Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies - NIHR Health ...

128AuthorOrigin aModified toolTool purpose bStudy designscovered cType of tool d(weighting)Items justified?Items by design?No. of itemsTool validity eInter-raterreliability fIntra-raterreliability fTest-retest fInternalconsistency fTime to completeUsed in otherreviews?Review referencenumberAppendix 3Kay, 1996 186 n 7 RCTs, NRS s e n n 20 na na na na na n nKing, 1984 294 n 3 Drug trials c n n 12 na na na na na n nKing, 1990 295 m King, 1984 294 3 Drug trials c n n 13 na na na na na n nKing, 1990 296 m King, 1984 294 3 Drug trials c n n 17 na na na na na n nKingery, 1997 297 m Koes, 1991 70 7 Not clear, CCTs s u n n 13 na na na na na n nKinney, 1996 298 m Smith and 7 Exp, Quasi-exp s e n n 21 na 0.79–0.94 W na na na n nStullenbarger,1991 360Klassen, 1995 299 m ter Riet, 1990 68 7 RCTs, NRS s u n n 45 na 74% a n nKleijnen, 1994 300 m Kleijnen, 1991 69 7 RCTs, NRS s e n n 10 na na na na na n nKleijnen, 1995 301 m Kleijnen, 1991? 69 7 RCTs, NRS s e n n 10 na na na na na n nKleijnen, 1991 69 m ter Riet, 1990? 68 7 RCTs, NRS s u n n 7 na na na na na n n 302Koes, 1991 70 m ter Riet, 1990 68 7 RCTs, s u n n 17 na 80% a na na na n y 303, 304Kreulen, 1998 187 m Antzcak, 1986 76 7 Not clear, prospective s u n n 17 na 0–1 K ; 0.95 r , na na na n nstudy; cross-CS; p < 0.001retrospective studyKristensen, 1989 305 n 7 NRS c n n 5 na na na na na n y 306Krogh, 1985 307 n 3 Any c n n 11 na na na na na n nKulik, 1990 308 n 7 RCTs, NRS c n y 15 na na na na na n nKwakkel, 1997 188 n 7 RCTs, CCTs s e n n 16 na 0.86 K na na na n nL’Abbe, 1987 120 X No QA tool (Allegedly based on y 309, 402reportedChalmers)Labrecque, 1989 310 n 3 Intervention studies c n n 6 na na na na na n nLeboeuf, 1990 311 n 6/2 RCTs, NRS; Coh; surveys c n y 10 na na na na na n ncontinued