13.07.2015 Views

Stanley-Eric-Captive-Genders-Trans-Embodiment-and-Prison-Industrial-Complex

Stanley-Eric-Captive-Genders-Trans-Embodiment-and-Prison-Industrial-Complex

Stanley-Eric-Captive-Genders-Trans-Embodiment-and-Prison-Industrial-Complex

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Captive</strong> <strong>Genders</strong>NOTES1. In mid-1960s San Francisco, both male-presenting gay men <strong>and</strong> male-bodiedpeople presenting as female referred to themselves as “gay.” While male-bodiedpeople who presented as female might also refer to themselves <strong>and</strong> be referred toby others in their community as drag queens, hair fairies, transsexuals, cross-dressers,or transvestites, the term “gay” served as a catch-all for people who might nowidentify as gay men, drag-queens, transsexual women, or transgendered women.Because transwomen self-identified with the term gay as frequently as did masculinehomosexual men, many of the sources I quote or paraphrase from this period,as well as oral histories recorded later but reflecting upon this period, use the terms“gay” or “drag queen” to refer to male-bodied or transitioning people who livedfull time as women (even though these people might today identify as transgenderor transsexual). While this may be confusing or seem to elide or erase transgenderexperiences, it marks the identity categories that were available at the time. Nevertheless,when discussing female-presenting members of Vanguard from my ownvantage point, I use the words transgender <strong>and</strong> transsexual for clarity’s sake, <strong>and</strong>as a way of acknowledging the contributions of transgender women to this group<strong>and</strong> claiming their accomplishments as part of transgender history.2. For much of the information that follows, I am deeply indebted to Susan Stryker,who generously provided me with the transcript of an oral history she recordedwith a Vanguard founder.3. Ed Hansen, Unpublished interview with Susan Stryker. 15 October 1998, 2.4. Ed Hansen, Letter to Parents, February 26, 1966; June 19, 1966, GLBT HistoricalSociety of Northern California.5. Joel Roberts, Personal interview with Daniel Bao, December 18, 1989.6. Ed Hansen, Letter to Parents, July 25, 1966, GLBT Historical Society of NorthernCalifornia.7. Stephan Cohen, The Gay Liberation Youth Movement in New York (New York:Routledge, 2008).8. Chuck Lewis, Personal interview with Jallen Rix, July 22, 2006.9. A similar situation existed until 1966 at the nearby Compton’s Cafeteria, wherea gay male night manager allowed young drag queens <strong>and</strong> hustlers to hang outwithout spending money. Such arrangements provide an interesting countermodelto the symbolic function of the figure of the child in the heteronormativeimaginary, as articulated <strong>and</strong> critiqued by Lee Edelman in his monograph NoFuture. In contrast to the heteronormative discourse that uses arguments about“protecting the children” <strong>and</strong> “child as future” to dismantle the rights of queeradults in the present, the gay community in this example recognized <strong>and</strong> valuedthese youth not as a metaphor for the gay community’s own future, nor as a54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!