13.07.2015 Views

Stanley-Eric-Captive-Genders-Trans-Embodiment-and-Prison-Industrial-Complex

Stanley-Eric-Captive-Genders-Trans-Embodiment-and-Prison-Industrial-Complex

Stanley-Eric-Captive-Genders-Trans-Embodiment-and-Prison-Industrial-Complex

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Building an Abolitionist <strong>Trans</strong> <strong>and</strong> Queer Movement• Undermining <strong>Trans</strong>formative OrganizingThe second half of the twentieth century saw a major upsurge in radical<strong>and</strong> revolutionary organizing in oppressed communities in the UnitedStates <strong>and</strong> around the world. This powerful organizing posed a significantthreat to the legitimacy of US power <strong>and</strong> capitalist empire morebroadly, <strong>and</strong> therefore needed to be contained. These movements wereundermined by two main strategies: First, the radical movements of the1960s <strong>and</strong> ’70s were criminalized, with the US government using tacticsof imprisonment, torture, sabotage, <strong>and</strong> assassination to target <strong>and</strong> destroygroups like the Black Panthers, American Indian Movement, <strong>and</strong>Young Lords, among others. Second, the growth of the nonprofit sectorhas seen social movements professionalizing, chasing philanthropic dollars,separating into “issue areas,” <strong>and</strong> moving toward social services <strong>and</strong>legal reform projects rather than radical projects aimed at the underlyingcauses of poverty <strong>and</strong> injustice. 17 These developments left significant sectionsof the radical left traumatized <strong>and</strong> decimated, wiping out a generationof revolutionaries <strong>and</strong> shifting the terms of resistance from revolution<strong>and</strong> transformation to inclusion <strong>and</strong> reform, prioritizing state- <strong>and</strong> foundation-sanctionedlegal reforms <strong>and</strong> social services over mass organizing<strong>and</strong> direct action.EXAMPLE: The FBI’s Counter-Intelligence Program (COINTEL-PRO) is a notorious example of the US government’s use of infiltration,surveillance, <strong>and</strong> violence to overtly target dissent <strong>and</strong> resistance.COINTELPRO was exposed when internal government documentswere revealed that detailed the outrageous work undertaken by thefederal government to dismantle resistance groups in the 1960s <strong>and</strong>’70s. Although the program was dissolved under that name, the tacticscontinued <strong>and</strong> can be seen today in current controversies about wiretapping<strong>and</strong> torture as well as in the USA PATRIOT Act. Overt actionto eliminate resistance <strong>and</strong> dissent here is as old as the Europeancolonization of North America. 18EXAMPLE: In the wake of decades of radical organizing by people inwomen’s prisons <strong>and</strong> activists on the outside decrying systemic medicalneglect, sexual violence, <strong>and</strong> the destruction of family bonds, Californialegislators in 2006 proposed a so-called “gender responsive corrections”bill that would allow people in women’s prisons to live withtheir children <strong>and</strong> receive increased social services. To make this plan25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!