13.07.2015 Views

computer modeling in molecular biology.pdf

computer modeling in molecular biology.pdf

computer modeling in molecular biology.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7 Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Prote<strong>in</strong>-Peptide Interactions 181Figure 7-10. View of the C-term<strong>in</strong>al b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g ligands <strong>in</strong> HLA-B*2705. In the structures ofHLA-B*2705 and HLA-A*6801 Thr80 <strong>in</strong>teracts <strong>in</strong>directly with the C-term<strong>in</strong>us of the peptidevia a water molecule and ?frr123 <strong>in</strong>teracts with ?frr84. In some HLA-B locus alleles where position80 is the subject of a non-conservative threon<strong>in</strong>e to leuc<strong>in</strong>e substitution the distributionof water molecules appears from <strong>molecular</strong> dynamics studies to be perturbed (see Section7.8). In some mouse and human non-classical or medial class I MHC molecules there aresubstitutions for positions 143 and 147 that would appear to disturb this network considerably.the spac<strong>in</strong>g between two discrete residues statistically enhances the probability off<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g an epitope with<strong>in</strong> a sequence.The structure of HLA-Aw68 with a collection of endogenous peptides at 1.9 Aclearly demonstrates that the term<strong>in</strong>i of the peptide are highly similar <strong>in</strong> peptides ofdissimilar length. In this structure clear <strong>in</strong>terpretable density is present for positionsPl-P3 and PC-1 to PC but <strong>in</strong> the central bulge of the peptide the lack of contiguouselectron density suggests that <strong>in</strong> the region of the peptide between the anchors severalconformations occur. This f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>in</strong> agreement with observations which may bemade from an overlay of the octamer and nonamer peptide structures bound to theH-2Kb molecule. For these peptides the backbones for positions P1 to P3 and PC-1to PC are virtually identical. The peptides are also co-<strong>in</strong>cident at the PC-3 positionwhich is an anchor <strong>in</strong> the H-2Kb motif. Thus the only differences between the octamerand nonamer peptide is the shape of the bulge which jo<strong>in</strong>s P3 to PC-3. In theoctamer peptide this region is simply more extended than <strong>in</strong> the nonamer peptide asmight have been expected from the difference <strong>in</strong> length of the peptide.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!