When Jeannie's labor pains begin to intensify, the narrator reports: "At themoment she can't remember why she wanted to have a baby in the firstplace. That decision was made by someone else, whose motives are nowunclear" (239). When yet another strong contraction begins, Jeannie'soptions seem to be escape or dissociation from her body: "she slips backinto the dark place, which is not hell, which is more like being inside, tryingto get out. Out, she says or thinks... . When there is no pain, she feels nothing,when there is pain, she feels nothing because there is no she" (241).Frequently, this disconnection is related to the inadequacy <strong>of</strong> a languagethat has no words for "the events <strong>of</strong> the body" (239), for the kind <strong>of</strong> pain or"whatever it is" (240) that she is experiencing. The fact that there is no she isaccounted for by the "disappearance <strong>of</strong> language" (241). 5But Jeannie's disconnection from her body is mainly projected onto "theother woman," a pregnant figure that Jeannie may actually have seen a couple<strong>of</strong> times, but who is "not real in the usual sense" (235). Jeannie may feel thatthe decision to have a baby "was made by someone else whose motives arenow unclear," <strong>and</strong> that the language for her experience is inadequate. But "theother woman's" pregnancy has even less to do with her own volition; <strong>and</strong>the language for what is about to happen to her is even more non-existent:She, like Jeannie, is going to the hospital. She too is pregnant. She is not goingto the hospital to give birth, however, because the word, the words, are too aliento her experience, the experience she is about to have, to be used about it atall. . . . She is a woman who did not wish to become pregnant, who did notchoose to divide herself like this, who did not choose any <strong>of</strong> these ordeals, theseinitiations. It would be no use telling her that everything is going to be fine. Theword in English for unwanted intercourse is rape, but there is no word in the languagefor what is about to happen to this woman. (234; italics mine)Placing the "other woman" in a mise en abyme allows Atwood to depict whatis paradoxically contained in yet absent from Jeannie's own experience.Consider again The Arnolfini Marriage (with its pregnant woman), <strong>and</strong> theconvex mirror (the obverse <strong>of</strong> Irigaray's concave mirror) that depicts what isjust outside the represented plane: the wedding guests, the painter, the couple'sbacks. Yet <strong>of</strong> course, the picture does represent these others in theirdistorted, mirrored forms; they are there <strong>and</strong> not there; they are simultaneouslyoutside the space the artist represents, yet are inserted into that representation.Similarly, the other woman, who is real <strong>and</strong> "not real in the usualsense," shadows Jeannie throughout her experience <strong>of</strong> giving birth, representingthe "other" side <strong>of</strong> childbirth. It is the "other woman" who screams79
A t w o o d & M u n r <strong>of</strong>rom pain. It is the "other woman" who doesn't want to have a baby—perhaps,Jeannie hypothesizes, because she's been raped, because she has tenother children, because she's poor <strong>and</strong> starving. It is the "other woman"whose childbirth is fraught with complications (238). In other words, Jeanniecan project the anxieties that she doesn't want fully to claim onto the otherwoman. Such a projection expresses Jeannie's disconnection from her body'spotential experience <strong>and</strong> her fears. Thus, "the other woman," who occupiesa miniature, distorted place in Jeannie's narrative <strong>of</strong> giving birth, allowsJeannie to construct the saving fiction that it is "other women" who are[more] disconnected