Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies - NIHR Health ...

© Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2003. All rights reserved.AuthorOrigin aModified toolTool purpose bStudy designscovered cde Vet, 1997 72 m ter Riet, 1990 68 7 RCTs, NRS s e n n 15 na 0.77 r na na na n n(0.64–0.89) 67DerSimonian, 1982 247 n 6 CCTs c n n 11 na 9 items > 80% a na na na n nDetsky, 1992 92 m Chalmers, 1981 51 7 RCTs c n n 14 na 0.53 r248 na na na n y 248–249Devine, 1992 250 n 7 Not clear c n n 3? na 89% a , 0.79 K na na na n nDevine, 1983 251 n 7 RCTs, NRS c n n 6 na 92% a na na na n nDevine, 1995 252 n 7 RCTs, Quasi-Exp; Pre/Post c n y NR na 87–100% a na na na n nDevine, 1995 253 n 7 RCTs, NRS c n n NR na na na na na n nDowns, 1998 85 n 3 RCTs, NRS s u n n 27 FC, 0.75 r na 0.88 r na y y 112, 130Cr@2 wks0.89 KrDuffy, 1985 89 n 3 Any s e n n 51 na 0.89 254 0.94 na 0.91 CA n y 254at2 monthsDuRant, 1994 99 n 3 Exp, Quasi-Exp, Survey, CS c n y 103 na na na na na n nDurlak, 1997 255 n 7 RCTs, CTs c n n 6 na 0.85 a (range na na na n n0.75–0.99)Elvik, 1995 256 n 7 NRS c n n NR na na na na na n nEsdaile, 1986 257 n 3 Coh, CCS c n n 6 na na na na na n nFarquhar, 1959 258 n 3 Exp, c n n 18 na na na na na n nFowkes, 1991 107 n 3 CCTs, Coh, CCS, CS c n n 23 na na na na na n y 97Fox, 1958 259 n 3/1 NS c n n 7 na na na na na n nFriedenreich, 1993 100 n 7 Coh, CCS c n y 29 na na na na na n nType of tool d(weighting)Items justified?Items by design?No. of itemsTool validity eInter-raterreliability fIntra-raterreliability fTest-retest fInternalconsistency fTime to completeUsed in otherreviews?Review referencenumbercontinuedHealth Technology Assessment 2003; Vol. 7: No. 27125