13.07.2015 Views

computer modeling in molecular biology.pdf

computer modeling in molecular biology.pdf

computer modeling in molecular biology.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5 Modell<strong>in</strong>g Nucleic Acids 115With <strong>in</strong> vacua simulations, the microcanonical ensemble appears preferable; while<strong>in</strong> aquo simulations with periodic boundary conditions are better handled <strong>in</strong> the(A? T)-ensemble (Figures 5-5 and 5-6).Figure 5-6. Root mean squares deviations (<strong>in</strong> A) versus time (<strong>in</strong> ps) dur<strong>in</strong>g the heat<strong>in</strong>g, theequilibration, and the production steps for the three types of MD simulations described <strong>in</strong>Figure 5-5. The deviations are calculated on all atoms between the start<strong>in</strong>g conformation andthe <strong>in</strong>stantaneous one. (From Fritsch et al. [25]).5.8 Choice of Cut-OffsAlthough, ideally, no cut-off limit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ter-particle <strong>in</strong>teractions should be applied,practically, <strong>computer</strong> limitations impose them especially <strong>in</strong> case of <strong>in</strong> aquo simulations.The notion of Debye distance mentioned above sets a cut-off on electrostatic<strong>in</strong>teractions around 10 A. For <strong>in</strong> aquo simulations, the cut-off for solute-solvent <strong>in</strong>teractionswas generally chosen around 8 to 9 A, while no cut-off was set for solutesolute<strong>in</strong>teractions (i. e. <strong>in</strong>teractions between nucleic acid atoms as well as betweennucleic acid atoms and counterions which are considered <strong>in</strong> AMBER as belong<strong>in</strong>gto the solute).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!