Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies - NIHR Health ...

132AuthorOrigin aModified toolTool purpose bStudy designscovered cType of tool d(weighting)Items justified?Items by design?No. of itemsTool validity eInter-raterreliability fIntra-raterreliability fTest-retest fInternalconsistency fTime to completeUsed in otherreviews?Review referencenumberAppendix 3Sackett, 1989 126 , 1985 349 L 4 y 350, 351Salisbury, 1997 198 n 7 RCTs, descriptive studies; c n n 45 na na na na na n nmethodological studiesSchechter, 1991 199 n 3 CCT c n n 30 na na na na na n nSchmid, 1991 121 X Not a QA tool y 352Sellers, 1997 353 n 7 RCTs, NRS c n n 13 na na na na na n nSelley, 1997 354 n 7 NRS, Coh s n n 9 na na na na na n nShaver, 1989 355 n 7 RCTs, Quasi-Exp, Pre/Post c n n 162 na 94% a na na na n nShay, 1972 90 n 3 Any c n n 25 Fa high na na na n nSheldon, 1993 200 n 3 RCTs, Quasi-Exp, Coh, c n n 36 na na na na na n nCCS, CSSimons, 1996 356 n 7 RCTs, CCTs s e n n 9 na 85% a na na na n nSlavin, 1986 357 X Not a QA tool y 358Smeenk, 1998 359 n 7 RCTs, CCTs s u n n 34 na 90.8% a na na na n nSmith, 1991 360 n 7 Exp, Non-Exp s e n n 22 na na na na na n ySmith, 1977 361 X Not a QA tool y 362Smith, 1988 125 X Not a QA tool y 363Smith, 1980 364 n 7 RCTs, CCTs c n n 21 na 92% a na na na n nNRSolomon, 1993 365 m Evans and Pollock, 2 RCTs, NRS; case studies s n n 10 na 0.69 K 0.67 K na na n n1985 407Solomon, 1997 366 n 7 RCTs, Coh; survey c n y 11 na na na na na n ncontinued