from the experiences <strong>of</strong> their bodies, <strong>and</strong> that thesedisconnections are caused by external circumstances (like rape or poverty),not by some inherent disconnection between [the female] body <strong>and</strong> mind.As the recipient <strong>of</strong> these projections, the other woman also functions as atalisman. The morning after her daughter's birth, Jeannie hears footsteps inthe hallway: "She thinks it must be the other woman, in her brown <strong>and</strong>maroon checked coat, carrying her paper bag, leaving the hospital now thather job is done. She has seen Jeannie safely through, she must go now tohunt through the streets <strong>of</strong> the city for her next case" (245). In someuncomfortable way, then, she seems both to protect <strong>and</strong> represent all thosewomen whose experience <strong>of</strong> childbirth does not involve choice, supportivehusb<strong>and</strong>s, natural childbirth, healthy <strong>and</strong> desired babies, <strong>and</strong> she thus symbolizesall <strong>of</strong> the possible ways in which women can be alienated from theexperience <strong>of</strong> giving birth.But just as this figure plays the "other woman" to Jeannie, so does Jeannieplay the other woman for the narrator, who wants both to claim <strong>and</strong> disclaimidentity with Jeannie, though, in the telling <strong>of</strong> the story <strong>of</strong> Jeannie'schildbirth, the gap between the two is slowly closed. The first sentences afterthe preamble about the inadequacy <strong>of</strong> language deny any equivalence betweenthe narrator <strong>and</strong> Jeannie: "This story about giving birth is not about me. Inorder to convince you <strong>of</strong> that I should tell you what I did this morning,before I sat down at this desk" (229). Yet her pro<strong>of</strong> is not particularly convincing;in fact, one is all but directed to wonder how this description <strong>of</strong> amorning with a child proves that she is not some one who gave birth.Once Jeannie's story properly begins, the narrator makes use <strong>of</strong> severaltechniques that keep to the fore her ambiguous relationship to Jeannie. Onone h<strong>and</strong>, Jeannie's story is told in the present tense, a kind <strong>of</strong> Atwoodiananti-convention that theoretically makes the narrative immediate, but that80
- Page 1 and 2:
A Quarterly of Criticism and Review
- Page 3 and 4:
Editorialand cultural cliché. Both
- Page 5:
RobertB r i n g h u r s tZhàozhou
- Page 8 and 9:
was the later opinion of Frank Tayl
- Page 10 and 11:
self-entrapment and death, Patrick
- Page 13 and 14:
Lowrystopped talking more than a ne
- Page 15 and 16:
LowrySeen as a pictural surface, as
- Page 17 and 18:
Lowryto exist first and foremost in
- Page 19 and 20:
L o w r yself-making, he needed to
- Page 21 and 22:
Lowry"Excessive because language ca
- Page 23 and 24:
Lowry, ed. Swinging in the Maelstro
- Page 25 and 26: LeaLittlewolfcoldI dreamrasp breath
- Page 27 and 28: BoasWriting, even writing which aim
- Page 29 and 30: BoasMuch was done by Dr. Franz Boas
- Page 31 and 32: Boasapplicable to every society and
- Page 33 and 34: When we discover that there are sev
- Page 35 and 36: Boasinto the camera, and speak to s
- Page 37 and 38: Boasform of distortion that involve
- Page 39 and 40: he alone has access) which he heard
- Page 41 and 42: Boasawkwardness, strangeness and "e
- Page 43 and 44: Boasitself; his own narratology her
- Page 45 and 46: Boasstories to suit his own tonal a
- Page 47 and 48: DavidMcGimpseyToo Much Slouching,No
- Page 49 and 50: DavidHeinimannIronized ManA Jest of
- Page 51 and 52: Laurence & A t w o o drather what i
- Page 53 and 54: Laurence & A t w o o dtional. What
- Page 55 and 56: Laurence & A t w o o dfrom him, kep
- Page 57 and 58: L a u r e n c e & A t w o o dhe can
