13.07.2015 Views

Review of Environmental Factors - Transport for NSW - NSW ...

Review of Environmental Factors - Transport for NSW - NSW ...

Review of Environmental Factors - Transport for NSW - NSW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The skip bin and site compound area will be within the rail corridor near the site. The construction process willrequire a team <strong>of</strong> three to six people on site per day.3.3 Timing and CostingConstruction is planned to begin in first half <strong>of</strong> 2012 and scheduled to run <strong>for</strong> a period <strong>of</strong> six weeks.Proposed construction timing:Standard working hoursEvening/Weekends/Out <strong>of</strong> hours:Monday to Friday 7.00am to 6.00pmSaturday 8:00am to 1:00pmNo night works or out <strong>of</strong> hours works proposedNo work on Sundays/public holidaysThe DTRS project has an overarching value <strong>of</strong> $225 million. This includes the design, supply, and installation <strong>of</strong>the DTRS on the RailCorp electrified network plus a five-year life support component.3.4 Alternatives to the DTRSAs discussed earlier, the Waterfall Special Commission <strong>of</strong> Inquiry precipitated the recommendations regardingcommunications in <strong>NSW</strong> rail operations and within RailCorp. The <strong>NSW</strong> Government then committed to a statewidestrategy <strong>for</strong> all rail communications.RailCorp investigated a number <strong>of</strong> alternatives already used by the state government or available commercially,looking <strong>for</strong> a system that met its own safety and reliability requirements as well as the recommendations <strong>of</strong> theWaterfall inquiry.The government alternatives were the existing MetroNet system or the Government Radio Network (GRN).The existing MetroNet communication system was not deemed a feasible solution <strong>for</strong> the reasons listed below.• It uses outdated technology and cannot be expanded due to its limited capacity.• It does not have the ability to support the requirements <strong>of</strong> Automatic Train Protection.• It only has one main supplier and this, combined with obsolete technology, means the cost <strong>of</strong> using andmaintaining the MetroNet system is increasing at a substantial rate.• It cannot facilitate a communications plat<strong>for</strong>m that can be used by all necessary RailCorp personnel.• It could not meet interoperability requirements.The Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce’s Government Radio Network (GRN) was not deemed a feasible solution <strong>for</strong> thereasons listed below.• It has to be shared with other <strong>NSW</strong> Government agencies.• Priority is given to emergency services which could result in a failure <strong>of</strong> 100% rail network coverage.• The network is both inside and outside the rail corridor.Page 25 <strong>of</strong> 67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!