substitute high school teacher <strong>and</strong> wouldbenovelist who'll have nothing to do withhis wife's TV enterprises though living constantlyin their shadows, <strong>of</strong>fers his sonrepeated doses <strong>of</strong> sanity <strong>and</strong> perspective,coated in bracing wit. Peter's bible isGulliver's Travels, "a book to be consulted ...when one is set upon by optimism ...plagued with hope <strong>and</strong> cheerfulness,"father advises son. But satire is ultimatelyno match for Audrey's scheme <strong>of</strong> "keepingthe family intact" by living the future in TV.From the Prendergasts's sixteenth floorToronto condo she launches her secondventure, "The Philo Farnsworth Show," afoolish <strong>and</strong> fabulously successful seriesabout the invention <strong>of</strong> television in whichHenry spends his adolescence playing leadingman. Eventually incapable <strong>of</strong> bearingsuch a weight <strong>of</strong> unreality, the familynucleus splits, blasting Henry out <strong>of</strong> anoverextended infancy (TV would makeinfants <strong>of</strong> us all) into the swirling realm <strong>of</strong>mysterious motives <strong>and</strong> puzzling betrayalsin which mature folk most <strong>of</strong>ten dwell.For all its engaging zaniness <strong>and</strong> comicdistortion, Human Amusements is fundamentallyabout the hard experience <strong>of</strong>growing up—hard in any age, but complicatedin Henry's by the mass popular fictionsthat promise the protections <strong>of</strong>infancy in the form <strong>of</strong> simplistic moral certitudes.It is Henry's powerful sense <strong>of</strong> hisunintended complicity in his family'sbreakup that thrusts him into the world <strong>of</strong>guilt <strong>and</strong> sorrow where he can finally beginto see his parents—reunited but unreconciled—asAudrey <strong>and</strong> Peter, the complicated,groping, victimized <strong>and</strong> victimizingmixed affairs not even fantasy or his childishneed can keep them from being.Russell Smith's take on coming-<strong>of</strong>-age inHow Insensitive, short-listed for theSmithBooks/ Books in Canada First NovelAward <strong>and</strong> the Governor-General's for1994, also reels out in Toronto, but not theToronto the Good <strong>of</strong> distant memory orthe Toronto the Not-As-Good <strong>of</strong> Johnston's1960s <strong>and</strong> 70s setting. Ted Owen <strong>of</strong> NewBrunswick, by way <strong>of</strong> a master's program incultural studies at Concordia, arrives bytrain in "glittering" Toronto thePostmodern—a city whose recognizablestreet names <strong>and</strong> neighborhoods <strong>and</strong> contemporaneitymake it no more substantialthan those earlier urban incarnations—to"try to get into film," he thinks, or "somekind <strong>of</strong> writing." An ingénu despite hisM.A., Ted is quickly immersed in the heretoday-gone-tomorrowworlds <strong>of</strong> lifestylemagazines (bearing trendy names likeReferent, Haze, Cities, Next, ApacheSurgery), voguish dance clubs (Spleen,Dionysus, Penumbra, Aquarium,Holocaust), <strong>and</strong> a cultural life made up <strong>of</strong>film promotion, grant writing, low endexperimental theater, <strong>and</strong> talk TV. HisMaritimer's innocence, though no perfectcharm, permits him to move through theseworlds remarkably unscathed. Not that he'simmune to this Canadian vanity fair'stemptations: he falls for two women atonce <strong>and</strong> becomes sexually entangled witha third, he falls easily into habits <strong>of</strong> selfpromotionbased on bogus credits, he fallsinto fashion. And in one <strong>of</strong> many resemblancesto Hawthorne's Robin Molineux,he falls into imagining that someone else, asophisticate named Max whom he met onthe Toronto train, will fix him up, get hiscareer <strong>and</strong> future moving, help him makehis way. When the humiliation <strong>of</strong> having tolive on h<strong>and</strong>outs from his mother <strong>and</strong>father grows intolerable, Ted weakens,accepting a job with a s<strong>of</strong>tware companywriting manuals ("I have a cubicle with acomputer <strong>and</strong> my very own noticeboard,"he writes a friend)—the "veal-fatteningpen" fate that caused Douglas Coupl<strong>and</strong>'sCanadian Generation Xet, Dag, to flee thisvery city. Ted is also tempted to flee, back tothe womb <strong>of</strong> graduate school, but a series<strong>of</strong> freeing epiphanies triggered by desperation<strong>and</strong> a glorious winter thaw, as well as145
