point in time. Community function is the measurement <strong>of</strong> rate processes (e.g.species colonization rates) <strong>of</strong> the ecosystem. Although both surveys canprovide value depending on the biological questions being asked in the riskassessment, most <strong>of</strong>ten, structural surveys are conducted because they aregenerally less resource-intensive in terms <strong>of</strong> time and cost.In surface water environments, a variety <strong>of</strong> community surveys can beconducted and these data can be used in various ways. Most commonlyaccepted and <strong>of</strong>ten the easiest to conduct and evaluate are statistically basedindices that have been developed by numerous states for a range <strong>of</strong> ecosystemcomponents. However, other surveys may be applicable based on seasonalvariation, natural characteristics <strong>of</strong> the site, or other project demands.What is important is that the parameters <strong>of</strong> the survey accurately reflect thedata acquisition needs <strong>of</strong> the ERA, including the community selected,sampling methods, and spatial and temporal planning. Surveys that use morethan one taxonomic group and more than one trophic and tolerance level ineach group tend to be more robust. Additionally, sampling protocols thataccount for subhabitats and seasonal life-cycle changes will yield a morerepresentative data set.Generally accepted aquatic community surveys include fish,macroinvertebrates, algae, and zooplankton. Fish and macroinvertebrates aretypically used in lotic environments, plants are generally used in wetlandenvironments, and algae are <strong>of</strong>ten used in lentic environments. Samplingmethods for these groups are discussed in Sections 6.2.1.3, 6.2.2.4, and 6.4.1.6.2.1.3 Biological Sampling <strong>of</strong> Fish and Other Aquatic OrganismsAs part <strong>of</strong> the completion <strong>of</strong> an ERA, the investigator may choose to collectaquatic biota for either fish tissue analysis or community survey purposes.When fish are collected for chemical analysis <strong>of</strong> tissue, whole body analysis isrequired to evaluate the representative dose to predator species. Species basedon feeding guilds and habitats present in the ESNR should be targeted forcollection. For example, it may be appropriate to target water column feeders(e.g. white perch), bottom dwellers (e.g. brown bullhead, channel catfish,white catfish, eel), and large forage range fish (largemouth bass, smallmouthbass, striped bass, rock bass). The analysis <strong>of</strong> individual fish is paramount,with compositing recommended only when necessary to achieve the minimumtissue mass for chemical analysis. If compositing is used, it is recommendedthat only fish from one habitat or feeding area be combined. Cross-speciescompositing should not be performed.Pr<strong>of</strong>essional judgment may be needed to decide whether to composite for fullscan analysis versus analysis <strong>of</strong> individual fish in accordance with a sitespecificanalytical hierarchy. For composite samples, it is recommended thatthe length <strong>of</strong> the smallest fish in a sample should be > 75% <strong>of</strong> the largest; thesex, weight, and length <strong>of</strong> each fish used for each sample should be recorded.Fish tissue data should be reported on a wet-weight basis becauserepresentative contaminant concentrations are needed for dietary modeling to<strong>Ecological</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Guidance</strong> Document 51Version 1.2 8/29/12
higher trophic level receptors. Lipids and percent moisture should beanalyzed in each sample.Generally, when fish are selected for community survey purposes, the goal isto collect all species in a defined area. Two common fish collection methodsfor biological survey purposes are seining, which has a limited efficacydepending on habitat, and electr<strong>of</strong>ishing, which, when used appropriately,greatly increases the number <strong>of</strong> available individuals captured. Often a seine isset on the downstream end <strong>of</strong> the selected survey reach to ensure capture <strong>of</strong> allstunned individuals including those not captured by the personnel at theelectr<strong>of</strong>ishing location itself. In most cases, a pulsed DC current is usedbecause this keeps mortality low. An AC current may be needed in streamswith low conductivity. Other methods, such as gill nets and minnow traps,can be used.The type <strong>of</strong> electr<strong>of</strong>ishing gear used (e.g., backpack, boat, barge) is dependenton the stream characteristics. The selection <strong>of</strong> the reach used should bereflective <strong>of</strong> the data needs for the risk assessment and should include allmajor subhabitats characteristic <strong>of</strong> the area. Sampling should be conducted inJune through early October during normal flow conditions. Sampling duringthe winter, at night, and during atypical flow conditions will not produce arepresentative data set.Electr<strong>of</strong>ishing should only be performed by trained personnel. Proper permitsmust be obtained (http://www.nj.gov/dep/fgw/scicolperm.htm). Detailedprocedures are given in the Rapid Assessment Protocols for use in WadeableStreams and Rivers (USEPA, 1999b) including QA/QC and important safetyprecautions.The method used most <strong>of</strong>ten to collect individual fish is to work slowlyupstream capturing all stunned fish as they drift. These fish are then placed inlive wells (situated outside <strong>of</strong> the current impact area) to reduce mortality.Once the fish in the selected reach have been collected, the specimens areidentified in the field to species level, and all data are recorded on data sheets.Fish less than 20 mm long are not included in tallies because <strong>of</strong> theirseasonality and limited response to the sampling method. Other data may becollected depending on the specific study design. Identification should bemade by an experienced biologist or ecologist familiar with <strong>New</strong> <strong>Jersey</strong>fishes. Once all organisms have been identified, the fish are released back intothe stream. Voucher specimens may be collected as the needs <strong>of</strong> the projectdictate.Physicochemical and habitat data should be conducted on the same day as thesurvey is conducted. If the data collection requires disturbing targeted habitat,it should be conducted either after the survey is complete or just outside thesurvey area.During collection <strong>of</strong> fish, sampling personnel should record observations suchas species identification, number <strong>of</strong> species, sex, age, length, weight, disease,and presence <strong>of</strong> gross histopathological anomalies that may be present in such<strong>Ecological</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Guidance</strong> Document 52Version 1.2 8/29/12
- Page 1 and 2: Ecological EvaluationTechnical Guid
- Page 3 and 4: 6.2.1.3 Biological Sampling of Fish
- Page 5 and 6: Acronyms and AbbreviationsADDAETAFA
- Page 7 and 8: Executive SummaryThis document prov
- Page 9 and 10: environmentally sensitive areas pur
- Page 11 and 12: Figure 3-1: Flow diagram to describ
- Page 13 and 14: assessment may also include evaluat
- Page 15 and 16: “Hazard quotient” or “HQ” m
- Page 17 and 18: “Site investigation” means the
- Page 19 and 20: parameters as specified in ERAGS (i
- Page 21 and 22: document otherwise). The investigat
- Page 23 and 24: 5.3.2.1 Potential Contaminant Migra
- Page 25 and 26: 71 0Sampling pointsSampling transec
- Page 27 and 28: 5.3.4 Background ConsiderationsIt i
- Page 29 and 30: III. GroundwaterAnalytical data fro
- Page 31 and 32: 5.5 Ecological Evaluation ReportThe
- Page 33 and 34: Step 1 - Preliminary Screening Leve
- Page 35 and 36: specific measurements of receptor h
- Page 37 and 38: Figure 6-2: Ecological Conceptual S
- Page 39 and 40: ingested, air inhaled, or material
- Page 41 and 42: Fugacity, which is described as the
- Page 43 and 44: environment. As noted in ERAGS, the
- Page 45 and 46: Sample SelectionAfter completing th
- Page 47 and 48: While there are many laboratories t
- Page 49 and 50: ioavailability, and by doing so, of
- Page 51: For the purposes of surface water,
- Page 55 and 56: Details regarding surface water tox
- Page 57 and 58: e present at intervals greater than
- Page 59 and 60: elatively sedentary organisms that
- Page 61 and 62: COPECs. The following references ar
- Page 63 and 64: tests (USEPA, 2002e). After collect
- Page 65 and 66: multiple reference area soils repre
- Page 67 and 68: In ERAs, tissue residue analyses ar
- Page 69 and 70: Objectives of the ERA: including a
- Page 71 and 72: evaluation might necessitate the co
- Page 73 and 74: N.J.A.C. 7:26E-4.8(c)1. The ERA may
- Page 75 and 76: sediment (i.e., that fraction that
- Page 77 and 78: Twelve dioxin-like PCB congeners ha
- Page 79 and 80: indicates burial of potential dioxi
- Page 81 and 82: of evidence for evaluating risk unt
- Page 83 and 84: 7.2.1 Apparent Effects Threshold Ap
- Page 85 and 86: when site conditions are most simil
- Page 87 and 88: destroying 10 acres of the mature f
- Page 89 and 90: ASTM (American Society for Testing
- Page 91 and 92: Establishing Sediment Quality Crite
- Page 93 and 94: N.J.A.C. (New Jersey Administrative
- Page 95 and 96: USEPA. 1989c. Risk Assessment Guida
- Page 97 and 98: http://www.epa.gov/owow/oceans/regu
- Page 99 and 100: USEPA 2006a. Data Quality Assessmen
- Page 101 and 102: Appendix A - Habitat Survey FormsEc
- Page 103 and 104:
Ecological Evaluation Technical Gui
- Page 105 and 106:
Appendix B - Sampling Procedures fo
- Page 107 and 108:
Appendix C - Surface Water Toxicity
- Page 109 and 110:
Short-term chronic studies, endpoin
- Page 111 and 112:
Appendix D - Sediment Toxicity Test
- Page 113 and 114:
Toxicity Test DesignSediment toxici
- Page 115 and 116:
Appendix E - Sediment Pore Water an
- Page 117 and 118:
The seven-day daphnid survival and
- Page 119 and 120:
esults are then evaluated using USE
- Page 121 and 122:
Surber or Square-foot BottomThis sa
- Page 123 and 124:
Appendix H - Soil Toxicity TestingS
- Page 125 and 126:
another sample may still have a sub
- Page 127 and 128:
conservative approach from an ecolo
- Page 129:
Data PresentationTabular presentati