on Rachel's delusion makes it less evident that Nick has become a victimthan that Rachel has been wronged, but Rachel has wronged herself asmuch, if not more.Rejecting facades, Rachel is capable <strong>of</strong> a new assertiveness with Nick <strong>and</strong>is strengthened as she recognizes her weakness. The ambiguity <strong>of</strong> her newstatus is evident when she inwardly quotes John Donne to silence Nick: "ForGod's sake hold your tongue <strong>and</strong> let me love. But it's the man who is supposedto say that" (145). The assumption <strong>of</strong> male responsibility seems to repeatRachel's passivity earlier in the phone call to Nick, but here Laurence ironicallyshows Rachel's change. In quoting Donne, Rachel feels that conventionhampers the expression <strong>of</strong> her love. Her usurpation <strong>of</strong> the male role is ameans to mock the convention to discredit it <strong>and</strong> then act without referenceto it. Yet, at the same time, the statement is a plea for the ability, whichRachel is painfully aware she lacks, to talk enough that Nick would quoteDonne to her. The tension between the two possibilities shows Rachel'suncertainty with her new vision <strong>of</strong> the world without her formerly reassuringfacades. The impression it leaves <strong>of</strong> men, though, is that they are domineering<strong>and</strong> must be mocked into realizing their imperiousness—Nick getshis mockery turned back on him. Rachel looks the better for it, but onlybecause Nick looks worse.Mockery <strong>of</strong> his state finally makes Nate act as he needs to, as when hereturns to the morally suspect world <strong>of</strong> his law practice, a world in whicheven his hero René Lévesque has succumbed to "compromise <strong>and</strong> hedging,like the rest <strong>of</strong> the country" (274). Yet Nate's disappointment turns into atautological defence <strong>of</strong> compromise: "It's a world <strong>of</strong> unfreedom after all.Only a fool could have believed in anything else, <strong>and</strong> Lévesque is no fool.(Like Nate: not any more)" (274). Such a defence, if adhered to, justifies themockery that Rachel feels necessary to jolt a Nick into awareness <strong>of</strong> hisbehaviour, <strong>and</strong> Atwood forwards the same idea when Nate confronts themoral fervor <strong>of</strong> his mother <strong>and</strong> her imposition on him <strong>of</strong> her vision <strong>of</strong> anideal son. He sc<strong>of</strong>fs at her enthusiasm for what she believes is his idealisticreturn to law: "'Mother,... anyone who thinks they can really help people,especially doing what I'm doing, is a horse's ass'" (286). But his triumphantassertion is erased by his mother's revelation that not only has he alwaysbeen afraid <strong>of</strong> being a horse's ass, but also that she contemplated suicideafter his father's death. Appalled that she shares with him a despair <strong>of</strong> life,he realizes that his mother is not the idol he had in turn set her up as, that59
L a u r e n c e & A t w o o dhe can no longer depend on her. This is the point <strong>of</strong> total alienation forhim. Like so many others in literature whose illusions have been shattered—Updike'sRabbit, Hesse's Harry Haller, Dostoevsky's Raskolnikov—he attempts to flee to the absence <strong>of</strong> the knowledge <strong>of</strong> mortality: running<strong>and</strong> leaping <strong>and</strong> soaring, "he aims again for it, that non-existent spot wherehe longs to be. Mid-air" (288).Such flight is also evident in the last time that Rachel <strong>and</strong> Nick aretogether, a moment <strong>of</strong> inversion in his involvement with her growth toautonomy. As Nate does from Elizabeth <strong>and</strong> Martha, Nick withdraws inwhat appears