Books in <strong>Review</strong>an exhilarating sense <strong>of</strong> the possibility <strong>of</strong>his making his own future, leave him at thenovel's close in Toronto "with a sudden <strong>and</strong>intense feeling <strong>of</strong> relief, <strong>of</strong> relaxation, <strong>of</strong>arriving home."Whether Ted Owen's coming-<strong>of</strong>-age is asauthentic or durable as HenryPrendergast's is impossible to say. RussellSmith, after all, is more interested indeploying his protagonist as a recorder <strong>of</strong>the vacuous, sensation-driven realm <strong>of</strong>Toronto chic in the early 90s than in developingcharacter. And in this he succeedsnot with a novice's luck but genuine talent.His club scenes erupt in satiric flame, hisrenderings <strong>of</strong> Rosedale's twenty-somethingsleave no prisoners, his images <strong>of</strong>Toronto's cultural hip <strong>and</strong> hipsters aresharp <strong>and</strong> devastating. Yet behind all thisone senses Smith's fascination with theimpulse to make things new that to somedegree generates the very curiosities he caricatures.Whether he can or wishes to movefrom the role <strong>of</strong> satirist to Wayne Johnston'sposition <strong>of</strong> introspective, humane storytelleronly further novels will tell. On thebasis <strong>of</strong> How Insensitive they're well worthwaiting for.InteranimationsHilda KirkwoodBetween the Lines. Oberon $12.95<strong>Review</strong>ed by Catherine AddisonBetween the Lines is a collection <strong>of</strong> interviewsconducted by Hilda Kirkwood withvarious Canadian writers <strong>and</strong> artists. It iscompelling reading, mainly because <strong>of</strong>Kirkwood's rapport with her subjects. Eventhough the discussions include lively debateon such issues as gender, censorship, theAmerican influence <strong>and</strong> the crafts <strong>of</strong> writing<strong>and</strong> sculpture, much <strong>of</strong> the interest <strong>of</strong>the book lies in the sense <strong>of</strong> relationshipsunfolding.Kirkwood has selected her subjects carefully.They are all people whom she clearlyholds in esteem <strong>and</strong> all except one—so shetells us in her headnote—are acquaintances<strong>of</strong> hers already. She is a virtuoso in theolder sense, a collector. Her collection consists<strong>of</strong> Margaret Laurence, Joe Rosenblatt,Robertson Davies, Aritha van Herk, LeonRooke, Almuth Lutkenhaus, WilliamMcElcheran, Barker Fairley, Northrop Frye,Joan Murray <strong>and</strong> Tom Marshall (who diedjust before he was to be interviewed <strong>and</strong> sois represented only by a tribute). She shows<strong>of</strong>f her collection in the special light <strong>of</strong> herintelligent appreciation, which may be thebest kind <strong>of</strong> illumination for most people.Freed from the necessity <strong>of</strong> defendingthemselves, they are able to unmask <strong>and</strong>disarm; they do not feel compelled to consistencybut may go <strong>of</strong>f on revealing tangents,fascinating digressions.One <strong>of</strong> Kirkwood's best ploys is to use, inher questions, metaphors that seem appropriateto the artist or work. Of JoeRosenblatt, poet <strong>of</strong>fish <strong>and</strong> insect life, sheinquires: "Are the poet's antennae moredeveloped, or has he got better equipmentfor finding the depths?" And Rosenblatttaking <strong>and</strong> passing the thread, willinglyweaves his own motifs into the conversation:"Only a masochist would write abouthis or her job experience. Better to observethose super-prols [bees] buzzing away attheir blessed productions." Leon Rooke,questioned about his ability to "tap into"both male <strong>and</strong> female in his fiction, commutesKirkwood's metaphor into "networking]both continents <strong>of</strong> the psyche"<strong>and</strong> "entering] other skins." OnlyRobertson Davies refuses to take up thiskind <strong>of</strong> cue. Asked whether a "Merlin orProspero myth" underlies the action <strong>of</strong> AMixture <strong>of</strong> Frailties, he replies grumpily that"To talk <strong>of</strong> a Magician Theme is to miss thetruth <strong>of</strong> the story." Kirkwood perhaps getsher revenge in her interview with the sculptorAlmuth Lutkenhaus, who is quite happy146
- Page 1 and 2:
A Quarterly of Criticism and Review
- Page 3 and 4:
Editorialand cultural cliché. Both
- Page 5:
RobertB r i n g h u r s tZhàozhou
- Page 8 and 9:
was the later opinion of Frank Tayl
- Page 10 and 11:
self-entrapment and death, Patrick
- Page 13 and 14:
Lowrystopped talking more than a ne
- Page 15 and 16:
LowrySeen as a pictural surface, as
- Page 17 and 18:
Lowryto exist first and foremost in
- Page 19 and 20:
L o w r yself-making, he needed to
- Page 21 and 22:
Lowry"Excessive because language ca
- Page 23 and 24:
Lowry, ed. Swinging in the Maelstro
