straight line. Debate <strong>and</strong> diversity are stifledwhen theoretical difference is reduced tospatial distance on a single time-line thatsupposedly gauges progress from more primitiveto more advanced states <strong>of</strong> thought.The question posed by Changing Subjectsis not "which theories correspond to actuality?"but rather: "how have various theoriesworked historically <strong>and</strong> politically foror against (which) women's interests?"Gayle Greene <strong>and</strong> others argue that thirdwavefeminist theory, for all its potentiallyliberating powers, has ultimately played intothe h<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> political reactionaries by beingunconcerned with the pragmatics <strong>of</strong> change.In the present age <strong>of</strong> "post-feminism" <strong>and</strong>the anti-feminist backlash, "it's no accidentthat this [unpragmatic approach] is thegoing thing" (Greene). Quoting NicoleWard Jouve <strong>and</strong> Nancy K. Miller, Greeneworries that women "have been asked to goalong with Deconstruction whilst we havenot even got to the Construction stage. Youmust have a self before you can afford todeconstruct it. ... Only those who have itcan play with not having it."A number <strong>of</strong> contributors to the collectionidentify biases in the criteria determiningwhat counts as "theory," <strong>and</strong> analyzethe way theory presently functions in theacademy to distribute authority unevenlybetween women <strong>and</strong> men (<strong>and</strong> honorarymen). When "theory" is narrowly associatedwith names such as Lacan, Foucault,<strong>and</strong> Derrida, once again "a group <strong>of</strong> whitemale-authored canonical texts is at the centre."The worry is that when feminist scholars<strong>and</strong> theorists invoke these "big names"to establish their credentials, they are consolidatingthe very structures <strong>of</strong> authoritythey are concerned to dismantle.E. Ann Kaplan's Motherhood <strong>and</strong>Representation <strong>of</strong>fers itself as a case inpoint. Kaplan spends considerable energy<strong>and</strong> many pages discussing Freud, Lacan,<strong>and</strong> various feminist revisions <strong>of</strong> theirwork; she also endeavours to link psychoanalyticinsights with certain Marxist fundamentals,<strong>and</strong> prefigures how they will allbe put to work in her analysis <strong>of</strong> fictional,dramatic, <strong>and</strong> filmic narratives. She evenincludes two theoretical appendices in themain body <strong>of</strong> the text. All <strong>of</strong> which is to saythat Kaplan's theoretical framework seemsto be designed to do much more than simplygenerate questions, categories <strong>of</strong> analysis,<strong>and</strong> new readings <strong>of</strong> the popularcultural texts on which she focusses. It'stempting to say that the theoretical sections<strong>of</strong> Kaplan's book function largely to signifyher authority. But if this is the case, why isher painstakingly forged badge <strong>of</strong> intellectualauthority not worn up front in thebook's title? Has someone decided that thisis not "real theory" after all, but only "feministtheory"? Freudian <strong>and</strong> Lacanian theoriesplay an extremely ambivalent role inKaplan's discourse: at times, they boost herauthority; elsewhere, they are examinedcritically as discursive instruments forkeeping women in their place; on otheroccasions, Kaplan invokes them with a fundamentalistfaith in their literal truthvalue,<strong>and</strong> proceeds to use them as skeletonkeys to unlock all puzzles <strong>of</strong> character <strong>and</strong>narrative.Kaplan analyses the mother in threeseparate but (confusingly) related representationalspheres—the historical, the psychoanalytic,<strong>and</strong> the fictional. (FollowingLacan, she assumes the "real life" mother isunrepresentable.) Analyzing the historicallife <strong>of</strong> narratives, she establishes interestinglinks between nineteenth-century melodrama<strong>and</strong> twentieth-century film, <strong>and</strong>between new reproductive technologies<strong>and</strong> sex, work <strong>and</strong> mother/fatherhood. Yetshe does not pursue the materialist level <strong>of</strong>analysis in as much detail as she could have;she lapses on occasion into essentialism,gender stereotyping, <strong>and</strong> circular argument;<strong>and</strong> there are some weak links <strong>of</strong>vague speculation in certain <strong>of</strong> her chains<strong>of</strong> logic. It is difficult to predict whether135
