Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies - NIHR Health ...

References9883. Cameron I, Crotty M, Currie C, Finnegan T,Gillespie L, Gillespie W, et al. Geriatricrehabilitation following fractures in older people:a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2000;4(2).84. Cho MK, Bero LA. Instruments for assessing thequality of drug studies published in the medicalliterature. JAMA 1994;272:101–4.85. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating achecklist for the assessment of the methodologicalquality both of randomised and non-randomisedstudies of health care interventions. J EpidemiolCommun Health 1998;52:377–84.86. Zaza S, Wright-de Aguero LK, Briss PA, TrumanBI, Hopkins DP, Hennessy MH, et al. Datacollection instrument and procedure for systematicreviews in the ‘Guide to Community PreventiveServices’. Am J Prev Med 2000;18:44–74.87. Miller WR, Brown JM, Simpson TL. What works?A methodological analysis of the alcohol treatmentoutcome literature. In Hester RK, Miller WR,editors. Handbook of alcoholism treatmentapproaches: effective alternatives. Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon; 1995. pp. 12–44.88. Bass JL, Christoffel KK, Widome M, Boyle W,Scheidt P, Stanwick R, et al. Childhood injuryprevention counseling in primary care settings: acritical review of the literature. Pediatrics 1993;92:544–50.89. Duffy ME. A research appraisal checklist forevaluating nursing research reports. Nurs HealthCare 1985;6:538–47.90. Shay CB, Zimmermann WS. The factorial validityof a rating scale for the evaluation of researcharticles. Educ Psychol Meas 1972;32:453–7.91. Wells-Parker E, Bangert-Drowns R. Meta-analysisof research on DUI remedial interventions. DrugsAlcohol Driving 1990;6:147–60.92. Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O’Rourke K, McGeer AJ,L’Abbe KA. Incorporating variations in the qualityof individual randomized trials into meta analysis.J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:255–65.93. Melchart D, Linde K, Worku F, Bauer R, WagnerH. Immunomodulation with Echinacea – asystematic review of controlled clinical trials.Phytomedicine 1994;1:245–54.94. Standards of Reporting Trials Group. A proposalfor structured reporting of randomised controlledtrials. JAMA 1994;272:1926–31.95. Linde K, Scholz M, Ramirez G, Clausius N,Melchart D, Jonas WB. Impact of study quality onoutcome in placebo-controlled trials ofhomeopathy. J Clin Epidemiol 1999;52:631–6.96. de Oliveira IR, Dardennes RM, Amorim ES,Diquet B, de Sena EP, Moreira EC, et al. Is there arelationship between antipsychotic blood levelsand their clinical efficacy? An analysis of studiesdesign and methodology. Fundam Clin Pharmacol1995;9:488–502.97. Coleridge Smith P. The management of chronicvenous disorders of the leg: an evidence-basedreport of an International Task Force. Phlebology1999;14:3–19.98. Dawson-Saunders B, Trapp R. Reading themedical literature. Basic and clinical biostatistics.Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange; 1990.pp. 264–76.99. DuRant RH. Checklist for the evaluation ofresearch articles. J Adolesc Health 1994;15:4–8.100. Friedenreich CM. Methods for pooled analyses ofepidemiologic studies. Epidemiology 1993;4:295–302.101. Gordis L, Kleinman JC, Klerman LV, Mullen PD,Paneth N. Criteria for evaluating evidenceregarding the effectiveness of prenatalinterventions. In Merkatz IR, Thompson JE,editors. New perspectives on prenatal care. NewYork: Elsevier; 1990. pp. 31–8.102. Hadorn DC, Baker D, Hodges JS, Hicks N. Ratingthe quality of evidence for clinical practiceguidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49:749–54.103. Wilson A, Henry DA. Meta-analysis. Part 2.Assessing the quality of published meta-analyses.Med J Aust 1992;156:173–87.104. Bracken MB. Reporting observational studies. Br JObstet Gynaecol 1989;96:383–8.105. Spitzer WO, Lawrence V, Dales R, Hill G, ArcherMC, Clarck P, et al. Links between passive smokingand disease; a best-evidence synthesis. Clin InvestMed 1990;13:17–42.106. Talley NJ, Nyren O, Drossman DA. The irritablebowel syndrome: toward optimal design ofcontrolled treatment trials. Gastroenterology Int1993;6:189–211.107. Fowkes FG, Fulton PM. Critical appraisal ofpublished research. Introductory guidelines. BMJ1991;302:1136–40.108. Weintraub M. How to critically assess clinical drugtrials. Drug Ther 1982;12:131–48.109. Cowley DE. Prostheses for primary total hipreplacement. A critical appraisal of the literature.Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1995;11:770–8.110. Vickers A. Critical appraisal: how to read a clinicalresearch paper. Complement Ther Med 1995;3:158–66.111. Reisch J, Tyson JE, Mize SG. Aid to the evaluationof therapeutic studies. Pediatrics 1989;84:815–27.112. Downs, Black N. Systematic review of the literatureon the effectiveness of surgery for stressincontinence for women. London: London Schoolof Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; 1996.