13.07.2015 Views

A Quarterly of Criticism and Review i^^^^^^^^fcEjfc $15

A Quarterly of Criticism and Review i^^^^^^^^fcEjfc $15

A Quarterly of Criticism and Review i^^^^^^^^fcEjfc $15

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Boasstories to suit his own tonal <strong>and</strong> conceptual dem<strong>and</strong>s. The stories herewrites are hybrids, as much his own as those <strong>of</strong> his appropriated subjects.What the reader finds manifest in such texts as the Kwakiutl Tales areepisodes, events, in this narrative process. Boas positions himself, finally, asif he were Kwakwaka'wakw—or at least, as he says, their finest friend—speaking through the stories he collects, correcting them to suit his ownvision <strong>of</strong> who the Kwakwaka'wakw essentially are. But instead <strong>of</strong> articulatingcultural difference <strong>and</strong> diversity, Boas imposes his own anthropologicalframework on this work, so that speaking for others, in this case, becomes amode <strong>of</strong> speaking for himself, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> narrating events in his own autobiography<strong>of</strong> progress <strong>and</strong> liberation through anthropology. The Kwakiutl Tales,despite their value as cultural artifacts, artifacts without which theKwakwaka'wakw would certainly be poorer, are indelibly overwritten byBoas's own personal narration, as he endeavours to construct his ownethnographic tale.For Boas, the interplay between the normal <strong>and</strong> the strange which conditionshis salvage <strong>and</strong> rescue <strong>of</strong> "other" cultures manifests itself as a narrative:not so much a cultural history—whether <strong>of</strong> others' or <strong>of</strong> his ownculture—as an autobiography, a writing <strong>of</strong> himself into the position <strong>of</strong> theprotagonist <strong>of</strong> the very texts <strong>and</strong> artifacts he aims to salvage, as the hero <strong>of</strong>his own life's work. The advocate <strong>and</strong> saviour described by his readers <strong>and</strong>interpreters is not simply the creation <strong>of</strong> a cult <strong>of</strong> admirers, but is based inBoas's own methods <strong>of</strong> collection, <strong>of</strong> transcription, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> rewriting. Thesemethods, finally, subtend a decidedly narrative presence, a tale-tellingwhich writes itself episodically into the interstices <strong>and</strong> the margins <strong>of</strong> themyths <strong>and</strong> stories Boas sought so ardently to preserve. The Native <strong>of</strong>fers theWhite dominant <strong>of</strong> North America, with Boas as its key scientific <strong>and</strong> culturalrepresentative, a functional counter-discursive space, in which thedominant discourse can discover itself as otherwise than it is, as fully selfconscious<strong>and</strong> fully known <strong>and</strong> articulated to itself, a space in which it canconstruct a "freer view" <strong>of</strong> its limitations, <strong>and</strong> thus assert its universalvalidity. In Boasian ethnography, the Native is "recovered" for the Whitecultural dominant, <strong>and</strong> installed in the position <strong>of</strong> the valuable Other, butan Other, this time, which cannot escape the determinations <strong>of</strong> the Whitedominant, which has been rewritten <strong>and</strong> overwritten by a narrative <strong>of</strong>White self-discovery.48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!