Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies - NIHR Health ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References104conflicting data for the role of oral contraceptivesin the etiology of rheumatoid arthritis. J Chron Dis1986;39:841–52.258. Farquhar WW, Krumboltz JD. A checklist forevaluating experimental research in psychologyand education. J Educ Res 1959;52:353–4.259. Fox JH. Criteria of good research. Phi DeltaKappan 1958;39:284–6.260. Collingsworth S, Gould D, Wainwright SP. Patientself-administration of medication: a review of theliterature. Int J Nurs Stud 1997;34:256–69.261. Gansevoort RT, Sluiter WJ, Hemmelder MH,de Zeeuw D, de Jong PE. Antiproteinuric effect ofblood-pressure-lowering agents: a meta-analysis ofcomparative trials. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1995;10:1963–74.262. Garber BG, Hebert PC, Yelle JD, Hodder RV,McGowan J. Adult respiratory distress syndrome:a systematic overview of incidence and risk factors.Crit Care Med 1996;24:687–95.263. Garg A, Shiau J, Guyatt G. The ineffectiveness ofimmunosuppressive therapy in lymphocyticmyocarditis: an overview. Ann Intern Med 1998;128:317–22.264. Callahan CM, Drake BG, Heck DA, Dittus RS.Patient outcomes following unicompartmental orbicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a metaanalysis.J Arthroplasty 1995;10:141–50.265. Gifford RH, Feinstein AR. A critique ofmethodology in studies of anticoagulant therapyfor acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med1969;280:351–7.266. Good M. Effects of relaxation and music onpostoperative pain: a review. J Adv Nurs 1996;24:905–14.267. Fiscella K. Does prenatal care improve birthoutcomes? A critical review. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:468–79.268. Gray MA, McPherson IG. Agoraphobia: a criticalreview of methodology in behavioural treatmentresearch. Curr Psychol Rev 1982;2:19–45.269. Gyorkos TW, Tannenbaum TN, Abrahamowicz M,Bedard L, Carsley J, Franco ED, et al. Evaluationof the effectiveness of immunization deliverymethods. Can J Public Health 1994;85:S14–30.270. Riben PD, Mathias RG, Campbell E, Wiens M.The evaluation of the effectiveness of routinerestaurant inspections and education of foodhandlers: critical appraisal of the literature. Can JPublic Health 1994;85:S56–60.271. Oxman AD, Scott EA, Sellors JW, Clarke JH,Millson ME, Rasooly I, et al. Partner notificationfor sexually transmitted diseases: an overview ofthe evidence. Can J Public Health 1994;85:S41–7.272. Hancock L, Sanson Fisher RW, Redman S, BurtonR, Burton L, Butler J, et al. Community action forhealth promotion: a review of methods andoutcomes 1990–1995. Am J Prev Med 1997;13:229–39.273. Haynes RB, Sackett DL, Taylor DW, Hackett BC,Luterbach E, Cloak JR. An annotated bibliography(including notes on methodologic standards forcompliance research). In Sackett DL, Haynes RB,editors. Compliance with therapeutic regimens.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press;1976. pp. 193–7.274. Mullen PD, Mains DA, Velez R. A meta-analysis ofcontrolled trials of cardiac patient education.Patient Educ Couns 1992;19:143–56.275. Mullen PD, Green LW, Persinger G. Clinical trialsof patient education for chronic conditions: acomparative meta-analysis of intervention types.Prev Med 1985;14:753–81.276. Heacock H, Koehoorn M, Tan J. Applyingepidemiological principles to ergonomics: achecklist for incorporating sound design andinterpretation of studies. Appl Ergon1997;28:165–72.277. Hedges LV. Issues in meta-analysis. Review ofResearch in Education 1986;13:353–98.278. Helfenstein U, Steiner M. Fluoride varnishes(Duraphat): a meta-analysis. Comm Dent OralEpidemiol 1994;22:1–5.279. Heneghan AM, Horwitz SM, Leventhal JM.Evaluating intensive family preservation programs:a methodological review. Pediatrics 1996;97:535–42.280. Hill MJ, Blane HT. Evaluation