Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies - NIHR Health ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References108372. Tangkanakul C, Counsell CE, Warlow CP.Local versus general anaesthesia in carotidendarterectomy: a systematic review ofthe evidence. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg1997;13:491–9.373. Theis JG, Selby P, Ikizler Y, Koren G. Currentmanagement of the neonatal abstinencesyndrome: a critical analysis of the evidence. BiolNeonate 1997;71:345–56.374. Thomas JP, Lawrence TS. Common deficiencies ofNIDRR research applications. Am J Phys MedRehabil 1991;70:161–4.375. Thomas J, DeHueck A, Kleiner M, Newton J,Crowe J, Mahler S. To vibrate or not to vibrate:usefulness of the mechanical vibrator forclearing bronchial secretions. Physiother Can1995;47:120–5.376. Tuckman BW. A proposal for improving thequality of published research. Educ Researcher1990;19:2–25.377. US Preventive Services Task Force. Task forceratings. In US Preventive Services Task Force,editor. Guide to clinical preventive services.Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1996.pp. 861–85.378. US Preventive Services Task Force. Task forceratings. In US Preventive Services Task Force,editor. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services.Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1989.pp. 387–98.379. Robert G, Stevens A. Should general practitionersrefer patients directly to physical therapists? Br JGen Pract 1997;47:314–18.380. Long T, Soderstrom E. A critical appraisal ofpositioning infants in the neonatal intensive careunit. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 1995;15:17–31.381. Witlin AG, Sibai BM. Magnesium sulfate therapyin preeclampsia and eclampsia. Obstet Gynecol1998;92:883–9.382. Grullon KE, Grimes DA. The safety of earlypostpartum discharge: a review and critique. ObstetGynecol 1997;90:860–5.383. Grimes DA. Medical abortion in early pregnancy:a review of the evidence. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:790–6.384. van Balkom AJ, Bakker A, Spinhoven P, BlaauwBM, Smeenk S, Ruesink B. A meta-analysis of thetreatment of panic disorder with or withoutagoraphobia: a comparison ofpsychopharmacological, cognitive-behavioral, andcombination treatments. J Nerv Ment Dis 1997;185:510–16.385. van Dalen DB. A research checklist in education.Educ Admin Supervision 1958;44:174–81.386. Vickers AJ. Hypnotherapy for irritable bowelsyndrome. A report commissioned by North EastThames Regional Health Authority. London:Research Council for Complementary Medicine;1994.387. Ward M, Fetler M. What guidelines should befollowed in critically evaluating research reports.Nurs Res 1979;28:120–5.388. Weiler JM. Medical modifiers of sports injuries.The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugsin sports soft tissue injury. Clinc Sports Med 1992;11:625–44.389. Wolf RM. Judging educational research based onexperiments and surveys. Fundamentals ofeducational planning series No. 45. Paris: UnitedNations Educational, Scientific and CulturalOrganization; 1993.390. Woolf SH, Battista RN, Andeson GM, Logan AG,Wang E, Canadian Task Force on the PeriodicHealth Examination. Assessing the clinicaleffectiveness of preventive manoeuvres: analyticprinciples and systematic methods in reviewingevidence and developing clinical practicerecommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 1990;43:891–905.391. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Reviewof the research on the effectiveness of health serviceinterventions to reduce variations in health. CRDReport 3. York: University of York, 1995. pp. 1–157.392. Zola P, Volpe T, Castelli G, Sismondi P, NicolucciA, Parazzini F, et al. Is the published literature areliable guide for deciding between alternativetreatments for patients with early cervical cancer?Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1989;16:785–97.393. ACCP/AACVPR Pulmonary RehabilitationGuidelines Panel. Pulmonary rehabilitation: jointACCP/AACVPR evidence-based guidelines. Chest1997;112:1363–96.394. Eastwood AE, Sheldon TA. Organisation of asthmacare: what differences does it make? A systematicreview of the literature. Qual Health Care 1996;5:134–43.395. Hearn J, Higginson IJ. Do specialist palliative careteams improve outcomes for cancer patients?Palliat Med 1998;12:317–32.396. MacMillan HL, MacMillan JH, Offord DR, GriffithDL, MacMillan A. Primary prevention of childsexual abuse and neglect: a critical review. Part 2. JChild Psychol Psychiatry 1994;35:857–76.397. Mathews F. Antioxidant nutrients in pregnancy: asystematic review of the literature. Nutr Res Rev1996;9:175–95.398. Parker J, Bisits A, Proietto AM. A systematic reviewof single-dose intramuscular methotrexate for thetreatment of ectopic pregnancy. Aust NZ J ObstetGynaecol 1998;38:145–50.