Books in <strong>Review</strong>Kaplan's elaborate but rickety theoreticalframework will form a foundation forfuture feminist scholarship <strong>and</strong> theory.Caribbean Word PowerChristian HabekostVerbal Riddim: the Politics <strong>and</strong> Aesthetics <strong>of</strong>African-Caribbean Dub Poetry. Rodopi US$44.00Pamela Mordecaide Man: a Performance Poem. Sister Vision $10.95M. Nourbese PhilipShe Tries Her Tongue, Her Silence S<strong>of</strong>tly Breaks.Ragweed $11.95<strong>Review</strong>ed by Brenda CarrChristian Habekost blends a formalist <strong>and</strong>cultural studies approach to engage the"word, sound, power" aesthetic <strong>of</strong> African-Caribbean dub poetry <strong>and</strong> provide a correctivefor a critical problem he diagnosesat the outset <strong>of</strong> Verbal Riddim. That themusical press has given the dub mediumattention, while the academic press has typicallydismissed it is symptomatic <strong>of</strong> thechallenge posed by a hybrid cultural formin which spoken word lyrics are <strong>of</strong>tenaccompanied by reggae rhythms in a liveperformance context. Habekost's answer isa "methodological pluralism" comprised <strong>of</strong>complex engagement with relevant culturespecificpolitical, social, <strong>and</strong> aesthetic contexts,as well as "old-fashioned" closereading. This is an important interventionfor those sceptics who see formalism <strong>and</strong>theory as incompatible approaches. It isalso appropriate for a volume that appearsas #10 <strong>of</strong> the Cross/Cultures series. TheWestern reader is not naturally an ideal orcompetent reader <strong>of</strong> dub poetry. We neednew forms <strong>of</strong> cultural literacy for cross-culturalencounters.In his close readings, Habekost models asound working method for reading dubpoems in light <strong>of</strong> a sound/performance aesthetic.He is meticulously attentive to multiple"versions" <strong>of</strong> dub poems—printed,recorded, <strong>and</strong> live performance. This iscontextualized within a useful cultural history<strong>of</strong> dub, including protagonists, majorevents, times, <strong>and</strong> places, along with introductionto relevant cultural frameworkssuch as the Jamaican popular music scene,dance-hall DJ talkover, Rastafarianism, <strong>and</strong>the evolution <strong>of</strong> Jamaican patois as a legitimateform <strong>of</strong> English. Kingston, Jamaica,London, Engl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Toronto are threemetropolitan centres where dub poetry hasflourished since the early 1980's. Key playersin the international dub scene includeJamaicans Oku Onuora <strong>and</strong> Mutabaruka;Linton Kwesi Johnson, Jean Binta Breeze,<strong>and</strong> Benjamin Zephaniah from Engl<strong>and</strong>;<strong>and</strong> Lillian Allen, Clifton Joseph, <strong>and</strong> AhdriZhina M<strong>and</strong>iela, each <strong>of</strong> Toronto.My quibbles with Habekost are small.There is a hint <strong>of</strong> unexamined culturaltourism in Habekost's references to the"exotic beats" <strong>of</strong> Reggae, to the "blackenigma," <strong>and</strong> to Oku Onuora's prison biographyas a "spectacular adventure story."Despite Habekost's careful attention tocontext, some <strong>of</strong> his social assumptionsprovide a cautionary tale for how difficult itis to undo centuries <strong>of</strong> self/other conditioningin Western colonial history.Habekost's book could have used some <strong>of</strong>the dynamic "verbal riddims" <strong>of</strong> themedium under study. It is somewhat plodding,repetitive, <strong>and</strong> cumbersome in itsweighty citations. However, it exemplifiesan ethical undertaking to engage dub as aserious art form. Habekost upholds theneed for the ongoing expansion <strong>of</strong> dubpoetry's repertoire <strong>and</strong> range in order for itto continue as a living, changing medium.This is true <strong>of</strong> all poetry; it must keep anear to the ground, an eye to the street,reflecting the pulsing <strong>and</strong> changing lifeconcerns <strong>of</strong> the communities to which itgives witness.While Jamaican Pamela Mordecai's deMan: A Performance Poem <strong>and</strong> Tobagoian136
- Page 1 and 2:
A Quarterly of Criticism and Review
- Page 3 and 4:
Editorialand cultural cliché. Both
- Page 5:
RobertB r i n g h u r s tZhàozhou
- Page 8 and 9:
was the later opinion of Frank Tayl
- Page 10 and 11:
self-entrapment and death, Patrick
- Page 13 and 14:
Lowrystopped talking more than a ne
- Page 15 and 16:
LowrySeen as a pictural surface, as
- Page 17 and 18:
Lowryto exist first and foremost in
- Page 19 and 20:
L o w r yself-making, he needed to
- Page 21 and 22:
Lowry"Excessive because language ca
- Page 23 and 24:
Lowry, ed. Swinging in the Maelstro
