becausethey produce biological effects similar to 2,3,7,8-TCDD with varying potenciesand generally act together in an additive fashion. The term “2,3,7,8-TCDD”refers to the single compound, 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro dibenzo-p-dioxin, the mosttoxic form <strong>of</strong> this class <strong>of</strong> compounds. Refer to Section 6.4.7 for management <strong>of</strong>PCB congener data via the Toxic Equivalency (TEQ) approach.It is important for the field sampling and analysis plan to specify whetherenvironmental media and biota will be analyzed for individual PCB Aroclors,homolog groups, 209 PCB congeners, or the 12 dioxin-like PCB congeners. Inmost cases, sampling conducted for the EE during the SI should be focused onindividual PCB Aroclor analysis. Unless there is clear indication that morerigorous analyses are required, such as for a site known to have elevated PCBs inESNRs, this approach is reasonable because analyzing samples for Aroclors isless time-consuming and less costly than conducting analyses for the homologs orthe congeners (Bernhard and Petron, 2001). For screening purposes, individualPCB Aroclors may be an appropriate level <strong>of</strong> analysis, particularly where thereare time and financial constraints, and where the size <strong>of</strong> the potentially impactedarea is relatively small. During the remedial investigation, where the ERA,potential remedy, or source attribution depends on the speciation <strong>of</strong> the PCBspresent in the samples, it may be necessary to consider the more detailed PCBcongener or homolog analysis. It may be appropriate to conduct PCB congener orhomolog analyses on a subset or percentage <strong>of</strong> the total samples rather than on allsamples.6.4.8 Chlorinated Dioxin, Furans, and Dioxin-like PolychlorinatedBiphenylsThis section is intended to provide guidance on when a dioxin-like(polychlorinated- dioxin, furan, or biphenyl) investigation is warranted and howto perform the investigation, evaluate the data in the EE and ERA, and presentresults.Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDD), polychlorinated dibenz<strong>of</strong>uran(PCDF), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are persistent biomagnifyingcontaminants typically found in the environment as a mixture <strong>of</strong> congeners, all <strong>of</strong>which present similar chemical structures. There are 75 possible PCDDcongeners, 135 possible PCDF congeners, and 209 possible PCB congeners. Thecongener pattern in a mixture will vary depending on the source material oroperation that generated these compounds and their toxicity depends on thenumber and location <strong>of</strong> chlorine atoms.This guidance document focuses on the internationally recognized subset <strong>of</strong> themost toxic congeners (i.e., the 7 PCDD, 10 PCDF, and 12 PCB compounds) thatcontain laterally-substituted chlorine in the 2, 3, 7, and 8 positions for the PCDDsand PCDFs and laterally-substituted chlorines in the 3,4,5/3’,4’,5’ positions forthe PCBs. To simplify the assessment <strong>of</strong> the toxicity <strong>of</strong> these complex mixtures,the USEPA adopted a WHO procedure based on the relative toxicities <strong>of</strong> the 29<strong>Ecological</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Guidance</strong> Document 76Version 1.2 8/29/12
- Page 1 and 2:
Ecological EvaluationTechnical Guid
- Page 3 and 4:
6.2.1.3 Biological Sampling of Fish
- Page 5 and 6:
Acronyms and AbbreviationsADDAETAFA
- Page 7 and 8:
Executive SummaryThis document prov
- Page 9 and 10:
environmentally sensitive areas pur
- Page 11 and 12:
Figure 3-1: Flow diagram to describ
- Page 13 and 14:
assessment may also include evaluat
- Page 15 and 16:
“Hazard quotient” or “HQ” m
- Page 17 and 18:
“Site investigation” means the
- Page 19 and 20:
parameters as specified in ERAGS (i
- Page 21 and 22:
document otherwise). The investigat
- Page 23 and 24:
5.3.2.1 Potential Contaminant Migra
- Page 25 and 26: 71 0Sampling pointsSampling transec
- Page 27 and 28: 5.3.4 Background ConsiderationsIt i
- Page 29 and 30: III. GroundwaterAnalytical data fro
- Page 31 and 32: 5.5 Ecological Evaluation ReportThe
- Page 33 and 34: Step 1 - Preliminary Screening Leve
- Page 35 and 36: specific measurements of receptor h
- Page 37 and 38: Figure 6-2: Ecological Conceptual S
- Page 39 and 40: ingested, air inhaled, or material
- Page 41 and 42: Fugacity, which is described as the
- Page 43 and 44: environment. As noted in ERAGS, the
- Page 45 and 46: Sample SelectionAfter completing th
- Page 47 and 48: While there are many laboratories t
- Page 49 and 50: ioavailability, and by doing so, of
- Page 51 and 52: For the purposes of surface water,
- Page 53 and 54: higher trophic level receptors. Lip
- Page 55 and 56: Details regarding surface water tox
- Page 57 and 58: e present at intervals greater than
- Page 59 and 60: elatively sedentary organisms that
- Page 61 and 62: COPECs. The following references ar
- Page 63 and 64: tests (USEPA, 2002e). After collect
- Page 65 and 66: multiple reference area soils repre
- Page 67 and 68: In ERAs, tissue residue analyses ar
- Page 69 and 70: Objectives of the ERA: including a
- Page 71 and 72: evaluation might necessitate the co
- Page 73 and 74: N.J.A.C. 7:26E-4.8(c)1. The ERA may
- Page 75: sediment (i.e., that fraction that
- Page 79 and 80: indicates burial of potential dioxi
- Page 81 and 82: of evidence for evaluating risk unt
- Page 83 and 84: 7.2.1 Apparent Effects Threshold Ap
- Page 85 and 86: when site conditions are most simil
- Page 87 and 88: destroying 10 acres of the mature f
- Page 89 and 90: ASTM (American Society for Testing
- Page 91 and 92: Establishing Sediment Quality Crite
- Page 93 and 94: N.J.A.C. (New Jersey Administrative
- Page 95 and 96: USEPA. 1989c. Risk Assessment Guida
- Page 97 and 98: http://www.epa.gov/owow/oceans/regu
- Page 99 and 100: USEPA 2006a. Data Quality Assessmen
- Page 101 and 102: Appendix A - Habitat Survey FormsEc
- Page 103 and 104: Ecological Evaluation Technical Gui
- Page 105 and 106: Appendix B - Sampling Procedures fo
- Page 107 and 108: Appendix C - Surface Water Toxicity
- Page 109 and 110: Short-term chronic studies, endpoin
- Page 111 and 112: Appendix D - Sediment Toxicity Test
- Page 113 and 114: Toxicity Test DesignSediment toxici
- Page 115 and 116: Appendix E - Sediment Pore Water an
- Page 117 and 118: The seven-day daphnid survival and
- Page 119 and 120: esults are then evaluated using USE
- Page 121 and 122: Surber or Square-foot BottomThis sa
- Page 123 and 124: Appendix H - Soil Toxicity TestingS
- Page 125 and 126: another sample may still have a sub
- Page 127 and 128:
conservative approach from an ecolo
- Page 129:
Data PresentationTabular presentati