- Page 59 and 60: L a u r e n c e 8t A t w o o dmade
- Page 61 and 62: L a u r e n c e fit A t w o o diron
- Page 63 and 64: L a u r e n c e fit A t w o o di Wo
- Page 65 and 66: BeverleyBrahicObjets d'ArtSliding i
- Page 67 and 68: TomWaymanA poet is allowed to use t
- Page 69 and 70: JohnPassAristotle's LanternWhen per
- Page 71 and 72: K a t h l e e nW a l lRepresenting
- Page 73 and 74: A t w o o d & M u n r othe nature o
- Page 75: A t w o o d & Munroindividual autho
- Page 79 and 80: A t w o o d & M u n r oto me, after
- Page 81 and 82: A t w o o d & M u n r oauthority al
- Page 83 and 84: A t w o o d 8* Munroinert and unoff
- Page 85 and 86: At wood & MunroNOTES1 I am here ent
- Page 87 and 88: A t w o o d & MunriLanser, Susan. F
- Page 89 and 90: CraigB u r n e t tLandscape with Co
- Page 91 and 92: JamieOoppAffirming Mysteryin Eric M
- Page 93 and 94: McCormackthat the smell emanates fr
- Page 95 and 96: McCormackdevice of texts within tex
- Page 97 and 98: McCormackgood to live," so the worl
- Page 99 and 100: McCormackclaim, in his introduction
- Page 101 and 102: McCormackkeywords, which is appropr
- Page 103 and 104: McCormackThe Carrick festival also
- Page 105 and 106: McCormack1 My own preference is to
- Page 107 and 108: RobertB r i n g h u r s tThe Living
- Page 109 and 110: Books in Reviewof cannibalism, were
- Page 111 and 112: Books in Reviewautobiographical, ge
- Page 113 and 114: Books in ReviewBeran's conclusion e
- Page 115 and 116: Books in Reviewhave, despite all th
- Page 117 and 118: Books in Reviewliterary and social
- Page 119 and 120: Books in Reviewmen. Some would say
- Page 121 and 122: Books in ReviewPoets as true Genius
- Page 123 and 124: Books in ReviewIn a similar way, Mc
- Page 125 and 126: Books in Reviewreproduced in black
- Page 127 and 128:
Books in ReviewThe engaging indirec
- Page 129 and 130:
Books in Reviewpoem or an entire ge
- Page 131 and 132:
Books in Reviewof its scale and den
- Page 133 and 134:
Books in ReviewKaplan's elaborate b
- Page 135 and 136:
Books in Reviewand in regaining cul
- Page 137 and 138:
Books in Reviewevents and the story
- Page 139 and 140:
Books in ReviewIn "The Side of the
- Page 141 and 142:
Books in Reviewtask. Utilizing cont
- Page 143 and 144:
Books in Reviewan exhilarating sens
- Page 145 and 146:
Books in ReviiA Daughter's DilemmaJ
- Page 147 and 148:
Books in Reviewopening—"In the be
- Page 149 and 150:
Books in Reviewand "lidded with app
- Page 151 and 152:
Books in Reviewits sombre social re
- Page 153 and 154:
Books in Reviewstudy is lucid and i
- Page 155 and 156:
Books in Reviewdemographics in the
- Page 157 and 158:
Books in Review"référence littér
- Page 159 and 160:
Books in Reviewdiacy of the dialogu
- Page 161 and 162:
Books in Reviewand biting in sunles
- Page 163 and 164:
Books in ReviewMétis from Webster'
- Page 165 and 166:
Books in Reviewof critical authorit
- Page 167 and 168:
Books in Reviewher mother "defied a
- Page 169 and 170:
Books in Reviewtion with "Goodbye,"
- Page 171 and 172:
Books in ReviewScheuermann examines
- Page 173 and 174:
Books in ReviewOn a less serious no
- Page 175 and 176:
Books in ReviewVoices and ChoicesJa
- Page 177 and 178:
Books in Reviewtemps à coups de co
- Page 179 and 180:
Books in Reviewhomes symbolically r
- Page 181 and 182:
B o o k s in R e v i e wpossibly—
- Page 183 and 184:
Books in Reviewthis poem, both the
- Page 185 and 186:
L a s tP a gMapping 1996W.H. NewAt
- Page 187 and 188:
L a s tP a g e sa lot of readers, I
- Page 189 and 190:
LastPagesbetween inheritance and en
- Page 191 and 192:
L a s tP a g e srary British Columb
- Page 193 and 194:
LastPagesFurther, Bourdieu's assert
- Page 195 and 196:
L a s tP a g e sapply nonetheless.
- Page 197 and 198:
LastPagesBringhurst's The Calling:
- Page 199 and 200:
LastPagesretire their legs, those c