Health Technology Assessment 2003; Vol. 7: No. 27399. Powe NR, Schein OD, Gieser SC, Tielsch JM,Luthra R, Javitt J, et al. Synthesis of theliterature on visual acuity and complicationsfollowing cataract extraction with intraocularlens implantation. Cataract Patient OutcomeResearch Team. Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:239–52.400. Snowdon SK, Stewart-Brown SL. Preschool visionscreening: results of a systematic review. CRDReport 9. York: University of York, 1997.pp. 1–114.401. Talley NJ, Owen BK, Boyce P, Paterson K.Psychological treatment for irritable bowelsyndrome: a critique of controlled treatment trials.Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:277–83.402. Villalobos T, Arango C, Kubilis P, Rathore M.Antibiotic prophylaxis after basilar skullfractures: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis1998;27:364–9.403. Poynard T. Evaluation de la qualitemethodologique des essais therapeutiquesrandomises. Presse Med 1988;17:315–18.404. Fiske DW, Hunt HF, Luborsky L, Orne MT et al.Planning of research on effectiveness ofpsychotherapy. American Psychologist1970;25:727–37.405. Bergin AE, Lambert MJ. The evaluation oftherapeutic outcomes. In Garfield SL, Bergin AE,editors. Handbook of psychotherapy and behaviorchange. New York: John Wiley; 1978. pp. 139–89.406. Jonsson C, Martens S, Sjoqvist F. [Attitude towardclinical tests of drugs – especially psychopharmaca].Nordisk Psykiatrisk Tidsskrift. 1969;23:281–9.407. Evans M, Pollock AV. A score system for evaluatingrandom control clinical trials of prophylaxis ofabdominal surgical wound infections. Br J Surg1985;72:256–60.109© Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2003. All rights reserved.
Page 1 and 2:
Health Technology Assessment 2003;
Page 3 and 4:
Evaluating non-randomisedinterventi
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
© Queen’s Printer and Controller
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33:
Page 36 and 37:
Evaluation of checklists and scales
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
32TABLE 8 Details of top 60 quality
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
38TABLE 10 Other domains: reporting
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Use of quality assessment in system
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Empirical estimates of bias associa
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71: Empirical estimates of bias associa
Page 76 and 77: Empirical evaluation of the ability
Page 82 and 83: 70TABLE 22 Comparison of concurrent
Page 86 and 87: 74TABLE 26 Comparison of methods of
Page 92 and 93: 80TABLE 33 Hypothetical example dem
Page 94 and 95: 82TABLE 34 Hypothetical example dem
Page 100 and 101: Discussion and conclusions88histori
Page 102 and 103: Discussion and conclusions90For exa
Page 104 and 105: Discussion and conclusionsNon-rando
Page 107 and 108: Health Technology Assessment 2003;
Page 119: Health Technology Assessment 2003;
Page 124 and 125: Appendix 1data)) or (non-random$ or
Page 126 and 127: Appendix 2AuthorYearENDARESourcePub
Page 128 and 129: Appendix 2Author:Accession No:Endno
Page 130 and 131: Appendix 20 0 00Additional outcomes
Page 132 and 133: Appendix 2Endnote NoWas CMA conside
Page 134 and 135: 122AuthorOrigin aModified toolTool
Page 148 and 149: Appendix 4136DuRant, 1994 99The typ
Page 155 and 156: © Queen’s Printer and Controller
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185:
Page 188 and 189:
Health Technology Assessment Progra
Page 190:
Health Technology Assessment Progra
show all

Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies - NIHR Health ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?