13.07.2015 Views

computer modeling in molecular biology.pdf

computer modeling in molecular biology.pdf

computer modeling in molecular biology.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7 Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Prote<strong>in</strong>-Peptide Interactions 185demonstrates that despite the <strong>in</strong>herent bias towards the HLA-A2 structure of themodel built HLA-Aw68 structure, that it displays RMS deviations of the same orderof magnitude to HLA-A2 as the crystallographic structure. The RMS deviations forthe H-2Kb model <strong>in</strong> comparison to the two H-2Kb crystallographic structuresdisplay that models of MHC molecules of other loci or species may be built whichare an accurate reflection of the true structure.7.3 The Structure of the Peptide <strong>in</strong> the GrooveIn order to simulate the complexed state of MHC class I molecule and peptide accuratelywe must fully understand the role played by the peptide, the functionalityof the complex, and the shape of the peptide observed <strong>in</strong> crystal structures to date.The first comment which may be made about the structure of the peptide bound tothe class I molecule is that it is, <strong>in</strong> essence, a l<strong>in</strong>ear structure. The ~/I,Y torsion anglesof the peptide backbone lie largely with<strong>in</strong> the /?-sheet region of the Ramachandranplot. The ends of the peptide are heavily buried with<strong>in</strong> the MHC molecule and thecentre of the peptide bulges out of the groove. The magnitude of the bulge is apparentlya function of the length of the peptide bound; octamers are essentiallyl<strong>in</strong>ear, nonamers have a larger more pronounced bulge at P4 and P5 and presumablydecamers bulge even more.Figures 7-9 and 7-10 show the highly conserved residues which ligate the N- andC-term<strong>in</strong>i of the peptide. The majority of direct hydrogen bond<strong>in</strong>g contacts madeto the MHC molecule from the peptide are made by the term<strong>in</strong>i, with the majorityof contacts with<strong>in</strong> the central bulge of the peptide be<strong>in</strong>g mediated by water. In thismanner a certa<strong>in</strong> degree of promiscuity is afforded to the b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of peptide withoutcompromis<strong>in</strong>g the structural <strong>in</strong>tegrity of the peptide-MHC <strong>in</strong>teraction. If the term<strong>in</strong>i,or residues close to them are the only parts of the epitope which need be conservedbetween peptides, a far greater number of different peptides may be boundthan if there were restrictions both close to the term<strong>in</strong>i and <strong>in</strong> the centre of the peptide.In a system where the peptide is such an <strong>in</strong>tegral part of the fold<strong>in</strong>g pathway andstability of the molecule, the structure and the accuracy of simulation of the peptidecomponent are of paramount importance. The ground state of the MHC moleculeis different from the state <strong>in</strong> which peptide is bound and cannot be accessed bycrystallography. The different structure of the ground state can be directly shown bythe <strong>in</strong>ability of conformationally dependant monoclonal antibodies to recognise differentstates with<strong>in</strong> the fold<strong>in</strong>g pathway to those aga<strong>in</strong>st which they were generated.In order to achieve the “compact” conformation, the class I molecule must b<strong>in</strong>dboth peptide and &microglobul<strong>in</strong>. However the shape of the molecule before and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!