to be an escape from Rachel, <strong>and</strong> the reason for his flightmakes him seem even more an ironic emissary for her. In the scene, theyhave made love for what will be the last time. Rachel affectionately says thatif she were ever to have a child, she would like it to be his. She feels immediatelyhis withdrawal from her, <strong>and</strong> he replies '"I'm not God. I can't solveanything'" (148). Apparently he believes she thinks he can put her life inorder. Rachel has meant a compliment, <strong>and</strong> whether he desires to evade itor fails to perceive it, he is implicitly discredited as not only egocentric butalso spiritually dead when he directs Rachel's attention to the cemetery.Puzzled, Rachel asks, '"Nick, why don't you ever say what you mean?'"(149). This anxiety-laden gap in signification is, at the same time, Rachel'sfirst challenge <strong>of</strong> another, the first example <strong>of</strong> her new independence <strong>of</strong>mind, whose strength makes Nick try to defend what he knows he cannot:'"Don't make a major production <strong>of</strong> it, eh?... I've said more than enough,about everything'" (149). It is uncertain whether it is Nick or Rachel whounderst<strong>and</strong>s the other better. Rachel has had difficulty speaking <strong>and</strong> interpretingherself <strong>and</strong> the words <strong>of</strong> others, but Nick evades her because he knowsthat his position is indefensible, just as Nate evades Elizabeth <strong>and</strong> Martha.Existence for Nate after his annihilation <strong>and</strong> flight, however, is not quitethat <strong>of</strong> the automaton he wants to become. He still works for political justice<strong>and</strong> "longs for a message" even while suspecting that the message is a "joke"(306). He will, at the end <strong>of</strong> the day, "lose himself among the apathetic, thefatalistic, the uncommitted, the cynical; among whom he would like to feelat home" (306). But his suspicion is unconfirmed; he does not feel at home.The sense that Atwood gives that the human spirit endures after the lastillusion has been shattered—the illusion that makes Nate "sway at the lip <strong>of</strong>the abyss" (287)—makes Lesje's pregnancy at the end, despite Nate's desirenot to have a child, not a push into the abyss but a step back from it.60
- Page 1 and 2:
A Quarterly of Criticism and Review
- Page 3 and 4:
Editorialand cultural cliché. Both
- Page 5: RobertB r i n g h u r s tZhàozhou
- Page 8 and 9: was the later opinion of Frank Tayl
- Page 10 and 11: self-entrapment and death, Patrick
- Page 13 and 14: Lowrystopped talking more than a ne
- Page 15 and 16: LowrySeen as a pictural surface, as
- Page 17 and 18: Lowryto exist first and foremost in
- Page 19 and 20: L o w r yself-making, he needed to
- Page 21 and 22: Lowry"Excessive because language ca
- Page 23 and 24: Lowry, ed. Swinging in the Maelstro
- Page 25 and 26: LeaLittlewolfcoldI dreamrasp breath
- Page 27 and 28: BoasWriting, even writing which aim
- Page 29 and 30: BoasMuch was done by Dr. Franz Boas
- Page 31 and 32: Boasapplicable to every society and
- Page 33 and 34: When we discover that there are sev
- Page 35 and 36: Boasinto the camera, and speak to s
- Page 37 and 38: Boasform of distortion that involve
- Page 39 and 40: he alone has access) which he heard
- Page 41 and 42: Boasawkwardness, strangeness and "e
- Page 43 and 44: Boasitself; his own narratology her
- Page 45 and 46: Boasstories to suit his own tonal a
- Page 47 and 48: DavidMcGimpseyToo Much Slouching,No
- Page 49 and 50: DavidHeinimannIronized ManA Jest of
- Page 51 and 52: Laurence & A t w o o drather what i
- Page 53 and 54: Laurence & A t w o o dtional. What
- Page 55: Laurence & A t w o o dfrom him, kep
- Page 59 and 60: L a u r e n c e 8t A t w o o dmade
