Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies - NIHR Health ...

© Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2003. All rights reserved.AuthorOrigin aModified toolBrown, 1995 216 n 7 RCTs, NRS c n n 5 na 89% a na na na n nBrown, 1996 217 m Brown, 1991 214 7 RCTs, NRS; Pre/Post s n n 6 na 94.5% a na na na n nCallahan, 1991 218 n 7 RCTs, NRS c n n 9 na na na na na n nCameron, 2000 83 n 7 RCTs, NRS c n n 36 na na na na na n nCameron, 2000 83 n 7 RCTs, NRS; Coh; CCS s u n n 9 na na na na na n nCampos-Outcalt, 1995 177 n 7 RCTs, Quasi-Exp; Coh; s e n n 7 na na na na na n nCS; CCS; correlationalstudiesCanadian Task Force, L 221–2251997, 219 1994 220Cao, 1997 226 m Chalmers, 1981 51 7 RCTs, NRS s n n NR na na na na na n nCarlson, 1996 227 n 7 RCTs, NRS c n n 7 na na na na na n nCarter, 1994 178 m Chalmers, 1981 51 7 RCTs, NRS s u n n 12 na na na na na n nCASP, 1999 64 n 3 Coh c n n 10 na na na na na n nCEBM, 2002 228 L Can Task Force, 41979 219Tool purpose bStudy designscovered cChalmers, 1981 51 n 3 RCT s u n n 36 na na na na na n y 229Cheatham, 1995 230 m Chalmers, 1981 51 7 RCTs, NRS s u n n NR na na na na na n nCho & Bero, 1994 84 m Spitzer, 1990 105 3 Exp, Obs s e n n 31 FC, 0.64 W ; na na na y nCr 0.89 r (CI: 0.73 to0.96)Type of tool d(weighting)Ciliska, 1996 231 n 7 RCTs, Coh, CCS c n n 6 na 0.80 K na na na n n 232Cochrane EPOC n 7 RCTs, CCTs c n n 7 na na na na na n y EPOCGroup, 2002 233reviewsItems justified?Items by design?No. of itemsTool validity eInter-raterreliability fIntra-raterreliability fTest-retest fInternalconsistency fTime to completeUsed in otherreviews?Review referencenumbercontinuedHealth Technology Assessment 2003; Vol. 7: No. 27123