of psychotherapywith alcoholics: a critical review. Q J Stud Alcohol1967;28:76–104.281. Hines DC, Goldziehr JW. Clinical investigation: aguide to its evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1969;105:450–87.282. Hoag M, Burlingame G. Evaluating theeffectiveness of child and adolescent grouptreatment: a meta-analytic review. J Clin ChildPsychol 1997;26:234–46.283. Hoffman RM, Wheeler KJ, Deyo RA. Surgery forherniated lumbar discs: a literature synthesis.J Gen Intern Med 1993;8:487–96.284. Howell WH, McNamara DJ, Tosca MA, Smith BT,Gaines JA. Plasma lipid and lipoprotein responsesto dietary fat and cholesterol: a meta-analysis. Am JClin Nutr 1997;65:1747–64.285. Jabbour M, Osmond MH, Klassen TP. Life supportcourses: are they effective? Ann Emerg Med 1996;28:690–8.286. Lucassen PL, Assendelft WJ, Gubbels JW, van EijkJT, van Geldrop WJ, Neven AK. Effectiveness of
Health Technology Assessment 2003; Vol. 7: No. 27treatments for infantile colic: systematic review.BMJ 1998;316:1563–9.287. Ernst E, Pittler MH. The effectiveness ofacupuncture in treating acute dental pain: asystematic review. Br Dent J 1998;184:443–7.288. Saint S, Elmore JG, Sullivan SD, Emerson SS,Koepsell TD. The efficacy of silver alloy-coatedurinary catheters in preventing urinary tractinfection: a meta-analysis. Am J Med 1998;105:236–41.289. Johnston ME, Langton KB, Haynes RB, MathieuA. Effects of computer-based clinical decisionsupport systems on clinician performance andpatient outcome. A critical appraisal of research.Ann Intern Med 1994;120:135–42.290. Sullivan F, Mitchell E. Has general practitionercomputing made a difference to patient care? Asystematic review of published reports. BMJ1995;311:848–52.291. Kasiske BL, Ma JZ, Kalil RS, Louis TA. Effects ofantihypertensive therapy on serum lipids. AnnIntern Med 1995;122:133–41.292. Kasiske BL, Lakatua JD, Ma JZ, Louis TA. A metaanalysisof the effects of dietary protein restrictionon the rate of decline in renal function. Am JKidney Dis 1998;31:954–61.293. Kasiske BL, Heimduthoy K, Ma JZ. Electivecyclosporine withdrawal after renal transplantation– a meta-analysis. JAMA 1993;269:395–400.294. King PR. Methodological guidelines for readingdrug evaluation research. Can J Psychiatry1984;29:575–82.295. King PR. Appraising the quality of drugevaluationresearch: I. A method of meta-analysisfor acute treatment medications. Can J Psychiatry1990;35:316–9.296. King PR. Appraising the quality of drugevaluationresearch: II. A methodological reviewprocedure for prophylactic treatment trials. J ClinPsychopharmacol 1990;10:22–6.297. Kingery WS. A critical review of controlled clinicaltrials for peripheral neuropathic pain andcomplex regional pain syndromes. Pain1997;73:123–39.298. Kinney MR, Burfitt SN, Stullenbarger E, Rees B,DeBolt MR. Quality of life in cardiac patientresearch: a meta analysis. Nurs Res1996;45:173–80.299. Klassen T, Verhey FR, Sneijders GH, Rozendaal N,De Vet HC, Van Praag HM. Treatment ofdepression in Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis.J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1995;7:281–6.300. Kleijnen J, Knipschild P. Mistletoe treatment forcancer. Review of controlled trials in humans.Phytomedicine 1994;1:255–60.301. Kleijnen J, Knipschild P. Hyperbaric oxygen formultiple sclerosis. Review of controlled trials. ActaNeurol Scand 1995;91:330–4.302. Ernst E, Barnes J. Are homeopathic remedieseffective for delayed-onset muscle soreness? Asystematic review of placebo-controlled trials.Perfusion 1998;11:4–8.303. Lijesen GKS, Theeuwen I, Assendelft WJJ, Van derWal G. The effect of human chorionicgonadotropin (hCG) in the treatment of obesity bymeans of the simeons therapy: a criteria-basedmeta-analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1995;40:237–43.304. Verhagen AP, de Vet HC, de Bie RA, Kessels AG,Boers M, Knipschild