Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies - NIHR Health ...

© Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2003. All rights reserved.AuthorOrigin aModified toolTool purpose bStudy designscovered cHaynes, 1976 273 n 2 RCTs, Quasi-Exp, s u n n 6 na nr na na na n n 274, 275Analytic, DescriptiveHeacock, 1997 276 n 1/3 CCTs s u n n 14 na Range 0.36, 1.00 K ; na na na n nexcellent for 11questions (75–100),good for 2 items(53–64%) and poorfor 1 item (36%)Hedges, 1986 277 X Not a QA tool nHelfenstein, 1994 278 n 7 RCTs, NRS c n n 11 na na na na na n nHeneghan, 1996 279 m Chalmers, 1981 51 7 RCTs, NRS s e n n 15 na 91% a ; 0.83 K na na na n nHill, 1967 280 n 2 RCTs, NRS; Coh c n n 10 na na na na na n nHines, 1969 281 n 3 Clinical investigations c n n 10 na na na na na n nHoag, 1997 282 n 7 RCTs, NRS c n n 29 na 0.88 K n nHoffman, 1993 283 n 7 RCTs, NRS; Coh c n n 9 na na na na na n nHowell, 1997 284 n 7 Not stated c n y 5 na na na na na n nJabbour, 1996 285 n See Klassen, 1995 299 7 RCTs, NRS; Coh s e n n 5 na 87% a , 0.81 K , na na na n nSE=0.10Jadad, 1996 46 n 3/7 RCTs s e n n 3 FC, 0.66 r (CI: 0.53 to na na na n y 286–288Co 0.79); 86% a(0.71 K ) 286Johnston, 1994 289 n 7 RCTs, NRS s e n n 5 na na na na na n n 290Kasiske, 1995 291 n 7 RCTs, CCTs s u n n NR na na na na na n nKasiske, 1998 292 n 7 RCTs, prospective control c n n 5 na na na na na n ngroup study; B/AKasiske, 1993 293 n 7 RCTs, NRS c n n 9 na na na na na n nType of tool d(weighting)Items justified?Items by design?No. of itemsTool validity eInter-raterreliability fIntra-raterreliability fTest-retest fInternalconsistency fTime to completeUsed in otherreviews?Review referencenumbercontinuedHealth Technology Assessment 2003; Vol. 7: No. 27127