13.07.2015 Views

computer modeling in molecular biology.pdf

computer modeling in molecular biology.pdf

computer modeling in molecular biology.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4 Molecular Dynamics and Free Energy Calculations 95potential problem [102]. Assum<strong>in</strong>g that only the rotational isomers of the mutatedsidecha<strong>in</strong>s contribute significantly to the free energy difference, the procedure ofStraatsma and McCammon [loo] was used to evaluate the correction that one wouldneed to apply to the computed free energy change for the Ile + Ala mutation, to adequatelyaccount for rotational isomer sampl<strong>in</strong>g. This correction was evaluated to beabout 0.5 kcal/mol [104], <strong>in</strong> accord with results obta<strong>in</strong>ed previously when comput<strong>in</strong>gb<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g free energies of antiviral drugs to human rh<strong>in</strong>ovirus [105].Another source of systematic error could be the use of an <strong>in</strong>adequate model forthe unfolded state, about which detailed <strong>in</strong>formation is not available. The magnitudeof the error thus <strong>in</strong>troduced was evaluated <strong>in</strong> the context of a different mutation ofthe same residue: Ile 96 -+ Val [104]. The correspond<strong>in</strong>g alchemical transformationwas computed <strong>in</strong> the gas phase for both the extended heptapeptide, and the sameheptapeptide taken <strong>in</strong> the a-helical conformation. The computed free energy valueswere found to differ by less than 0.5 kcal/mol between the two conformations.In conclusion, the statistical imprecision of the free energy calculations described<strong>in</strong> this section are evaluated to be between 1-2 kcal/mol. Several of the possiblesystematic errors are estimated not to exceed 0.5 kcal/mol and hence to lie wellwith<strong>in</strong> the overall statistical error of the calculations. Systematic errors due to shortcom<strong>in</strong>gof the potential function may also be of consequence, but have not been consideredhere.4.3.5 Prote<strong>in</strong> Stability and the Hydrophobic EffectIn analyz<strong>in</strong>g the effects of am<strong>in</strong>o-acid substitutions on prote<strong>in</strong> stability, parallels areoften drawn between prote<strong>in</strong> denaturation and transfer processes from organicsolvents to water, or hydration free energies. In a good number of cases [89, 90,107- 1101 the change <strong>in</strong> thermodynamic stability between the wild type and mutantwas found to be roughly proportional to the free energies of transfer. But the correlationwith hydration free energy changes were much poorer [107].Similar trends are observed for the Ile-Ala mutation analyzed here. Thedifference <strong>in</strong> the transfer free energies of Ala versus Ile range from 1.5 to3.11 kcal/mol, values obta<strong>in</strong>ed for octanol and cyclohexane respectively [lll, 1121.These values are of the same order as the computed or experimental fold<strong>in</strong>g freeenergy differences between the wild type and Ala mutant. On the other hand,the hydration free energy differences between Ile and Ala are significantly smaller.The experimental values differ by - 0.21 kcal/mol and the computed difference(AAG,,,) is -0.251 - 1.15 kcal/mol.To understand the orig<strong>in</strong>s of these observations it is useful to consider separatelythe transfer of the side cha<strong>in</strong> from the gas phase to the <strong>in</strong>terior of the prote<strong>in</strong> and<strong>in</strong>to the aqueous solvent (Figure 4-18). To do so, the water to prote<strong>in</strong> transfer process

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!