PG. Taking baths: the efficacyof balneotherapy in patients with arthritis. Asystematic review. J Rheumatol 1997;24:1964–71.305. Kristensen TS. Cardiovascular diseases and thework environment. A critical review of theepidemiologic literature on nonchemical factors.Scand J Work Environ Health 1989;15:165–79.306. Krause N, Dasinger LK, Neuhauser F. Modifiedwork and return to work: a review of the literature.J Occup Rehab 1998;8:113–39.307. Krogh CL. A checklist system for critical review ofmedical literature. Med Educ 1985;19:392–5.308. Kulik CL, Kulik JA, Bangert-Drowns RL.Effectiveness of mastery learning programs: ameta-analysis. Rev Educ Res 1990;60:265–99.309. Detsky AS, Baker JP, O’Rourke K, Goel V.Perioperative parenteral nutrition: a meta-analysis.Ann Intern Med 1987;107:195–203.310. Labrecque M. Evaluation critique des publicationsmédicales: mise à jour pratique. Can Fam Physician1989;35:792–5.311. Leboeuf C. A review of data reports published inthe Journal of Manipulative and PhysiologicalTherapeutics from 1986 to 1988. J ManipulativePhysiol Ther 1990;13:89–95.312. Lee C-M, Picard M, Blain M-D. A methodologicaland substantive review of intervention outcomestudies for families undergoing divorce. J FamPsychol 1994;8:3–15.313. Cooper BC, Mullins PR, Jones MR, Lang SD.Clinical efficacy of roxithromycin in the treatmentof adults with upper and lower respiratory tractinfection due to Haemophilus influenzae. A metaanalysisof 12 clinical studies. Drug Invest 1994;7:299–314.314. Linde K, Melchart D. Randomized controlledtrials of individualized homeopathy: a state-ofthe-artreview. J Altern Complement Med 1998;4:371–88.315. Lionel ND, Herxheimer A. Assessing reports oftherapeutic trials. BMJ 1970;3:637–40.105© Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2003. All rights reserved.
Page 1 and 2:
Health Technology Assessment 2003;
Page 3 and 4:
Evaluating non-randomisedinterventi
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
© Queen’s Printer and Controller
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33:
Page 36 and 37:
Evaluation of checklists and scales
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
32TABLE 8 Details of top 60 quality
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
38TABLE 10 Other domains: reporting
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Use of quality assessment in system
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Empirical estimates of bias associa
Page 64 and 65:
Empirical estimates of bias associa
Page 66 and 67: Empirical estimates of bias associa
Page 76 and 77: Empirical evaluation of the ability
Page 82 and 83: 70TABLE 22 Comparison of concurrent
Page 86 and 87: 74TABLE 26 Comparison of methods of
Page 92 and 93: 80TABLE 33 Hypothetical example dem
Page 94 and 95: 82TABLE 34 Hypothetical example dem
Page 100 and 101: Discussion and conclusions88histori
Page 102 and 103: Discussion and conclusions90For exa
Page 104 and 105: Discussion and conclusionsNon-rando
Page 107 and 108: Health Technology Assessment 2003;
Page 115: Health Technology Assessment 2003;
Page 121: Health Technology Assessment 2003;
Page 124 and 125: Appendix 1data)) or (non-random$ or
Page 126 and 127: Appendix 2AuthorYearENDARESourcePub
Page 128 and 129: Appendix 2Author:Accession No:Endno
Page 130 and 131: Appendix 20 0 00Additional outcomes
Page 132 and 133: Appendix 2Endnote NoWas CMA conside
Page 134 and 135: 122AuthorOrigin aModified toolTool
Page 148 and 149: Appendix 4136DuRant, 1994 99The typ
Page 155 and 156: © Queen’s Printer and Controller
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185:
Page 188 and 189:
Health Technology Assessment Progra
Page 190:
Health Technology Assessment Progra
show all

Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies - NIHR Health ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?