- Page 25 and 26:
LeaLittlewolfcoldI dreamrasp breath
- Page 27 and 28:
BoasWriting, even writing which aim
- Page 29 and 30:
BoasMuch was done by Dr. Franz Boas
- Page 31 and 32:
Boasapplicable to every society and
- Page 33 and 34:
When we discover that there are sev
- Page 35 and 36:
Boasinto the camera, and speak to s
- Page 37 and 38:
Boasform of distortion that involve
- Page 39 and 40:
he alone has access) which he heard
- Page 41 and 42:
Boasawkwardness, strangeness and "e
- Page 43 and 44:
Boasitself; his own narratology her
- Page 45 and 46:
Boasstories to suit his own tonal a
- Page 47 and 48:
DavidMcGimpseyToo Much Slouching,No
- Page 49 and 50:
DavidHeinimannIronized ManA Jest of
- Page 51 and 52:
Laurence & A t w o o drather what i
- Page 53 and 54:
Laurence & A t w o o dtional. What
- Page 55 and 56:
Laurence & A t w o o dfrom him, kep
- Page 57 and 58:
L a u r e n c e & A t w o o dhe can
- Page 59 and 60:
L a u r e n c e 8t A t w o o dmade
- Page 61 and 62:
L a u r e n c e fit A t w o o diron
- Page 63 and 64:
L a u r e n c e fit A t w o o di Wo
- Page 65 and 66:
BeverleyBrahicObjets d'ArtSliding i
- Page 67 and 68:
TomWaymanA poet is allowed to use t
- Page 69 and 70:
JohnPassAristotle's LanternWhen per
- Page 71 and 72:
K a t h l e e nW a l lRepresenting
- Page 73 and 74:
A t w o o d & M u n r othe nature o
- Page 75 and 76:
A t w o o d & Munroindividual autho
- Page 77 and 78:
A t w o o d & M u n r ofrom pain. I
- Page 79 and 80:
A t w o o d & M u n r oto me, after
- Page 81 and 82: A t w o o d & M u n r oauthority al
- Page 83 and 84: A t w o o d 8* Munroinert and unoff
- Page 85 and 86: At wood & MunroNOTES1 I am here ent
- Page 87 and 88: A t w o o d & MunriLanser, Susan. F
- Page 89 and 90: CraigB u r n e t tLandscape with Co
- Page 91 and 92: JamieOoppAffirming Mysteryin Eric M
- Page 93 and 94: McCormackthat the smell emanates fr
- Page 95 and 96: McCormackdevice of texts within tex
- Page 97 and 98: McCormackgood to live," so the worl
- Page 99 and 100: McCormackclaim, in his introduction
- Page 101 and 102: McCormackkeywords, which is appropr
- Page 103 and 104: McCormackThe Carrick festival also
- Page 105 and 106: McCormack1 My own preference is to
- Page 107 and 108: RobertB r i n g h u r s tThe Living
- Page 109 and 110: Books in Reviewof cannibalism, were
- Page 111 and 112: Books in Reviewautobiographical, ge
- Page 113 and 114: Books in ReviewBeran's conclusion e
- Page 115 and 116: Books in Reviewhave, despite all th
- Page 117 and 118: Books in Reviewliterary and social
- Page 119 and 120: Books in Reviewmen. Some would say
- Page 121 and 122: Books in ReviewPoets as true Genius
- Page 123 and 124: Books in ReviewIn a similar way, Mc
- Page 125 and 126: Books in Reviewreproduced in black
- Page 127 and 128: Books in ReviewThe engaging indirec
- Page 129 and 130: Books in Reviewpoem or an entire ge
- Page 131: Books in Reviewof its scale and den
- Page 135 and 136: Books in Reviewand in regaining cul
- Page 137 and 138: Books in Reviewevents and the story
- Page 139 and 140: Books in ReviewIn "The Side of the
- Page 141 and 142: Books in Reviewtask. Utilizing cont
- Page 143 and 144: Books in Reviewan exhilarating sens
- Page 145 and 146: Books in ReviiA Daughter's DilemmaJ
- Page 147 and 148: Books in Reviewopening—"In the be
- Page 149 and 150: Books in Reviewand "lidded with app
- Page 151 and 152: Books in Reviewits sombre social re
- Page 153 and 154: Books in Reviewstudy is lucid and i
- Page 155 and 156: Books in Reviewdemographics in the
- Page 157 and 158: Books in Review"référence littér
- Page 159 and 160: Books in Reviewdiacy of the dialogu
- Page 161 and 162: Books in Reviewand biting in sunles
- Page 163 and 164: Books in ReviewMétis from Webster'
- Page 165 and 166: Books in Reviewof critical authorit
- Page 167 and 168: Books in Reviewher mother "defied a
- Page 169 and 170: Books in Reviewtion with "Goodbye,"
- Page 171 and 172: Books in ReviewScheuermann examines
- Page 173 and 174: Books in ReviewOn a less serious no
- Page 175 and 176: Books in ReviewVoices and ChoicesJa
- Page 177 and 178: Books in Reviewtemps à coups de co
- Page 179 and 180: Books in Reviewhomes symbolically r
- Page 181 and 182: B o o k s in R e v i e wpossibly—
- Page 183 and 184:
Books in Reviewthis poem, both the
- Page 185 and 186:
L a s tP a gMapping 1996W.H. NewAt
- Page 187 and 188:
L a s tP a g e sa lot of readers, I
- Page 189 and 190:
LastPagesbetween inheritance and en
- Page 191 and 192:
L a s tP a g e srary British Columb
- Page 193 and 194:
LastPagesFurther, Bourdieu's assert
- Page 195 and 196:
L a s tP a g e sapply nonetheless.
- Page 197 and 198:
LastPagesBringhurst's The Calling:
- Page 199 and 200:
LastPagesretire their legs, those c