13.07.2015 Views

Review of Environmental Factors - Transport for NSW - NSW ...

Review of Environmental Factors - Transport for NSW - NSW ...

Review of Environmental Factors - Transport for NSW - NSW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Principallocated, as far as practical, underground orwithin an existing underground conduit orduct.(b) Overhead lines, antennas and ancillarytelecommunications facilities should, wherepractical, be co-located or attached to existingstructures such as buildings, public utilitystructures, poles, towers or other radiocommunications equipment to minimise theproliferation <strong>of</strong> telecommunication facilitiesand unnecessary clutter.(c) Towers may be extended <strong>for</strong> the purposes<strong>of</strong> co-location.(d) The extension <strong>of</strong> an existing tower mustbe considered as a practical co-locationsolution prior to building new towers.(e) If a facility is proposed not to be colocatedthe proponent must demonstrate thatco-location is not practicable.(f) If the development is <strong>for</strong> a co-locationpurpose, then any new telecommunicationsfacility must be designed, installed andoperated so that the resultant cumulativelevels <strong>of</strong> radio frequency emissions <strong>of</strong> the colocatedtelecommunications facilities arewithin the maximum human exposure levelsset out in the Radiation Protection Standard.Proposalwill be in existing conduits or in newunderground conduits wherever feasible orpossible.Co-location on other communications towershas been considered. No other towers weredeemed appropriate or in a location toprovide sufficient network coverage, as sucha new monopole is proposed.The proposal does not involve the use <strong>of</strong> anexisting tower. The extension <strong>of</strong> existingtowers in the area was considered anddeemed unsuitable.The proposal does not involve the use <strong>of</strong> anexisting tower, however the extension <strong>of</strong>existing towers in the area was consideredand deemed unsuitable.There are no suitable communicationstowers in the target coverage area that wouldsatisfy the coverage objectives as well as thenetwork requirements <strong>of</strong> the DTRS project.Co-location is not proposed.Principle 3: Health standards <strong>for</strong> exposure to radio emissions will be met.Page 60 <strong>of</strong> 67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!