- Page 25 and 26:
LeaLittlewolfcoldI dreamrasp breath
- Page 27 and 28:
BoasWriting, even writing which aim
- Page 29 and 30:
BoasMuch was done by Dr. Franz Boas
- Page 31 and 32:
Boasapplicable to every society and
- Page 33 and 34:
When we discover that there are sev
- Page 35 and 36:
Boasinto the camera, and speak to s
- Page 37 and 38:
Boasform of distortion that involve
- Page 39 and 40:
he alone has access) which he heard
- Page 41 and 42:
Boasawkwardness, strangeness and "e
- Page 43 and 44:
Boasitself; his own narratology her
- Page 45 and 46:
Boasstories to suit his own tonal a
- Page 47 and 48:
DavidMcGimpseyToo Much Slouching,No
- Page 49 and 50:
DavidHeinimannIronized ManA Jest of
- Page 51 and 52:
Laurence & A t w o o drather what i
- Page 53 and 54:
Laurence & A t w o o dtional. What
- Page 55 and 56:
Laurence & A t w o o dfrom him, kep
- Page 57 and 58:
L a u r e n c e & A t w o o dhe can
- Page 59 and 60:
L a u r e n c e 8t A t w o o dmade
- Page 61 and 62:
L a u r e n c e fit A t w o o diron
- Page 63 and 64:
L a u r e n c e fit A t w o o di Wo
- Page 65 and 66:
BeverleyBrahicObjets d'ArtSliding i
- Page 67 and 68:
TomWaymanA poet is allowed to use t
- Page 69 and 70:
JohnPassAristotle's LanternWhen per
- Page 71 and 72:
K a t h l e e nW a l lRepresenting
- Page 73 and 74:
A t w o o d & M u n r othe nature o
- Page 75 and 76:
A t w o o d & Munroindividual autho
- Page 77 and 78:
A t w o o d & M u n r ofrom pain. I
- Page 79 and 80:
A t w o o d & M u n r oto me, after
- Page 81 and 82:
A t w o o d & M u n r oauthority al
- Page 83 and 84:
A t w o o d 8* Munroinert and unoff
- Page 85 and 86:
At wood & MunroNOTES1 I am here ent
- Page 87 and 88:
A t w o o d & MunriLanser, Susan. F
- Page 89 and 90:
CraigB u r n e t tLandscape with Co
- Page 91 and 92: JamieOoppAffirming Mysteryin Eric M
- Page 93 and 94: McCormackthat the smell emanates fr
- Page 95 and 96: McCormackdevice of texts within tex
- Page 97 and 98: McCormackgood to live," so the worl
- Page 99 and 100: McCormackclaim, in his introduction
- Page 101 and 102: McCormackkeywords, which is appropr
- Page 103 and 104: McCormackThe Carrick festival also
- Page 105 and 106: McCormack1 My own preference is to
- Page 107 and 108: RobertB r i n g h u r s tThe Living
- Page 109 and 110: Books in Reviewof cannibalism, were
- Page 111 and 112: Books in Reviewautobiographical, ge
- Page 113 and 114: Books in ReviewBeran's conclusion e
- Page 115 and 116: Books in Reviewhave, despite all th
- Page 117 and 118: Books in Reviewliterary and social
- Page 119 and 120: Books in Reviewmen. Some would say
- Page 121 and 122: Books in ReviewPoets as true Genius
- Page 123 and 124: Books in ReviewIn a similar way, Mc
- Page 125 and 126: Books in Reviewreproduced in black
- Page 127 and 128: Books in ReviewThe engaging indirec
- Page 129 and 130: Books in Reviewpoem or an entire ge
- Page 131 and 132: Books in Reviewof its scale and den
- Page 133 and 134: Books in ReviewKaplan's elaborate b
- Page 135 and 136: Books in Reviewand in regaining cul
- Page 137 and 138: Books in Reviewevents and the story
- Page 139 and 140: Books in ReviewIn "The Side of the
- Page 141: Books in Reviewtask. Utilizing cont
- Page 145 and 146: Books in ReviiA Daughter's DilemmaJ
- Page 147 and 148: Books in Reviewopening—"In the be
- Page 149 and 150: Books in Reviewand "lidded with app
- Page 151 and 152: Books in Reviewits sombre social re
- Page 153 and 154: Books in Reviewstudy is lucid and i
- Page 155 and 156: Books in Reviewdemographics in the
- Page 157 and 158: Books in Review"référence littér
- Page 159 and 160: Books in Reviewdiacy of the dialogu
- Page 161 and 162: Books in Reviewand biting in sunles
- Page 163 and 164: Books in ReviewMétis from Webster'
- Page 165 and 166: Books in Reviewof critical authorit
- Page 167 and 168: Books in Reviewher mother "defied a
- Page 169 and 170: Books in Reviewtion with "Goodbye,"
- Page 171 and 172: Books in ReviewScheuermann examines
- Page 173 and 174: Books in ReviewOn a less serious no
- Page 175 and 176: Books in ReviewVoices and ChoicesJa
- Page 177 and 178: Books in Reviewtemps à coups de co
- Page 179 and 180: Books in Reviewhomes symbolically r
- Page 181 and 182: B o o k s in R e v i e wpossibly—
- Page 183 and 184: Books in Reviewthis poem, both the
- Page 185 and 186: L a s tP a gMapping 1996W.H. NewAt
- Page 187 and 188: L a s tP a g e sa lot of readers, I
- Page 189 and 190: LastPagesbetween inheritance and en
- Page 191 and 192: L a s tP a g e srary British Columb
- Page 193 and 194:
LastPagesFurther, Bourdieu's assert
- Page 195 and 196:
L a s tP a g e sapply nonetheless.
- Page 197 and 198:
LastPagesBringhurst's The Calling:
- Page 199 and 200:
LastPagesretire their legs, those c