- Page 61 and 62: L a u r e n c e fit A t w o o diron
- Page 63 and 64: L a u r e n c e fit A t w o o di Wo
- Page 65 and 66: BeverleyBrahicObjets d'ArtSliding i
- Page 67 and 68: TomWaymanA poet is allowed to use t
- Page 69 and 70: JohnPassAristotle's LanternWhen per
- Page 71 and 72: K a t h l e e nW a l lRepresenting
- Page 73 and 74: A t w o o d & M u n r othe nature o
- Page 75 and 76: A t w o o d & Munroindividual autho
- Page 77 and 78: A t w o o d & M u n r ofrom pain. I
- Page 79 and 80: A t w o o d & M u n r oto me, after
- Page 81 and 82: A t w o o d & M u n r oauthority al
- Page 83 and 84: A t w o o d 8* Munroinert and unoff
- Page 85 and 86: At wood & MunroNOTES1 I am here ent
- Page 87 and 88: A t w o o d & MunriLanser, Susan. F
- Page 89 and 90: CraigB u r n e t tLandscape with Co
- Page 91 and 92: JamieOoppAffirming Mysteryin Eric M
- Page 93 and 94: McCormackthat the smell emanates fr
- Page 95 and 96: McCormackdevice of texts within tex
- Page 97 and 98: McCormackgood to live," so the worl
- Page 99 and 100: McCormackclaim, in his introduction
- Page 101 and 102: McCormackkeywords, which is appropr
- Page 103 and 104: McCormackThe Carrick festival also
- Page 105 and 106: McCormack1 My own preference is to
- Page 107 and 108:
RobertB r i n g h u r s tThe Living
- Page 109 and 110:
Books in Reviewof cannibalism, were
- Page 111 and 112:
Books in Reviewautobiographical, ge
- Page 113 and 114:
Books in ReviewBeran's conclusion e
- Page 115 and 116:
Books in Reviewhave, despite all th
- Page 117 and 118:
Books in Reviewliterary and social
- Page 119 and 120:
Books in Reviewmen. Some would say
- Page 121 and 122:
Books in ReviewPoets as true Genius
- Page 123 and 124:
Books in ReviewIn a similar way, Mc
- Page 125 and 126:
Books in Reviewreproduced in black
- Page 127 and 128:
Books in ReviewThe engaging indirec
- Page 129 and 130:
Books in Reviewpoem or an entire ge
- Page 131 and 132:
Books in Reviewof its scale and den
- Page 133 and 134:
Books in ReviewKaplan's elaborate b
- Page 135 and 136:
Books in Reviewand in regaining cul
- Page 137 and 138:
Books in Reviewevents and the story
- Page 139 and 140:
Books in ReviewIn "The Side of the
- Page 141 and 142:
Books in Reviewtask. Utilizing cont
- Page 143 and 144:
Books in Reviewan exhilarating sens
- Page 145 and 146:
Books in ReviiA Daughter's DilemmaJ
- Page 147 and 148:
Books in Reviewopening—"In the be
- Page 149 and 150:
Books in Reviewand "lidded with app
- Page 151 and 152:
Books in Reviewits sombre social re
- Page 153 and 154:
Books in Reviewstudy is lucid and i
- Page 155 and 156:
Books in Reviewdemographics in the
- Page 157 and 158:
Books in Review"référence littér
- Page 159 and 160:
Books in Reviewdiacy of the dialogu
- Page 161 and 162:
Books in Reviewand biting in sunles
- Page 163 and 164:
Books in ReviewMétis from Webster'
- Page 165 and 166:
Books in Reviewof critical authorit
- Page 167 and 168:
Books in Reviewher mother "defied a
- Page 169 and 170:
Books in Reviewtion with "Goodbye,"
- Page 171 and 172:
Books in ReviewScheuermann examines
- Page 173 and 174:
Books in ReviewOn a less serious no
- Page 175 and 176:
Books in ReviewVoices and ChoicesJa
- Page 177 and 178:
Books in Reviewtemps à coups de co
- Page 179 and 180:
Books in Reviewhomes symbolically r
- Page 181 and 182:
B o o k s in R e v i e wpossibly—
- Page 183 and 184:
Books in Reviewthis poem, both the
- Page 185 and 186:
L a s tP a gMapping 1996W.H. NewAt
- Page 187 and 188:
L a s tP a g e sa lot of readers, I
- Page 189 and 190:
LastPagesbetween inheritance and en
- Page 191 and 192:
L a s tP a g e srary British Columb
- Page 193 and 194:
LastPagesFurther, Bourdieu's assert
- Page 195 and 196:
L a s tP a g e sapply nonetheless.
- Page 197 and 198:
LastPagesBringhurst's The Calling:
- Page 199 and 200:
LastPagesretire their legs, those c