13.07.2015 Views

Stanley-Eric-Captive-Genders-Trans-Embodiment-and-Prison-Industrial-Complex

Stanley-Eric-Captive-Genders-Trans-Embodiment-and-Prison-Industrial-Complex

Stanley-Eric-Captive-Genders-Trans-Embodiment-and-Prison-Industrial-Complex

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Only Freedom I Can SeeMiddle-class gay white men argued that “gay rights” should remain a legislativeissue <strong>and</strong> that “legally sanctioned gay marriage should be a primaryconcern for all of us.” 37 Kunzel charts the ways that the forced forgettingof queer <strong>and</strong> trans prisoners was central to the coalescing of “new gaynorms,” “gay respectability,” <strong>and</strong> homonormativity. This disciplining ofthe queer left was a racialized project that coalesced around shoring up theprivileges afforded by whiteness, gender normativity, <strong>and</strong> capital. It wasa movement to proliferate the life-enhancing norms of white supremacy<strong>and</strong> neoliberalism at the expense of so many lives, in addition to a movement<strong>and</strong> politics bent on the liberation of all.The purging of imprisoned queer <strong>and</strong> trans people from “the community”has, in part, acted as the condition of possibility for the privileges<strong>and</strong> power afforded to those not ensnared in the nexus of power producedby neoliberalism, heteropatriarchy, white supremacy, <strong>and</strong> regimesof incarceration. The forgotten, the expunged, <strong>and</strong> the eradicated are intimatelyconstitutive of what we remember, how we know, <strong>and</strong> where weare. As some seek safety <strong>and</strong> security under racially gendered state <strong>and</strong>corporate power, what quotidian deaths will make such shelter possible?What norms will proliferate? What bodies <strong>and</strong> lives will be constructedas disposable or even unimaginable by a movement for inclusion? Whosedoors will continue to be kicked down? Who will continue to be taken atnight, or under the light of day?Imagining the ImpossibleIn his description of the differences between death row <strong>and</strong> administrativesegregation (the hole), C captures the possibilities that lie within the immobilizingcontradictions of states of captivity:Did I feel differently being on death row? Honestly, to me the onlydifference between death row <strong>and</strong> Ad.-Seg. [is] that in Ad.-Seg oneday when you do all your sentence you will go home <strong>and</strong> in death rowyou don’t go home, you get killed…but in death row at least you havea small window in your cell <strong>and</strong> here in Ad.-Seg [there is] not even awindow to at least see [the] outside, the blue sky, or the night stars. 38In her poetry, R articulates a similar theorization of possibilitywithin the immobilization <strong>and</strong> incomprehensibility of captivity whenshe writes, “The only freedom I can see/Is death in a prison cell.” 39 Thiscontradictory logic—that freedom comes with death inside one’s cell (<strong>and</strong>181

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!